Why Continuous Motions Cannot Be Composed of Sub-motions: Aristotle on Change, Rest, and Actual and Potential Middles (2018)
Cohoe, Caleb (Author)
Apeiron: Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science
Volume: 51
Issue: 1
Pages: 37-71
I examine the reasons Aristotle presents in Physics VIII 8 for denying a crucial assumption of Zeno’s dichotomy paradox: that every motion is composed of sub-motions. Aristotle claims that a unified motion is divisible into motions only in potentiality (δυνάμει). If it were actually divided at some point, the mobile would need to have arrived at and then have departed from this point, and that would require some interval of rest. Commentators have generally found Aristotle’s reasoning unconvincing. Against David Bostock and Richard Sorabji, inter alia, I argue that Aristotle offers a plausible and internally consistent response to Zeno. I defend Aristotle’s reasoning by using his discussion of what to say about the mobile at boundary instants, transitions between change and rest. There Aristotle articulates what I call the Changes are Open, Rests are Closed Rule: what is true of something at a boundary instant is what is true of it over the time of its rest. By contrast, predications true of something over its period of change are not true of the thing at either of the boundary instants of that change. I argue that this rule issues from Aristotle’s general understanding of change, as laid out in Phys. III. It also fits well with Phys. VI, where Aristotle maintains that there is a first boundary instant included in the time of rest, but not a “first in which the mobile began to change.” I then show how this rule underlies Aristotle’s argument that a continuous motion cannot be composed of actual sub-motions. Aristotle distinguishes potential middles, points passed through en route to a terminus, from actual middles. The Changes are Open, Rests are Closed Rule only applies to actual middles, because only they are boundaries of change that the mobile must arrive at and then depart from. On my reading, Aristotle argues that the instant of arrival, the first instant at which the mobile has come to be at the actual middle, cannot belong to the time of the subsequent motion. If it did, the mobile would already be moving towards the next terminus and thus, per Phys. VI 6, would have already left. But it cannot have moved away from the midpoint at the very same moment it has arrived there. This means that the instant of arrival must be separated from the time of departure by an interval of rest. I show how Aristotle’s reasoning applies generally to rule out any continuous reflexive motion or continuous complex rectilinear motion. On my interpretation, however, the argument does not apply to every change of direction. When, as in the case of projectile motion, multiple movers and their relative powers explain why the mobile changes directions, distinct sub-motions are not involved. Aristotle holds that such motions cannot be continuous, not because they involve intervals of rest, but because they involve multiple causes of motion. My interpretation of the Changes are Open, Rests are Closed Rule allows us to make better sense of Aristotle’s argument than any previous interpretation.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Bowin, John;
(2010)
Aristotle on the Unity of Change: Five Reductio Arguments in Physics viii 8
(/isis/citation/CBB001211462/)
Article
Francisco J. Gonzalez;
(2023)
From Dunamis as Active/Passive Capacity to Dunamis as Nature in Aristotle’s Metaphysics Theta
(/isis/citation/CBB494981363/)
Article
Aparna Ravilochan;
(2023)
Unseating the Craftsman: Natural Efficient Cause in Aristotle's Craft Analogy
(/isis/citation/CBB309653260/)
Thesis
Anagnostopoulos, Andreas Harol;
(2007)
Aristotle on Change and Potentiality
(/isis/citation/CBB001561324/)
Article
Roark, Tony;
(2004)
Why Aristotle Says There Is No Time Without Change
(/isis/citation/CBB000502258/)
Article
Prince, Brian David;
(2014)
Physical Change in Plato's Timaeus
(/isis/citation/CBB001214195/)
Chapter
Monica Ugaglia;
(2015)
Peso e peso specifico in Aristotele
(/isis/citation/CBB175769107/)
Chapter
Gianni Micheli;
(2015)
I principi nelle diverse concezioni della meccanica antica
(/isis/citation/CBB961030464/)
Article
Coxhead, Michael A.;
(2012)
A Close Examination of the Pseudo-Aristotelian Mechanical Problems: The Homology between Mechanics and Poetry as techne
(/isis/citation/CBB001221687/)
Article
Emiliano Paparazzo;
(2023)
Aristotle's Threefold Conception of Fire in Meteor. I-III
(/isis/citation/CBB909751333/)
Book
Lang, Helen S.;
(1998)
The Order of Nature in Aristotle's Physics: Place and the Elements
(/isis/citation/CBB000330552/)
Book
Kouremenos, Theokritos;
(2002)
The Proportions in Aristotle's “Physics 7.5”
(/isis/citation/CBB000302260/)
Chapter
Brisson, Luc;
(2005)
La théorie de la “matière” dans le Timée de Platon et sa critique par Aristote dans la Physique
(/isis/citation/CBB000775234/)
Article
Gregory, Andrew;
(2001)
Aristotle, Dynamics and Proportionality
(/isis/citation/CBB000773916/)
Book
Dudley, John;
(2012)
Aristotle's Concept of Chance: Accidents, Cause, Necessity, and Determinism
(/isis/citation/CBB001201754/)
Article
Kelsey, Sean;
(2010)
Hylomorphism in Aristotle's Physics
(/isis/citation/CBB001211443/)
Article
Schemmel, Matthias;
(2014)
Medieval Representations of Change and Their Early Modern Application
(/isis/citation/CBB001201190/)
Book
Alexander N. Gabrovsky;
(2015)
Chaucer the Alchemist: Physics, Mutability, and the Medieval Imagination
(/isis/citation/CBB805816624/)
Article
David Marshall Miller;
(2017)
The Parallelogram Rule from Pseudo-Aristotle to Newton
(/isis/citation/CBB764126498/)
Chapter
Diana Quarantotto;
(2022)
L'universo liquido: Aristotele e la fisica nell'acqua
(/isis/citation/CBB465937986/)
Ancient Philosophy
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
Physis: Rivista Internazionale di Storia della Scienza
Foundations of Science
Early Science and Medicine: A Journal for the Study of Science, Technology and Medicine in the Pre-modern Period
Be the first to comment!