As Roger Ariew shows, one of the most fascinating challenges for the authors trying to create a Cartesian complete course on philosophy was coming up with a Cartesian Logic based on the existing texts of the master (Ariew 2014). Were the few simple rules from the Discourse on Method the "logic" of Descartes? Were the Rules for the Direction of the Mind "logic"? How can we even have a logic without syllogism? When looking at the authors studied by Ariew one finds that the best that they could come up was adding some Cartesian elements on what remains basically a traditional Aristotelian Logic. It seems that there was no Cartesian Logic after all. I want to show here that Cartesian Logic is something else, not exactly "Logic" in the way that was taught in the first year of college, but something meant to replace Aristotelian Logic once we have done away with syllogism. A treatise such as the Rules for the Direction of the Mind belongs to a new genre, one that comes out of the transformation of Aristotelian Logic in the early seventeenth century. I call this genre the "Art of discourse." In the Cartesian corpus the most complete incarnation of this genre is to be found in the (incomplete) Regulae; the preface written for the Essays of 1637, the Discourse on Method, while containing some elements of the art of discourse such as the famous "rules," remains a preface and not a systematic treatise.
...MoreBook Ariew, Roger (2014) Descartes and the First Cartesians.
Essay Review
Tad M. Schmaltz;
(2018)
French Cartesian Scholasticism: Remarks on Descartes and the First Cartesians
(/isis/citation/CBB407597122/)
Essay Review
Domenico Collacciani;
(2018)
A Contextualist History of Cartesian Philosophy: Roger Ariew's Descartes and the First Cartesians
(/isis/citation/CBB018190213/)
Essay Review
Martine Pécharman;
(2018)
Roger Ariew and "The First Cartesians"
(/isis/citation/CBB665136789/)
Essay Review
Sophie Roux;
(2018)
Everything You Always Wanted to Know About the Summa quadripartita that Descartes Never Wrote
(/isis/citation/CBB726490017/)
Article
Han Thomas Adriaenssen;
(2015)
The Radical Cartesianism of Robert Desgabets and the Scholastic Heritage
(/isis/citation/CBB659205412/)
Article
Gary Hatfield;
(2017)
Descartes: New Thoughts on the Senses
(/isis/citation/CBB088587028/)
Book
Schmaltz, Tad M.;
(2002)
Radical Cartesianism: The French Reception of Descartes
(/isis/citation/CBB000302043/)
Article
Roger Ariew;
(2021)
The Nature of Cartesian Logic
(/isis/citation/CBB365786343/)
Book
Andrea Strazzoni;
(2018)
Dutch Cartesianism and the Birth of Philosophy of Science: A Reappraisal of the Function of Philosophy from Regius to 's Gravesande 1640-1750
(/isis/citation/CBB727294343/)
Book
El-Rouayheb, Khaled;
(2010)
Relational Syllogisms and the History of Arabic Logic, 900--1900
(/isis/citation/CBB001200952/)
Article
Correia, Manuel;
(2009)
The Syllogistic Theory of Boethius
(/isis/citation/CBB001211442/)
Article
Evra, James Van;
(2000)
The Development of Logic as Reflected in the Fate of the Syllogism, 1600--1900
(/isis/citation/CBB000300863/)
Article
Andrea Sangiacomo;
(2019)
Modelling the History of Early Modern Natural Philosophy: The Fate of the Art-Nature Distinction in the Dutch Universities
(/isis/citation/CBB246385847/)
Book
Le Grand, Antoine;
(2003)
Entire Body of Philosophy, According to the Principles of the Famous Renate Descartes
(/isis/citation/CBB000320276/)
Chapter
David Luscombe;
(2010)
Crossing Philosophical Boundaries c. 1150–c. 1250
(/isis/citation/CBB119071619/)
Article
Brockliss, Laurence;
(2006)
The Moment of No Return: The University of Paris and the Death of Aristotelianism
(/isis/citation/CBB000671070/)
Article
Blank, Andreas;
(2010)
Material Souls and Imagination in Late Aristotelian Embryology
(/isis/citation/CBB000954801/)
Book
Ott, Walter R.;
(2009)
Causation and Laws of Nature in Early Modern Philosophy
(/isis/citation/CBB001033000/)
Chapter
Ruler, Han van;
(2008)
Substituting Aristotle: Platonic Themes in Dutch Cartesianism
(/isis/citation/CBB000760516/)
Article
Denis, Gilles;
(2011)
The Optical Galilean Interpretation of the Antique Theophrastian Model for Plant Diseases
(/isis/citation/CBB001450796/)
Be the first to comment!