From “Experiments of Concern” to “Groups of Concern”: Constructing and Containing Citizens in Synthetic Biology (2020)
Synthetic biology represents a recent and explicit attempt to make biology easier to engineer, and through this to open up the design space of genetic engineering to a wider range of practitioners (including, but not limited to, engineers). Proponents of this approach emphasize the standardization of practices as key to successful biological engineering; yet, meaningful transatlantic differences are emerging with respect to the constitution of key concerns and the governance of synthetic biology in the United States (US) and the United Kingdom (UK). In this article, I tease out how national approaches to governing synthetic biology are being framed against different salient past experiences with recombinant DNA technology. In the US, the governance of synthetic biology is consistently articulated in relation to the early days of recombinant DNA technology and the self-governance mechanisms pioneered in response to Asilomar. In the UK, more recent experiences with genetically modified crops provide the overarching imaginary against which governance initiatives are being proposed. I suggest that these differing sociotechnical imaginaries have implications for how new “groups of concern” are being defined in relation to synthetic biology and how measures to contain perceived risks are being pursued in the US and Britain.
...MoreArticle J. Benjamin Hurlbut; Sheila Jasanoff; Krishanu Saha (2020) Constitutionalism at the Nexus of Life and Law. Science, Technology, and Human Values (pp. 979-1000).
Similar Citations
Article
Amy Hinterberger;
(2020)
Regulating Estrangement: Human–Animal Chimeras in Postgenomic Biology
Article
J. Benjamin Hurlbut;
Ingrid Metzler;
Luca Marelli;
Sheila Jasanoff;
(2020)
Bioconstitutional Imaginaries and the Comparative Politics of Genetic Self-knowledge
Article
Sheila Jasanoff;
Ingrid Metzler;
(2020)
Borderlands of Life: IVF Embryos and the Law in the United States, United Kingdom, and Germany
Article
Claire Marris;
Jane Calvert;
(2020)
Science and Technology Studies in Policy: The UK Synthetic Biology Roadmap
Article
Alexandra Palmer;
Reuben Message;
Beth Greenhough;
(2021)
Edge cases in animal research law: Constituting the regulatory borderlands of the UK's Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act
Article
Emanuele Armocida;
Francesco Galassi;
(2019)
Charles Stent (1807–1885) between Innovation and Business: A Dentist’s Role in the History of Dentistry and Surgery
Article
Shira Shmuely;
(2024)
“Sentient Beings”: Cephalopods’ Minds and U.K. Law
Chapter
Federico Roggero;
(2020)
Leggi per gestire una Grande Guerra. Tra Italia ed Inghilterra
Article
Nick Clarke;
Clive Barnett;
(2023)
Archiving the COVID-19 pandemic in Mass Observation and Middletown
Article
Christopher D. Kilgore;
(2016)
Bad Networks: From Virus to Cancer in Post-Cyberpunk Narrative
Article
Gail Davies;
(2021)
Locating the ‘culture wars’ in laboratory animal research: National constitutions and global competition
Book
Carl-Henry Geschwind;
(2017)
A Comparative History of Motor Fuels Taxation, 1909-2009: Why Gasoline Is Cheap and Petrol Is Dear
Article
Rajani Sudan;
Will Tattersdill;
(2018)
State of the Unions Redux
Book
Rachel K. Gibson;
(2020)
When the Nerds Go Marching In: How Digital Technology Moved from the Margins to the Mainstream of Political Campaigns
Book
Johan Alfredo Linthorst;
(2023)
Research between Science, Society and Politics: The History and Scientific Development of Green Chemistry
Book
Rachel Elder;
Thomas Schlich;
(2025)
Technology, health, and the patient consumer in the twentieth century
Article
Pierre-Olivier Méthot;
(2014)
Science and Science Policy: Regulating “Select Agents” in the Age of Synthetic Biology
Article
McHugh, Susan;
(2010)
Real Artificial: Tissue-cultured Meat, Genetically Modified Farm Animals, and Fictions
Book
Helen Anne Curry;
(2016)
Evolution Made to Order: Plant Breeding and Technological Innovation in Twentieth-Century America
Article
M'charek, Amade;
Hagendijk, Rob;
Vries, Wiebe de;
(2013)
Equal before the Law: On the Machinery of Sameness in Forensic DNA Practice
Be the first to comment!