Article ID: CBB430659500

Confirmation, or pursuit-worthiness? Lessons from J. J. Sakurai's 1960 theory of the strong force for the debate on non-empirical physics (2023)

unapi

Over the last few decades, our theories of fundamental physics have become increasingly detached from empirical data. Recently, Richard Dawid has argued that the progressive separation of theory from experiment is concomitant with a number of changes in the methodology of the discipline. More precisely, Dawid has argued that the new methods of fundamental physics amount to a form of non-empirical confirmation, and that physical theories may therefore be confirmed even in the absence of empirical data. In this paper, I critically engage with Dawid's views on non-empirical physics. My main target is the excessively central role that, in my view, the notion of non-empirical confirmation plays on Dawid's analysis. I will therefore argue that, while non-empirical methods may legitimately be employed in physics, those are not always deployed with the purpose of confirming scientific theories. Non-empirical arguments may also be used in order to ground pragmatic choices regarding what theories deserve to be further developed—and this is an aspect of the work that non-empirical methods perform that cannot be solely understood in terms of Dawid's notion of non-empirical confirmation. I support these claims by making use of a case-study from the early history of particle physics. The case-study concerns a theory of the strong force that J. J. Sakurai introduced in 1960. As we shall see, both the genesis of Sakurai's theory as well as the arguments that he used to defend it provide direct support for my own views on the role that non-empirical methods play in physics. Finally, I conclude the paper by introducing a notion that I believe is useful in making sense of the manner in which the pragmatic and the epistemic dimensions of non-empirical reasoning relate to each other, namely the notion of a cognitive attitude.

...More
Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB430659500/

Similar Citations

Chapter Daston, Lorraine; (2010)
The Empire of Observation, 1600--1800 (/isis/citation/CBB001221449/)

Article Nora Hangel; Christopher ChoGlueck; (2023)
On the pursuitworthiness of qualitative methods in empirical philosophy of science (/isis/citation/CBB960529736/)

Article Rune Nyrup; (2020)
Of Water Drops and Atomic Nuclei: Analogies and Pursuit Worthiness in Science (/isis/citation/CBB558276725/)

Article Milutin Stojanovic; (2023)
Pursuitworthiness in urgent research: Lessons on well-ordered science from sustainability science (/isis/citation/CBB831206486/)

Book Harper, William L.; (2011)
Isaac Newton's Scientific Method: Turning Data into Evidence about Gravity and Cosmology (/isis/citation/CBB001221264/)

Book Brain, Robert Michael; Cohen, R. S.; Knudsen, Ole; (2007)
Hans Christian Ørsted and the Romantic Legacy in Science: Ideas, Disciplines, Practices (/isis/citation/CBB000773725/)

Article Collins, H. M.; (2003)
Lead into Gold: The Science of Finding Nothing (/isis/citation/CBB000340897/)

Article Piccinini, Gualtiero; (2003)
Epistemic Divergence and the Publicity of Scientific Methods (/isis/citation/CBB000340893/)

Article Rey, Anne-Lise; (2013)
The Status of Leibniz' Medical Experiments: A Provisional Empiricism? (/isis/citation/CBB001213581/)

Book Barry Allen; (2020)
Empiricisms: Experience and Experiment from Antiquity to the Anthropocene (/isis/citation/CBB760356523/)

Article Finocchiaro, Maurice A.; (2010)
Defending Copernicus and Galileo: Critical Reasoning and the Ship Experiment (/isis/citation/CBB001032221/)

Book Donovan O. Schaefer; (2022)
Wild Experiment: Feeling Science and Secularism after Darwin (/isis/citation/CBB075181940/)

Book Maurice A. Finocchiaro; (2021)
Science, Method, and Argument in Galileo: Philosophical, Historical, and Historiographical Essays (/isis/citation/CBB922757604/)

Article Dodick, Jeff; Argamon, Shlomo; Chase, Paul; (2009)
Understanding Scientific Methodology in the Historical and Experimental Sciences via Language Analysis (/isis/citation/CBB001032839/)

Book James Elwick; (2007)
Styles of Reasoning in the British Life Sciences: Shared Assumptions, 1820–1858 (/isis/citation/CBB879149810/)

Article Peter Achinstein; (2023)
Disregarding evidence: Reasonable options for Newton and Rutherford? (/isis/citation/CBB649526523/)

Authors & Contributors
Finocchiaro, Maurice A.
Achinstein, Peter
Allen, Barry
Argamon, Shlomo
Brain, Robert Michael
Chase, Paul
Journals
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
Early Science and Medicine: A Journal for the Study of Science, Technology and Medicine in the Pre-modern Period
Review of Metaphysics
Science and Education
Publishers
Oxford University Press
Duke University Press
Springer
University of Notre Dame
University of Pittsburgh Press
Springer International Publishing
Concepts
Methodology of science; scientific method
Philosophy of science
Experiments and experimentation
Reasoning in science
Empiricism
Science and religion
People
Galilei, Galileo
Newton, Isaac
Bachstrom, Johann Friedrich
Beddoes, Thomas
Copernicus, Nicolaus
Kant, Immanuel
Time Periods
17th century
19th century
18th century
20th century, late
16th century
20th century, early
Places
Great Britain
Denmark
Italy
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment