Article ID: CBB412625723

Development of the Hybrid Rule and the Concept of Justice: The Selection of Subjects in Biomedical Research (2019)

unapi

As biomedical research with volunteers was expanded in the United States, the rule of subject selection, constituting scientific and ethical criteria, was generated in 1981 to resolve selection bias in research. Few historical studies, however, have investigated the role of this new hybrid rule in institutional review systems. This paper describes how bioethics commissions and federal agencies have created the subject selection rule based on the concept of justice. I argue that the standardization of this rule as temporal measures, linked with risk-benefit assessment, has reformed the review mechanism, specifically investigators' modification of research plans, thereby developing justice as balancing.

...More
Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB412625723/

Similar Citations

Article Franklin G. Miller; (2020)
Revisiting the Distinction and the Connection Between Research and Practice (/isis/citation/CBB749659220/)

Article Simon Lohse; (2021)
Scientific inertia in animal-based research in biomedicine (/isis/citation/CBB124857110/)

Article Sarah Babb; (2021)
The Privatization of Human Research Ethics: An American Story (/isis/citation/CBB733380502/)

Article Søren Holm; (2020)
Belmont in Europe: A Mostly Indirect Influence (/isis/citation/CBB647472223/)

Article Franklin G. Miller; Jonathan Kimmelman; (2020)
Introduction to the Special Issue on the Belmont Report (/isis/citation/CBB685361978/)

Thesis M. Sadegh Foghani; (2018)
Ayatollahs and Embryos: Science, Politics, and Religion in Post-Revolutionary Iran (/isis/citation/CBB063043602/)

Article Tom L. Beauchamp; (2020)
The Origins and Drafting of the Belmont Report (/isis/citation/CBB975056514/)

Article Tomáš Strémy; Gustáv Dianiška; Ondrej Hamuľák; Lukáš Turay; (2019)
Contributions of Slovak Criminology to the Development of Restorative Justice (/isis/citation/CBB207441017/)

Article Magaly Tornay; (2021)
The Missing Committees: Research Ethics in the Making in Switzerland (/isis/citation/CBB288164362/)

Article Helena Tinnerholm Ljungberg; (2021)
Regulating Research: The Origins and Institutionalization of Research Ethics Committees in Sweden (/isis/citation/CBB714565276/)

Article Strasser, Bruno J.; (2011)
The Experimenter's Museum: GenBank, Natural History, and the Moral Economies of Biomedicine (/isis/citation/CBB001022861/)

Article Noortje Jacobs; Helena Tinnerholm Ljungberg; (2021)
How Ethics Travels: The International Development of Research Ethics Committees in the Late Twentieth Century (/isis/citation/CBB244060560/)

Article Stephen M. Davies; (2019)
Rothschild Reversed: Explaining the Exceptionalism of Biomedical Research, 1971–1981 (/isis/citation/CBB964513170/)

Article Norman K. Swazo; (2021)
“Un-Promethean” science and the future of humanity: Heidegger’s warning (/isis/citation/CBB701489985/)

Article Ong, Aihwa; (2013)
A Milieu of Mutations: The Pluripotency and Fungibility of Life in Asia (/isis/citation/CBB001253168/)

Authors & Contributors
Tinnerholm Ljungberg, Helena
Kimmelman, Jonathan
Jacobs, Noortje
Miller, Franklin G.
Strémy, Tomáš
Bickford, Andrew
Concepts
Biology and ethics; bioethics
Biomedicine
Research methods
Science and society
Medicine and ethics
Belmont Report (Bioethics)
Time Periods
20th century, late
21st century
Places
United States
Europe
Philadelphia, PA
Singapore
West Germany
Czechoslovakia
Institutions
Medical Research Council (Great Britain)
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment