In the late 19th century, the questionnaire was one means of taking the case study into the multitudes. This article engages with Forrester’s idea of thinking in cases as a means of interrogating questionnaire-based research in early American psychology. Questionnaire research was explicitly framed by psychologists as a practice involving both natural historical and statistical forms of scientific reasoning. At the same time, questionnaire projects failed to successfully enact the latter aspiration in terms of synthesizing masses of collected data into a coherent whole. Difficulties in managing the scores of descriptive information questionnaires generated ensured the continuing presence of individuals in the results of this research, as the individual case was excerpted and discussed alongside a cast of others. As a consequence, questionnaire research embodied an amalgam of case, natural historical, and statistical thinking. Ultimately, large-scale data collection undertaken with questionnaires failed in its aim to construct composite exemplars or ‘types’ of particular kinds of individuals; to produce the singular from the multitudes.
...MoreArticle Chris Millard; Felicity Callard (2020) Thinking in, with, across, and beyond cases with John Forrester. History of the Human Sciences (pp. 3-14).
Article
Jessica Pykett;
Mark Paterson;
(2022)
Stressing the ‘body electric’: History and psychology of the techno-ecologies of work stress
(/isis/citation/CBB933468112/)
Article
Waller, G. N. H.;
(2014)
A Review of Nineteenth-Century Records of Sowerby's Beaked Whale (Mesoplodon bidens)
(/isis/citation/CBB001202225/)
Article
Flavia Marcacci;
(2018)
La scienza e l’ipotesi assoluta. Metodologia e logica della ricerca nell’Almagestum novum di Giovanni Battista Riccioli
(/isis/citation/CBB197851371/)
Article
Melinda Baldwin;
(2018)
A Perspective from the History of Scientific Journals
(/isis/citation/CBB030888393/)
Article
Theodore M. Porter;
(2018)
Digital Humanism
(/isis/citation/CBB751955814/)
Article
Ivan Flis;
(2018)
Digital Humanities as the Historian’s Trojan Horse: Response to Commentary in the Special Section on Digital History
(/isis/citation/CBB638759086/)
Article
Zelle, Carsten;
(2013)
Empiricism and the “Reasonable Physicians” of the Early Enlightenment
(/isis/citation/CBB001213585/)
Article
Steven Ruggles;
Diana L Magnuson;
(2020)
Census Technology, Politics, and Institutional Change, 1790–2020
(/isis/citation/CBB460583621/)
Article
Xiaochang Li;
(2023)
“There’s No Data Like More Data”: Automatic Speech Recognition and the Making of Algorithmic Culture
(/isis/citation/CBB996020233/)
Article
David Sepkoski;
(2017)
The Database before the Computer?
(/isis/citation/CBB586818085/)
Book
Daniel Kreiss;
(2016)
Prototype politics: Technology-intensive campaigning and the data of democracy
(/isis/citation/CBB572327913/)
Article
Christine von Oertzen;
(2017)
Machineries of Data Power: Manual versus Mechanical Census Compilation in Nineteenth-Century Europe
(/isis/citation/CBB931072335/)
Article
Kim M. Hajek;
(2020)
Periodical Amnesia and Dédoublement in Case-Reasoning: Writing Psychological Cases in Late 19th-Century France
(/isis/citation/CBB193345504/)
Article
Green, Christopher D.;
Feinerer, Ingo;
Burman, Jeremy T.;
(2014)
Beyond the Schools of Psychology 2: A Digital Analysis of Psychological Review, 1904--1923
(/isis/citation/CBB001420018/)
Article
Jemma Lorenat;
(2022)
An Okapi Hypothesis: Non-Euclidean Geometry and the Professional Expert in American Mathematics
(/isis/citation/CBB066890396/)
Article
Dan Bouk;
(2017)
The History and Political Economy of Personal Data over the Last Two Centuries in Three Acts
(/isis/citation/CBB789951727/)
Book
Schulten, Susan;
(2012)
Mapping the Nation: History and Cartography in Nineteenth-Century America
(/isis/citation/CBB001201279/)
Article
David Armstrong;
(February 2019)
The social life of data points: Antecedents of digital technologies
(/isis/citation/CBB757557196/)
Thesis
Zachary Joseph Levine;
(2021)
The Illuminating Case: The Case Study Method in the Fin-De-siècle French Brain and Mind Sciences
(/isis/citation/CBB860383710/)
Article
Fridolin Gross;
Nina Kranke;
Robert Meunier;
(2019)
Pluralization Through Epistemic Competition: Scientific Change in Times of Data-Intensive Biology
(/isis/citation/CBB374064986/)
Be the first to comment!