Article ID: CBB443117651

The European politics of animal experimentation: From Victorian Britain to ‘Stop Vivisection’ (2017)

unapi

This paper identifies a common political struggle behind debates on the validity and permissibility of animal experimentation, through an analysis of two recent European case studies: the Italian implementation of the European Directive 2010/63/EC regulating the use of animals in science, and the recent European Citizens' Initiative (ECI) 'Stop Vivisection'. Drawing from a historical parallel with Victorian antivivisectionism, we highlight important threads in our case studies that mark the often neglected specificities of debates on animal experimentation. From the representation of the sadistic scientist in the XIX century, to his/her claimed capture by vested interests and evasion of public scrutiny in the contemporary cases, we show that animals are not simply the focus of the debate, but also a privileged locus at which much broader issues are being raised about science, its authority, accountability and potential misalignment with public interest. By highlighting this common socio-political conflict underlying public controversies around animal experimentation, our work prompts the exploration of modes of authority and argumentation that, in establishing the usefulness of animals in science, avoid reenacting the traditional divide between epistemic and political fora.

...More
Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB443117651/

Similar Citations

Book Guerrini, Anita; (2003)
Experimenting with Humans and Animals: From Galen to Animal Rights (/isis/citation/CBB000330970/)

Article Machado, Carlos José Saldanha; Filipecki, Ana Tereza Pinto; Teixeira, Márcia de Oliveira; Klein, Helena Espellet; (2010)
A regulação do uso de animais no Brasil do século XX e o processo de formação do atual regime aplicado à pesquisa biomédica (/isis/citation/CBB001420444/)

Book Rudacille, Deborah; (2000)
The Scalpel and the Butterfly: The Conflict Between Animal Research and Animal Protection (/isis/citation/CBB000101123/)

Chapter Guerrini, Anita; (2008)
Animal Experiments and Anitvivisection Debates in the 1820s (/isis/citation/CBB000760393/)

Article Preece, Rod; (2003)
Darwinism, Christianity, and the Great Vivisection Debate (/isis/citation/CBB000774479/)

Article Shira Shmuely; (2020)
Curare: The Poisoned Arrow that Entered the Laboratory and Sparked a Moral Debate (/isis/citation/CBB410699994/)

Thesis Shira Dina Shmuely; (2017)
The Bureaucracy of Empathy: Vivisection and the Question of Animal Pain in Britain, 1876-1912 (/isis/citation/CBB762286081/)

Article Beregoy, Natalia E.; (2009)
Charles Darwin, Vivisection and the History of Victorian Science (/isis/citation/CBB001421097/)

Article Finn, Michael A.; Stark, James F.; (2015)
Medical Science and the Cruelty to Animals Act 1876: A Re-Examination of Anti-Vivisectionism in Provincial Britain (/isis/citation/CBB001422111/)

Article Hua, Julietta; Ahuja, Neel; (2013)
Chimpanzee Sanctuary: “Surplus” Life and the Politics of Transspecies Care (/isis/citation/CBB001201820/)

Article Beaufays, Joseph-Paul; (2005)
L'animal au service de l'homme? (/isis/citation/CBB000670013/)

Thesis Weigand, Amy; (2008)
Becoming Human: Stories of Animals and Ethics in Biomedicine (/isis/citation/CBB001561224/)

Article Lee, Jack; (2008)
How Should Animals Be Treated? (/isis/citation/CBB001031197/)

Authors & Contributors
Shmuely, Shira Dina
Guerrini, Anita
Francesca Orestano
Holmes, Tarquin
Weigand, Amy
Waizbort, Ricardo
Concepts
Animal experimentation
Science and ethics
Animal rights
Vivisection
Biology and ethics; bioethics
Controversies and disputes
Time Periods
19th century
20th century, early
20th century
Modern
21st century
Places
Great Britain
England
United States
United Kingdom
Germany
Europe
Institutions
Royal Commission on Vivisection (1875)
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment