In this paper I ague against John Henry's claim that Newton embraced unmediated action at a distance as an explanation of gravity (Henry, 1994, 1999, 2011, 2014). In particular, I take issue with his apparent suggestion that the fact, as he sees it, that two of Newton's prominent followers, namely, Richard Bentley and Samuel Clarke, embraced unmediated action at a distance as an explanation of gravity provides significant supporting evidence that Newton did as well (see Henry, 1994 and 1999). Instead, I argue that while Bentley did ultimately defend the notion of unmediated action at a distance as an explanation of gravity, Newton himself accepted that notion neither in his correspondence with Bentley, as Henry has maintained, nor in any of his later works. I also provide evidence that suggests that Newton did, in fact, accept both the principle of local causation and the passivity of matter. Finally, I argue that whatever the case may be with respect to Newton on the matter, it is clear from his correspondence with Leibniz, as well as from his Boyle lectures, that contrary to what Henry has maintained, Clarke was a stalwart opponent of unmediated action at a distance due to his strong commitment to both the principle of local causation and the passivity of matter.
...More
Article
Ducheyne, Steffen;
(2011)
Newton on Action at a Distance and the Cause of Gravity
(/isis/citation/CBB001024151/)
Article
Schliesser, Eric;
(2013)
On Reading Newton as an Epicurean: Kant, Spinozism and the Changes to the Principia
(/isis/citation/CBB001320265/)
Article
Hayashi, Shin-ichiro;
(2009)
Was Clarke Newton's Agent? Reexamination of Samuel Clarke in the Controversy with Leibniz
(/isis/citation/CBB000931599/)
Book
Lefèvre, Wolfgang;
(2001)
Between Leibniz, Newton, and Kant: Philosophy and Science in the Eighteenth Century
(/isis/citation/CBB000100782/)
Article
Hoskin, Michael;
(2008)
Gravity and Light in the Newtonian Universe of Stars
(/isis/citation/CBB000930128/)
Article
Dyck, Maarten Van;
Verelst, Karin;
(2013)
“Whatever Is Neither Everywhere Nor Anywhere Does Not Exist”: The Concepts of Space and Time in Newton and Leibniz
(/isis/citation/CBB001320861/)
Book
Janiak, Andrew;
Schliesser, Erick;
(2012)
Interpreting Newton: Critical Essays
(/isis/citation/CBB001500334/)
Article
Belkind, Ori;
(2013)
Leibniz and Newton on Space
(/isis/citation/CBB001320865/)
Article
John Henry;
(2020)
Primary and Secondary Causation in Samuel Clarke’s and Isaac Newton’s Theories of Gravity
(/isis/citation/CBB866910656/)
Article
John Henry;
(2023)
Newton's ‘De Aere et Aethere’ and the introduction of interparticulate forces into his physics
(/isis/citation/CBB856534771/)
Article
Schliesser, Eric;
(2011)
Newton's Substance Monism, Distant Action, and the Nature of Newton's Empiricism: Discussion of H. Kochiras “Gravity and Newton's Substance Counting Problem”
(/isis/citation/CBB001024152/)
Book
Zvi Biener;
(2014)
Newton and Empiricism
(/isis/citation/CBB854623933/)
Chapter
Garber, Daniel;
(2012)
Leibniz, Newton and Force
(/isis/citation/CBB001500339/)
Chapter
Schüller, Volkmar;
(2001)
Samuel Clarke's Annotations in Jacques Rohault's Traité de Physique, and How They Contributed to Popularising Newton's Physics
(/isis/citation/CBB000101962/)
Article
Stephen Howard;
(2017)
Why Did Leibniz Fail to Complete His Dynamics?
(/isis/citation/CBB448929987/)
Article
Arthur, Richard T. W.;
(2013)
Leibniz's Theory of Space
(/isis/citation/CBB001320866/)
Chapter
Bouquiaux, Laurence;
(2008)
Leibniz against the Unreasonable Newtonian Physics
(/isis/citation/CBB001023820/)
Chapter
Huggett, Nick;
(2012)
What Did Newton Mean by “Absolute Motion”?
(/isis/citation/CBB001500345/)
Essay Review
Demeter, Tamás;
(2014)
Newton for Philosophers
(/isis/citation/CBB001500335/)
Book
Beeley, Philip;
Scriba, Christoph J.;
(2012)
Correspondence of John Wallis (1616--1703). Vol. III, October 1668--December 1673
(/isis/citation/CBB001200116/)
Be the first to comment!