Article ID: CBB459425059

The environments of reproductive and birth defects research in the U.S. and West Germany (c. 1955–1975) (2022)

unapi

Most historiographies of the crossroads of environmental and reproductive health in 20th century start and end with the case of thalidomide. Despite its global scope, thalidomide today stands for sharp contrasts: in the numbers of victims, in institutional responses to the disaster, and also—more generally—in regulatory approaches to potential risks and national cultures of reproductive justice and disability rights. This paper takes a closer look at two countries that have been seen as emblematic of this divide in regulatory frameworks, despite similarities and interconnections in other areas, such as (pharma)industrial production, science, and robust feminist environmental health movements: the U.S. and West Germany. It argues that thalidomide needs to be historically contextualized within a broad framework of concepts and models of environment from research on exogenous reproductive effects. To do so, it reconstructs what counted as environment in research on reproductive health and birth defects in these two national settings in the postwar decades. It looks at transformations made across multifaceted initiatives, studying collective landscapes and workplaces as potentially dangerous “outer worlds,” as well as smaller scale and more individualized environments, i.e., the maternal metabolism, uterus, lifestyle, or social interactions. The article thereby aims to explicate concepts and debates about the environment that influenced later national divisions in politics of science and technology, hinting of the democratic challenges these posed.

...More
Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB459425059/

Similar Citations

Book Hampton, Jameel; (2016)
Disability and the Welfare State in Britain: Changes in Perception and Policy 1948-1979 (/isis/citation/CBB478296537/)

Article Martin, Aryn; Holloway, Kelly; (2014)
“Something There Is That Doesn't Love a Wall”: Histories of the Placental Barrier (/isis/citation/CBB001421096/)

Book Reagan, Leslie J.; (2010)
Dangerous Pregnancies: Mothers, Disabilities, and Abortion in Modern America (/isis/citation/CBB001023264/)

Book Sara Matthiesen; (2021)
Reproduction Reconceived: Family Making and the Limits of Choice after Roe v. Wade (/isis/citation/CBB740318677/)

Article Marcus, Gail H.; (Fall 2001)
Technology, Safety, Human Resources, and Nuclear Power (/isis/citation/CBB400599084/)

Chapter Elsbeth Bösl; (2014)
The Contergan Scandal: Media, Medicine, and Thalidomide in 1960s West Germany (/isis/citation/CBB578697680/)

Article Maud Anne Bracke; (2022)
Family Planning and Reproductive Agency in France: Demography, Gender, and Race, 1950s–1970s (/isis/citation/CBB639631222/)

Chapter Michaels, Paula A.; (2012)
Pain and Blame: Psychological Approaches to Obstetric Pain, 1950--1980 (/isis/citation/CBB001214272/)

Book Sandra Bärnreuther; (2021)
Substantial Relations: Making Global Reproductive Medicine in Postcolonial India (/isis/citation/CBB296718154/)

Book Miranda R. Waggoner; (2017)
The Zero Trimester: Pre-Pregnancy Care and the Politics of Reproductive Risk (/isis/citation/CBB589678157/)

Authors & Contributors
Gross, Dominik
Halfmann, Drew T.
Holloway, Kelly
Ignaciuk, Agata
Kinchy, Abby J.
Kleinman, Daniel Lee
Journals
Bulletin of the History of Medicine
The Bridge: Journal of the National Academy of Engineering
French Historical Studies
Isis: International Review Devoted to the History of Science and Its Cultural Influences
Osiris: A Research Journal Devoted to the History of Science and Its Cultural Influences
Science as Culture
Publishers
University of California Press
New York University
Cornell University Press
Policy Press
University of California, San Francisco
Concepts
Reproductive medicine
Obstetrics and pregnancy
Public policy
Medicine and society
Disabilities; disability; accessibility
Medicine and gender
People
Zeiss, Carl
Time Periods
20th century, late
20th century
21st century
20th century, early
Places
United States
West Germany
Great Britain
East Germany
India
Soviet Union
Institutions
Disablement Income Group (DIG)
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment