(Mis)Understanding scientific disagreement: Success versus pursuit-worthiness in theory choice (2021)
Scientists often diverge widely when choosing between research programs. This can seem to be rooted in disagreements about which of several theories, competing to address shared questions or phenomena, is currently the most epistemically or explanatorily valuable—i.e. most successful. But many such cases are actually more directly rooted in differing judgments of pursuit-worthiness, concerning which theory will be best down the line, or which addresses the most significant data or questions. Using case studies from 16th-century astronomy and 20th-century geology and biology, I argue that divergent theory choice is thus often driven by considerations of scientific process, even where direct epistemic or explanatory evaluation of its final products appears more relevant. Broadly following Kuhn's analysis of theoretical virtues, I suggest that widely shared criteria for pursuit-worthiness function as imprecise, mutually-conflicting values. However, even Kuhn and others sensitive to pragmatic dimensions of theory ‘acceptance’, including the virtue of fruitfulness, still commonly understate the role of pursuit-worthiness—especially by exaggerating the impact of more present-oriented virtues, or failing to stress how ‘competing’ theories excel at addressing different questions or data. This framework clarifies the nature of the choice and competition involved in theory choice, and the role of alternative theoretical virtues.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Radin Dardashti;
(2021)
No-go Theorems: What Are They Good For?
(/isis/citation/CBB827243285/)
Article
Dietrich, Michael R.;
Skipper, Robert A., Jr.;
(2007)
Manipulating Underdetermination in Scientific Controversy: The Case of the Molecular Clock
(/isis/citation/CBB000830784/)
Book
Jochen Büttner;
(2019)
Swinging and Rolling: Unveiling Galileo's unorthodox path from a challenging problem to a new science
(/isis/citation/CBB548435869/)
Article
George Borg;
(2020)
On 'the application of science to science itself:' Chemistry, instruments, and the scientific labor process
(/isis/citation/CBB166777080/)
Article
Gordin, Michael D.;
Milam, Erika Lorraine;
(2012)
A Repository for More than Anecdote: Fifty Years of The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
(/isis/citation/CBB001252330/)
Book
Dascal, Marcelo;
Boantza, Victor D.;
(2011)
Controversies within the Scientific Revolution
(/isis/citation/CBB001250495/)
Article
Sturm, Thomas;
Mülberger, Annette;
(2012)
Crisis Discussions in Psychology---New Historical and Philosophical Perspectives
(/isis/citation/CBB001221625/)
Article
Casado, Carlo M. Madrid;
(2013)
Spain and the Scientific Revolution: State of the Art of a Century-Old Controversy
(/isis/citation/CBB001320135/)
Thesis
Vanderburgh, William L.;
(2001)
Dark matters in contemporary astrophysics: A case study in theory choice and evidential reasoning
(/isis/citation/CBB001562645/)
Article
Richard Dawid;
(2021)
The role of meta-empirical theory assessment in the acceptance of atomism
(/isis/citation/CBB703508661/)
Article
Cornelis Menke;
(2018)
The Whewell-Mill Debate on Predictions, from Mill's Point of View
(/isis/citation/CBB045518739/)
Article
Jorge Cañizares-Esguerra;
(2017)
On Ignored Global “Scientific Revolutions”
(/isis/citation/CBB557863061/)
Book
Martin Carrier;
Rebecca Mertens;
Carsten Reinhardt;
(2021)
Narratives and Comparisons: Adversaries or Allies in Understanding Science?
(/isis/citation/CBB733953616/)
Article
Agnes Bolinska;
Joseph D. Martin;
(2020)
Negotiating history: Contingency, canonicity, and case studies
(/isis/citation/CBB215794755/)
Book
Francesco Barreca;
(2017)
La scienza che fu: Idee e strumenti di teorie abbandonate
(/isis/citation/CBB185329347/)
Article
Daniel Špelda;
(2021)
Les anciens dans l’astronomie, l’astronomie dans la querelle des anciens et des modernes
(/isis/citation/CBB984258439/)
Article
Dyson, Freeman J.;
(2012)
Is Science Mostly Driven by Ideas or by Tools?
(/isis/citation/CBB001320450/)
Book
Cohen, H. Floris;
(2010)
Die zweite Erschaffung der Welt: Wie die moderne Naturwissenschaft entstand
(/isis/citation/CBB001035179/)
Book
Kindi, Vasso P.;
Arabatzis, Theodore;
(2012)
Kuhn's The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Revisited
(/isis/citation/CBB001421709/)
Essay Review
Maarten Van Dyck;
(2022)
Jochen Büttner, Swinging and Rolling: Unveiling Galileo's Unorthodox Path from a Challenging Problem to a New Science, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, 2019.
(/isis/citation/CBB028097226/)
Be the first to comment!