As biomedical research with volunteers was expanded in the United States, the rule of subject selection, constituting scientific and ethical criteria, was generated in 1981 to resolve selection bias in research. Few historical studies, however, have investigated the role of this new hybrid rule in institutional review systems. This paper describes how bioethics commissions and federal agencies have created the subject selection rule based on the concept of justice. I argue that the standardization of this rule as temporal measures, linked with risk-benefit assessment, has reformed the review mechanism, specifically investigators' modification of research plans, thereby developing justice as balancing.
...More
Article
Franklin G. Miller;
(2020)
Revisiting the Distinction and the Connection Between Research and Practice
(/isis/citation/CBB749659220/)
Article
Simon Lohse;
(2021)
Scientific inertia in animal-based research in biomedicine
(/isis/citation/CBB124857110/)
Article
Sarah Babb;
(2021)
The Privatization of Human Research Ethics: An American Story
(/isis/citation/CBB733380502/)
Article
Søren Holm;
(2020)
Belmont in Europe: A Mostly Indirect Influence
(/isis/citation/CBB647472223/)
Article
Andrew Bickford;
(2018)
From Idiophylaxis to Inner Armor: Imagining the Self-Armoring Soldier in the United States Military from the 1960s to Today
(/isis/citation/CBB920652229/)
Article
Franklin G. Miller;
Jonathan Kimmelman;
(2020)
Introduction to the Special Issue on the Belmont Report
(/isis/citation/CBB685361978/)
Thesis
M. Sadegh Foghani;
(2018)
Ayatollahs and Embryos: Science, Politics, and Religion in Post-Revolutionary Iran
(/isis/citation/CBB063043602/)
Article
Tom L. Beauchamp;
(2020)
The Origins and Drafting of the Belmont Report
(/isis/citation/CBB975056514/)
Article
Tomáš Strémy;
Gustáv Dianiška;
Ondrej Hamuľák;
Lukáš Turay;
(2019)
Contributions of Slovak Criminology to the Development of Restorative Justice
(/isis/citation/CBB207441017/)
Article
Magaly Tornay;
(2021)
The Missing Committees: Research Ethics in the Making in Switzerland
(/isis/citation/CBB288164362/)
Article
Matthis Krischel;
(2021)
The Institutionalization of Research Ethics Committees in Germany – International Integration or in the Shadow of Nuremberg?
(/isis/citation/CBB523445668/)
Article
Mical Raz;
(2018)
Psychiatrists and the Transformation of Juvenile Justice in Philadelphia, 1965–1972
(/isis/citation/CBB331684615/)
Article
Helena Tinnerholm Ljungberg;
(2021)
Regulating Research: The Origins and Institutionalization of Research Ethics Committees in Sweden
(/isis/citation/CBB714565276/)
Article
Strasser, Bruno J.;
(2011)
The Experimenter's Museum: GenBank, Natural History, and the Moral Economies of Biomedicine
(/isis/citation/CBB001022861/)
Article
Jonathan Kimmelman;
(2020)
What Is Human Research For? Reflections on the Omission of Scientific Integrity from the Belmont Report
(/isis/citation/CBB296965841/)
Article
Noortje Jacobs;
Helena Tinnerholm Ljungberg;
(2021)
How Ethics Travels: The International Development of Research Ethics Committees in the Late Twentieth Century
(/isis/citation/CBB244060560/)
Article
Noortje Jacobs;
(2021)
“An Official Conscience and Warranting Agency”: Institutional Isomorphism and the Rise of Dutch Ethics Review in the 1970s and 1980s
(/isis/citation/CBB125423159/)
Article
Stephen M. Davies;
(2019)
Rothschild Reversed: Explaining the Exceptionalism of Biomedical Research, 1971–1981
(/isis/citation/CBB964513170/)
Article
Norman K. Swazo;
(2021)
“Un-Promethean” science and the future of humanity: Heidegger’s warning
(/isis/citation/CBB701489985/)
Article
Ong, Aihwa;
(2013)
A Milieu of Mutations: The Pluripotency and Fungibility of Life in Asia
(/isis/citation/CBB001253168/)
Be the first to comment!