Over the last few decades, our theories of fundamental physics have become increasingly detached from empirical data. Recently, Richard Dawid has argued that the progressive separation of theory from experiment is concomitant with a number of changes in the methodology of the discipline. More precisely, Dawid has argued that the new methods of fundamental physics amount to a form of non-empirical confirmation, and that physical theories may therefore be confirmed even in the absence of empirical data. In this paper, I critically engage with Dawid's views on non-empirical physics. My main target is the excessively central role that, in my view, the notion of non-empirical confirmation plays on Dawid's analysis. I will therefore argue that, while non-empirical methods may legitimately be employed in physics, those are not always deployed with the purpose of confirming scientific theories. Non-empirical arguments may also be used in order to ground pragmatic choices regarding what theories deserve to be further developed—and this is an aspect of the work that non-empirical methods perform that cannot be solely understood in terms of Dawid's notion of non-empirical confirmation. I support these claims by making use of a case-study from the early history of particle physics. The case-study concerns a theory of the strong force that J. J. Sakurai introduced in 1960. As we shall see, both the genesis of Sakurai's theory as well as the arguments that he used to defend it provide direct support for my own views on the role that non-empirical methods play in physics. Finally, I conclude the paper by introducing a notion that I believe is useful in making sense of the manner in which the pragmatic and the epistemic dimensions of non-empirical reasoning relate to each other, namely the notion of a cognitive attitude.
...More
Article
Pilpel, Avital;
(2007)
Statistics Is Not Enough: Revisiting Ronald A. Fisher's Critique (1936) of Mendel's Experimental Results (1866)
(/isis/citation/CBB000830396/)
Chapter
Daston, Lorraine;
(2010)
The Empire of Observation, 1600--1800
(/isis/citation/CBB001221449/)
Article
Nora Hangel;
Christopher ChoGlueck;
(2023)
On the pursuitworthiness of qualitative methods in empirical philosophy of science
(/isis/citation/CBB960529736/)
Article
Rune Nyrup;
(2020)
Of Water Drops and Atomic Nuclei: Analogies and Pursuit Worthiness in Science
(/isis/citation/CBB558276725/)
Article
Milutin Stojanovic;
(2023)
Pursuitworthiness in urgent research: Lessons on well-ordered science from sustainability science
(/isis/citation/CBB831206486/)
Book
Harper, William L.;
(2011)
Isaac Newton's Scientific Method: Turning Data into Evidence about Gravity and Cosmology
(/isis/citation/CBB001221264/)
Book
Brain, Robert Michael;
Cohen, R. S.;
Knudsen, Ole;
(2007)
Hans Christian Ørsted and the Romantic Legacy in Science: Ideas, Disciplines, Practices
(/isis/citation/CBB000773725/)
Article
Vreese, Leen De;
(2008)
Causal (Mis)understanding and the Search for Scientific Explanations: A Case Study from the History of Medicine
(/isis/citation/CBB000830434/)
Article
Collins, H. M.;
(2003)
Lead into Gold: The Science of Finding Nothing
(/isis/citation/CBB000340897/)
Article
Piccinini, Gualtiero;
(2003)
Epistemic Divergence and the Publicity of Scientific Methods
(/isis/citation/CBB000340893/)
Thesis
Mayo, Lee Allen;
(2011)
Simulation without Replication: How Some Digital Computer Simulations Serve as Scientific Experiments
(/isis/citation/CBB001567307/)
Article
Rey, Anne-Lise;
(2013)
The Status of Leibniz' Medical Experiments: A Provisional Empiricism?
(/isis/citation/CBB001213581/)
Book
Barry Allen;
(2020)
Empiricisms: Experience and Experiment from Antiquity to the Anthropocene
(/isis/citation/CBB760356523/)
Chapter
Sibum, H. Otto;
(2008)
Machines, Bats, and Scholars: Experimental Knowledge in the Late Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries
(/isis/citation/CBB000831245/)
Article
Finocchiaro, Maurice A.;
(2010)
Defending Copernicus and Galileo: Critical Reasoning and the Ship Experiment
(/isis/citation/CBB001032221/)
Book
Donovan O. Schaefer;
(2022)
Wild Experiment: Feeling Science and Secularism after Darwin
(/isis/citation/CBB075181940/)
Book
Maurice A. Finocchiaro;
(2021)
Science, Method, and Argument in Galileo: Philosophical, Historical, and Historiographical Essays
(/isis/citation/CBB922757604/)
Article
Dodick, Jeff;
Argamon, Shlomo;
Chase, Paul;
(2009)
Understanding Scientific Methodology in the Historical and Experimental Sciences via Language Analysis
(/isis/citation/CBB001032839/)
Book
James Elwick;
(2007)
Styles of Reasoning in the British Life Sciences: Shared Assumptions, 1820–1858
(/isis/citation/CBB879149810/)
Article
Peter Achinstein;
(2023)
Disregarding evidence: Reasonable options for Newton and Rutherford?
(/isis/citation/CBB649526523/)
Be the first to comment!