As part of their defence of evolutionary theory, T. H. Huxley and Herbert Spencer argued that natural history was no longer a legitimate scientific discipline. They outlined a secularized concept of life from biology to argue for the validity of naturalism. Despite their support for naturalism, they offered two different responses to the decline of natural history. Whereas Huxley emphasized the creation of a biological discipline, and all that that entailed, Spencer was more concerned with constructing an entire intellectual system based on the idea of evolution. In effect, Spencer wanted to create a new scientific worldview based on evolutionary theory. This had consequences for their understanding of human history, especially of how science had evolved through the ages. It affected their conceptions of human agency, contingency, and directionality in history. Examining Huxley's and Spencer's responses to the “end” of natural history reveals some of the deep divisions within scientific naturalism and the inherent problems of naturalism in general. Whereas Huxley chose to separate the natural and the historical, Spencer opted to fuse them into a single system.
...More
Article
Peter Harrison;
(2016)
What was historical about natural history? Contingency and explanation in the science of living things
(/isis/citation/CBB972800240/)
Article
Lanaro, Giorgio;
(1992)
Il giardino della civiltà: Thomas Henry Huxley e “l'etica dell'evoluzione”
(/isis/citation/CBB000059376/)
Book
Lightman, Bernard;
(2009)
Evolutionary Naturalism in Victorian Britain: The “Darwinians” and Their Critics
(/isis/citation/CBB000951742/)
Book
Sepkoski, David;
(2012)
Rereading the Fossil Record: The Growth of Paleobiology as an Evolutionary Discipline
(/isis/citation/CBB001210043/)
Article
Gondermann, Thomas;
(2007)
Progression and Retrogression: Herbert Spencer's Explanations of Social Inequality
(/isis/citation/CBB000773673/)
Article
Kenny, Robert;
(2007)
From the Curse of Ham to the Curse of Nature: The Influence of Natural Selection on the Debate on Human Unity before the Publication of The Descent of Man
(/isis/citation/CBB000773014/)
Book
Francis, Mark;
(2007)
Herbert Spencer and the Invention of Modern Life
(/isis/citation/CBB000774196/)
Chapter
Ruse, Michael;
(2004)
Adaptive Landscapes and Dynamic Equilibrium: The Spencerian Contribution to Twentieth-Century American Evolutionary Biology
(/isis/citation/CBB000520042/)
Book
Lyons, Sherrie L.;
(1999)
Thomas Henry Huxley: The evolution of a scientist
(/isis/citation/CBB000111745/)
Book
Cosans, Christopher E.;
(2009)
Owen's Ape and Darwin's Bulldog: Beyond Darwinism and Creationism
(/isis/citation/CBB000951052/)
Essay Review
Lyons, Sherrie;
(1999)
In Search of Huxley the Scientist
(/isis/citation/CBB000110364/)
Article
Hale, Piers J.;
(2003)
Labor and the Human Relationship with Nature: The Naturalization of Politics in the Work of Thomas Henry Huxley, Herbert George Wells, and William Morris
(/isis/citation/CBB000340700/)
Essay Review
Zakariya, Nasser;
(2013)
Is History Still a Fraud?
(/isis/citation/CBB001566298/)
Article
José Morgado Pereira;
(2018)
Psychiatry in Portugal: Key actors and conceptual history (1884–1924)
(/isis/citation/CBB603070872/)
Book
Dover, Gabriel;
(2000)
Dear Mr. Darwin: Letters on the Evolution of Life and Human Nature
(/isis/citation/CBB000111735/)
Chapter
Engels, Eve-Marie;
(2009)
Charles Darwins geheimnisvolle Revolution
(/isis/citation/CBB001023713/)
Book
Jones, Jeannette Eileen;
Sharp, Patrick B.;
(2010)
Darwin in Atlantic Cultures: Evolutionary Visions of Race, Gender, and Sexuality
(/isis/citation/CBB001033825/)
Book
Michael Davis;
(2006)
George Eliot and Nineteenth-Century Psychology: Exploring the Unmapped Country
(/isis/citation/CBB890472950/)
Book
Ruth Barton;
(2018)
The X Club: Power and Authority in Victorian Science
(/isis/citation/CBB960742427/)
Chapter
Zappen, James P.;
(1991)
Scientific rhetoric in the 19th and early 20th centuries: Herbert Spencer, Thomas H. Huxley, and John Dewey
(/isis/citation/CBB000063590/)
Be the first to comment!