W. John Koolage (Author)
Lauren Williams (Author)
Morgen L. Barroso (Author)
In the United States, scientific knowledge is brought before the courts by way of testimony – the testimony of scientific experts. We argue that this expertise is best understood first as related to the quality of the underlying science and then in terms of who delivers it. Bloodstain pattern analysis (BPA), a contemporary forensic science, serves as the vaulting point for our exploration of objectivity as a metric for the quality of a science in judicial contexts. We argue that BPA fails to meet the minimal standard set by Helen Longino’s social-procedural account of objectivity (1990, 2002). In light of some pressing issues for social-procedural accounts, we offer an infrastructural account of objectivity. This account offers what amounts to a friendly amendment to Longino’s account and adds to the ways in which we might analyze social-procedural objectivity. Finally, we address an issue that is pressing in the legal context: given that scientific knowledge is delivered by individuals, not communities, at least in U.S. courts, we (may) need a way to evaluate individual scientific and epistemic agents. We suggest a means for making this evaluation that is derived from our infrastructural account of objectivity.
...More
Article
Hannah Pullen-Blasnik;
Gil Eyal;
Amy Weissenbach;
(2024)
‘Is your accuser me, or is it the software?’ Ambiguity and contested expertise in probabilistic DNA profiling
Article
Federico Brandmayr;
(May 2017)
How Social Scientists Make Causal Claims in Court: Evidence from the L’Aquila Trial
Book
Willemijn Ruberg;
Lara Bergers;
Pauline Dirven;
Sara Serrano Martínez;
(2023)
Forensic cultures in modern Europe
Chapter
Alison Adam;
Willemijn Ruberg;
Lara Bergers;
Pauline Dirven;
Sara Serrano Martínez;
(2023)
Blood will out: blood typing, forensic culture and gender in a 1950s Scottish paternity case
Article
Kruse, Corinna;
(October 2013)
The Bayesian approach to forensic evidence: Evaluating, communicating, and distributing responsibility
Article
Marcus B. Carrier;
(2021)
The Making of Evident Expertise: Transforming Chemical Analytical Methods into Judicial Evidence
Article
Papadopoulos, Dimitris;
(April 2011)
Alter-ontologies: Towards a constituent politics in technoscience
Article
Victor Toom;
(July 2016)
Whose Body Is It? Technolegal Materialization of Victims’ Bodies and Remains after the World Trade Center Terrorist Attacks
Book
Saumitra Basu;
(2021)
The History of Forensic Science in India
Article
M'charek, Amade;
Hagendijk, Rob;
Vries, Wiebe de;
(2013)
Equal before the Law: On the Machinery of Sameness in Forensic DNA Practice
Book
Laybourn, Keith;
Taylor, David;
(2011)
Policing in England and Wales, 1918--39: The Fed, Flying Squads and Forensics
Article
Bachhiesl, Christian;
(2010)
Blutspuren. Zur Bedeutung des Blutes in der Kriminalwissenschaft um 1900
Article
Winter, Alison;
(2007)
A Forensics of the Mind
Article
Mülberger, Annette;
(2009)
Teaching Psychology to Jurists: Initiatives and Reactions Prior to World War I
Article
Kieval, Hillel J.;
(2012)
The Rules of the Game: Forensic Medicine and the Language of Science in the Structuring of Modern Ritual Murder Trials
Chapter
Rodriguez, Julia Emilia;
(2014)
South Atlantic Crossings: Fingerprints, Science, and the State in Turn-of-the-Twentieth-Century Argentina
Article
Xin-zhe Xie;
(2023)
Administration of Perception: Observing and Transcribing Dead Bodies in the Forensic Methodology of Qing China (1644–1912)
Article
Heather Wolffram;
(2015)
“God Save Us from Psychologists as Expert Witnesses”: The Battle for Forensic Psychology in Early Twentieth-Century Germany.
Article
Daphne Rozenblatt;
(2017)
Scientific Expertise and the Politics of Emotions in the 1902 Trial of Giuseppe Musolino
Article
Helena Machado;
Susana Silva;
(2015)
Public Perspectives on Risks and Benefits of Forensic DNA Databases: An Approach to the Influence of Professional Group, Education, and Age
Be the first to comment!