Hype, or simplified and sensationalised science, appears to be inescapable in science communication with examples extending from viral social media accounts and ‘breakthrough’-themed press releases, to the mediated claims of the celebrity scientist. In science communication, the negative effects of hype are familiar. The question is whether hype is always a distortion and a lie, or can it be redeemed? This essay reviews the contribution of hype to science, specifically in terms of encouraging reflexivity for science and technology. I present three perspectives on hype and invite further conversation on the role of hype in science communication.
...More
Article
Peter Weingart;
(2022)
Trust or attention? Medialization of science revisited
(/isis/citation/CBB096910888/)
Article
Sophie Ritson;
(August 2016)
‘Crackpots’ and ‘active researchers’: The controversy over links between arXiv and the scientific blogosphere
(/isis/citation/CBB402774757/)
Article
Esa Väliverronen;
Sampsa Saikkonen;
(November 2021)
Freedom of Expression Challenged: Scientists’ Perspectives on Hidden Forms of Suppression and Self-censorship
(/isis/citation/CBB818104236/)
Article
Monica Kidd;
(2021)
“If We Can Make a Cure of Him”: Lyrical Grenfell in the St. Anthony Casebooks, 1906
(/isis/citation/CBB185593177/)
Article
Alan James Hogarth;
Michael Witmore;
(2020)
Reflexive witnessing: Boyle, the Royal Society and scientific style
(/isis/citation/CBB913351233/)
Book
Miira B. Hill;
(2022)
The New Art of Old Public Science Communication: The Science Slam
(/isis/citation/CBB847395771/)
Article
Schirrmacher, Arne;
(2013)
Popular Science as Cultural Dispositif: On the German Way of Science Communication in the Twentieth Century
(/isis/citation/CBB001320570/)
Article
Vincent, Bernadette Bensaude;
(2014)
The Politics of Buzzwords at the Interface of Technoscience, Market and Society: The Case of “Public Engagement in Science”
(/isis/citation/CBB001420060/)
Article
Marga Vicedo;
Denis M. Walsh;
(2020)
Entanglements between language, science, and worldviews
(/isis/citation/CBB021415769/)
Article
Stefan Helmreich;
(2020)
Not a metaphor: A comment on Evelyn Fox Keller’s ‘cognitive functions of metaphor in the natural sciences’
(/isis/citation/CBB262166685/)
Thesis
Webster, Elizabeth E.;
(cited 2011)
American Science and the Pursuit of "Useful Knowledge" in the Polite Eighteenth Century, 1750--1806
(/isis/citation/CBB001561055/)
Book
Curtis N. Johnson;
(2019)
Darwin's Historical Sketch: An Examination of the 'Preface' to the Origin of Species
(/isis/citation/CBB352478446/)
Article
Evelyn Fox Keller;
(2020)
In gratitude
(/isis/citation/CBB460888344/)
Article
Willard McCarty;
(2020)
Editorial, Making Sense of Metaphor: Evelyn Fox Keller and Commentators on Language and Science
(/isis/citation/CBB072956224/)
Thesis
Cahill, Maria J.;
(2009)
“The Stars Belong to Everyone”: The Rhetorical Practices of Astronomer and Science Writer Dr. Helen Sawyer Hogg (1905--1993)
(/isis/citation/CBB001562858/)
Article
Benjamin K. Sovacool;
M. V. Ramana;
(2015)
Back to the Future: Small Modular Reactors, Nuclear Fantasies, and Symbolic Convergence
(/isis/citation/CBB741146502/)
Article
Tom McLeish;
(2020)
A meta-metaphor for science: The true and the fictional within the book of nature
(/isis/citation/CBB540155597/)
Article
Matteo Cosci;
(2018)
Le fonti di Galileo Galilei per le Lezioni e studi sulla stella nuova del 1604
(/isis/citation/CBB222358768/)
Article
Thomasen, Laura Søvsø;
(2009)
Darwinist, men hvilken darwinist? Videnskabsideologi og litterære virkemidler i J.P. Jacobsens populærvidenskabelige artikler
(/isis/citation/CBB001022221/)
Article
Richard Doyle;
(2020)
Jumping concepts and other transpositions: The Keller effect in/on discourses of living systems
(/isis/citation/CBB958906434/)
Be the first to comment!