This paper examines the scientific controversy over the yields of genetically modified [GM] crops as a case study in epistemologically deep disagreements. Appeals to “the evidence” are inadequate to resolve such disagreements; not because the interlocutors have radically different metaphysical views (as in cases of incommensurability), but instead because they assume rival epistemological frameworks and so have incompatible views about what kinds of research methods and claims count as evidence. Specifically, I show that, in the yield debate, proponents and opponents of GM crops cite two different sets of claims as evidence, which correspond to two rival epistemological frameworks, classical experimental epistemology and Nancy Cartwright's evidence for use. I go on to argue that, even if both sides of the debate accepted Cartwright's view, they might still disagree over what counts as evidence, because evidence for use ties standards of evidence to what is sometimes called the “context of application.”
...More
Book
David Harker;
(2015)
Creating Scientific Controversies: Uncertainty and Bias in Science and Society
(/isis/citation/CBB156153688/)
Article
A. Urry;
(2021)
Alfred Newton’s second-hand histories of extinction: Hearsay, gossip, misapprehension
(/isis/citation/CBB385478624/)
Thesis
Heller, Chaia L.;
(2005)
From Scientific Risk to Paysan Savoir-Faire: Divergent Rationalities of Science and Society in the French Debate over GM Crops
(/isis/citation/CBB001561883/)
Chapter
Vanderburgh, William L.;
(2009)
Theory Choice in the Historical Sciences: Geology as a Philosophical Case Study
(/isis/citation/CBB001021052/)
Book
George E. Smith;
Raghav Seth;
(2020)
Brownian Motion and Molecular Reality
(/isis/citation/CBB800777900/)
Article
Bovens, Luc;
Fitelson, Branden;
Hartmann, Stephan;
Snyder, Josh;
(2002)
Too Odd (Not) to Be True? A Reply to Olsson
(/isis/citation/CBB000410711/)
Book
Bonk, Thomas;
(2008)
Underdetermination: An Essay on Evidence and the Limits of Natural Knowledge
(/isis/citation/CBB000951767/)
Article
Sara Peres;
(2016)
Saving the gene pool for the future: Seed banks as archives
(/isis/citation/CBB133555994/)
Article
VOLKER HESS;
(2020)
Der Aphorismus als Wissenstechnik - The Aphorism as Technology of Knowing: Das Beispiel der „meteorologischen Medizin“ des frühen 18. Jahrhunderts
(/isis/citation/CBB297162528/)
Article
Michael T. Stuart;
(2021)
Telling Stories in Science: Feyerabend and Thought Experiments
(/isis/citation/CBB014785805/)
Book
Massimiliano Badino;
Gerardo Ienna;
Pietro Daniel Omodeo;
(2022)
Epistemologia storica: Correnti, temi e problemi
(/isis/citation/CBB773894451/)
Article
Alfonso Arroyo-Santos;
Mark E. Olson;
Francisco Vergara-Silva;
(2014)
Practice-Oriented Controversies and Borrowed Epistemic Credibility in Current Evolutionary Biology: Phylogeography as a Case Study
(/isis/citation/CBB826769138/)
Book
Schantz, Richard;
(2004)
Externalist Challenge
(/isis/citation/CBB000500355/)
Article
Rodolfo Garau;
(2020)
Gassendi's Critique of Astrology
(/isis/citation/CBB174175518/)
Article
Helen Anne Curry;
(2022)
Hybrid Seeds in History and Historiography
(/isis/citation/CBB907533787/)
Book
Smith-Howard, Kendra;
(2014)
Pure and Modern Milk: An Environmental History since 1900
(/isis/citation/CBB001452074/)
Thesis
Curry, Helen Anne;
(2012)
Accelerating Evolution, Engineering Life: American Agriculture and Technologies of Genetic Modification, 1925--1960
(/isis/citation/CBB001560996/)
Article
Kim, Jongyoung;
(2014)
The Networked Public, Multitentacled Participation, and Collaborative Expertise: US Beef and the Korean Candlelight Protest
(/isis/citation/CBB001450068/)
Article
Sablani, Shyam S.;
(2014)
75 Years of IFT: Food Engineering and Physical Properties, and Nanoscale Food Science, Engineering and Technology in JFS---1936 to Present
(/isis/citation/CBB001320874/)
Article
Sarathchandra, Dilshani;
Ten Eyck, Toby A.;
(2013)
To Tell the Truth: Keys in Newspaper Portrayals of the Public During Food Scares
(/isis/citation/CBB001320901/)
Be the first to comment!