Endersby, Jim (Author)
British Journal for the History of Science
Volume: 49
Issue: 2
Pages: 205-229
Between 1916 and 1927, botanists in several countries independently resolved three problems that had mystified earlier naturalists – including Charles Darwin: how did the many species of orchid that did not produce nectar persuade insects to pollinate them? Why did some orchid flowers seem to mimic insects? And why should a native British orchid suffer ‘attacks’ from a bee? Half a century after Darwin's death, these three mysteries were shown to be aspects of a phenomenon now known as pseudocopulation, whereby male insects are deceived into attempting to mate with the orchid's flowers, which mimic female insects; the males then carry the flower's pollen with them when they move on to try the next deceptive orchid. Early twentieth-century botanists were able to see what their predecessors had not because orchids (along with other plants) had undergone an imaginative re-creation: Darwin's science was appropriated by popular interpreters of science, including the novelist Grant Allen; then H.G. Wells imagined orchids as killers (inspiring a number of imitators), to produce a genre of orchid stories that reflected significant cultural shifts, not least in the presentation of female sexuality. It was only after these changes that scientists were able to see plants as equipped with agency, actively able to pursue their own, cunning reproductive strategies – and to outwit animals in the process. This paper traces the movement of a set of ideas that were created in a context that was recognizably scientific; they then became popular non-fiction, then popular fiction, and then inspired a new science, which in turn inspired a new generation of fiction writers. Long after clear barriers between elite and popular science had supposedly been established in the early twentieth century, they remained porous because a variety of imaginative writers kept destabilizing them. The fluidity of the boundaries between makers, interpreters and publics of scientific knowledge was a highly productive one; it helped biology become a vital part of public culture in the twentieth century and beyond.
...MoreReview Amy M. King (2018) Review of "Deceived by Orchids: Sex, Science, Fiction and Darwin". Journal of Literature and Science (pp. 124-125).
Similar Citations
Book
Cheng, John;
(2012)
Astounding Wonder: Imagining Science and Science Fiction in Interwar America
(/isis/citation/CBB001202122/)
Book
Page, Michael R.;
(2012)
The Literary Imagination from Erasmus Darwin to H.G. Wells: Science, Evolution, and Ecology
(/isis/citation/CBB001320100/)
Chapter
Carlo Paghetti;
(2014)
I scientific romances di H.G. Wells: variazioni sul tema dello scienziato darwiniano
(/isis/citation/CBB786747471/)
Chapter
Jones, Steve;
(2010)
The Evolution of Utopia
(/isis/citation/CBB001023134/)
Article
Stiles, Anne;
(2009)
Literature in Mind: H. G. Wells and the Evolution of the Mad Scientist
(/isis/citation/CBB001030597/)
Book
Henry, Holly;
(2003)
Virginia Woolf and the Discourse of Science: The Aesthetics of Astronomy
(/isis/citation/CBB000470393/)
Book
McLean, Steven;
(2009)
The Early Fiction of H. G. Wells: Fantasies of Science
(/isis/citation/CBB000952806/)
Book
Dawson, Gowan;
(2007)
Darwin, Literature and Victorian Respectability
(/isis/citation/CBB000774026/)
Book
Kandel, Eric R;
(2012)
The Age of Insight: The Quest to Understand the Unconscious in Art, Mind, and Brain, from Vienna 1900 to the Present
(/isis/citation/CBB001201847/)
Article
Schwartz, Matthias;
(2013)
How Nauchnaia Fantastika Was Made: The Debates about the Genre of Science Fiction from NEP to High Stalinism
(/isis/citation/CBB001201410/)
Book
Greenslade, William;
Rodgers, Terence;
(2005)
Grant Allen: Literature and Cultural Politics at the Fin de Siècle
(/isis/citation/CBB000501537/)
Book
F. James;
R. Bud;
M. Shiach;
P. Greenhalgh;
(2018)
Being Modern: The Cultural Impact of Science in the Early Twentieth Century
(/isis/citation/CBB441532378/)
Article
Maguire, Muireann;
(2013)
Aleksei N. Tolstoi and the Enigmatic Engineer: A Case of Vicarious Revisionism
(/isis/citation/CBB001201409/)
Thesis
Stiles, Anne Meredith;
(2006)
Neurological Fictions: Brain Science and Literary History, 1865--1905
(/isis/citation/CBB001560560/)
Book
Will Tattersdill;
(2016)
Science, Fiction, and the Fin-de-Siècle Periodical Press
(/isis/citation/CBB727795187/)
Thesis
Choo, Jae-uk;
(2014)
Uneasy Hybridity: The Nature and Culture of Science, and Its Bioethical Implications in Select Victorian Fiction
(/isis/citation/CBB001567656/)
Article
Kreisel, Deanna K.;
(2014)
The Discreet Charm of Abstraction: Hyperspace Worlds and Victorian Geometry
(/isis/citation/CBB001550339/)
Thesis
Farooq, Nihad M.;
(2006)
Sensing Subjects: Ethnographic Modernity from Charles Darwin to Richard Wright
(/isis/citation/CBB001561530/)
Chapter
Markley, Robert;
(2008)
The Nightmare of Evolution: H. G. Wells, Percival Lowell and the Legacies of Frankenstein's Science
(/isis/citation/CBB000760400/)
Thesis
Walsh, Erin Aileen;
(2010)
Analogy's Territories: Ethics and Aesthetics in Darwinism, Modernism, and Cybernetics
(/isis/citation/CBB001560639/)
Be the first to comment!