IsisCB Explore

Article ID: CBB417241096

The Roles of Institutional Trust and Distrust in Grounding Rational Deference to Scientific Expertise (2016)

Bouchard, Frédéric (Author)

Perspectives on Science
Volume: 24
Issue: 5
Pages: 582-608

URI: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/628782

Outside Links

WorldCat

Google Scholar

JSTOR

Academia.edu

Expertise Science and politics Controversies and disputes Trust 21st century 20th century, late

Debates about climate change, genetically modified crops, and immunization have both strengthened for many the necessity to appeal to some form of scientific expertise while at the same time relativizing for others the epistemic authority of its claims. Scholars have offered diagnoses of this phenomenon. Their contribution has focused mostly on describing how expertise is marshalled, not why it is epistemically legitimate to invoke it. I will focus instead on two type of contributions that focus on the latter: some (e.g., John Hardwig, Naomi Scheman, Heidi Grasswick) offer moral underpinnings for expertise based on trust in individual experts, while others (e.g., Alvin Goldman) offer an epistemic analysis of the reasons why it is sometimes reasonable to defer to scientific expertise regardless of trust in individuals. I will argue that both these “trust-centered” and “assessment-centered” accounts of expertise are partially right but that in order to develop a general theory of rational deference to experts, one needs to include the epistemic benefits of both trust and distrust. Using Michel Blais’ and Robert Merton’s work, I will argue that rational deference to experts based on institutionally organized skepticism about experts’ claims offers a better account of deference to expertise than rational trust in individual experts: deference to expertise should be grounded in trust in scientific institutions, not trust in individual experts.

...More

Citation URI

https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB417241096/

Citations Indexes

Similar Citations

Book Gil Eyal; (2019)
The Crisis of Expertise (/isis/citation/CBB193528078/)

Article Sheldon Krimsky; (November 2015)
An Illusory Consensus behind GMO Health Assessment (/isis/citation/CBB119149138/)

Article Caitlin Donahue Wylie; (March 2018)
Trust in Technicians in Paleontology Laboratories (/isis/citation/CBB439482778/)

Article Shobita Parthasarathy; (2022)
How to Be an Epistemic Trespasser (/isis/citation/CBB968694595/)

Article Hindmarsh, Richard; (2014)
Hot Air Ablowin! “Media-Speak”, Social Conflict, and the Australian “Decoupled” Wind Farm Controversy (/isis/citation/CBB001421171/)

Article Randalls, Samuel; (2010)
History of the 2ºC Climate Target (/isis/citation/CBB001221297/)

Article Jamison, Andrew; (2010)
Climate Change Knowledge and Social Movement Theory (/isis/citation/CBB001221292/)

Article Almeida, Carla; DalCol, Franciane Lovati; Massarani, Luisa; (2013)
Controvérsia científica no telejornalismo brasileiro: um estudo sobre a cobertura das células-tronco no Jornal Nacional (/isis/citation/CBB001420697/)

Book Berezow, Alex B.; Campbell, Hank; (2012)
Science Left Behind: Feel-Good Fallacies and the Rise of the Anti-Scientific Left (/isis/citation/CBB001213203/)

Article Hecht, David K.; (2012)
How to Make a Villain: Rachel Carson and the Politics of Anti-Environmentalism (/isis/citation/CBB001251549/)

Article Kim, Hyomin; (2014)
Reconstructing the Public in Old and New Governance: A Korean Case of Nuclear Energy Policy (/isis/citation/CBB001420062/)

Thesis Christopher W. Howell; (2021)
Designer Science: A History of Intelligent Design in America (/isis/citation/CBB325390187/)

Book Robbie Duschinsky; Sarah Foster; (2021)
Mentalizing and Epistemic Trust: The Work of Peter Fonagy and Colleagues at the Anna Freud Centre (/isis/citation/CBB976066181/)

Article Durant, Darrin; (October 2011)
Models of democracy in social studies of science (/isis/citation/CBB562394056/)

Article Monamie Bhadra Haines; (February 2019)
Contested credibility economies of nuclear power in India (/isis/citation/CBB710438620/)

Article Philip R. Egert; Barbara L. Allen; (2019)
Knowledge Justice: An Opportunity for Counter-expertise in Security vs. Science Debates (/isis/citation/CBB135681924/)

Article Giampietro Gobo; Barbara Sena; (2022)
Questioning and Disputing Vaccination Policies. Scientists and Experts in the Italian Public Debate (/isis/citation/CBB026130989/)

Article Emmanuel Henry; Valentin Thomas; Sara Angeli Aguiton; Marc-Olivier Déplaude; Nathalie Jas; (September 2021)
Introduction: Beyond the Production of Ignorance: The Pervasiveness of Industry Influence through the Tools of Chemical Regulation (/isis/citation/CBB736985993/)

Article Peat Leith; Frank Vanclay; (November 2015)
Translating Science to Benefit Diverse Publics: Engagement Pathways for Linking Climate Risk, Uncertainty, and Agricultural Identities (/isis/citation/CBB370881735/)

Article Erica Morrell; (2019)
Localizing Detroit’s Food System: Boundary-Work and the Politics of Experiential Expertise (/isis/citation/CBB914224614/)

Comments

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}