In this article, I examine the rhetoric of democratic science within the field of synthetic biology. The still emerging field of synthetic biology claims to be a new kind of science based on the promises of affordable medicines, environmental bioremediation, and democratic, do-it-yourself (DIY) science practices. I argue that the formation of a more democratic, DIY portion of this field represents an intervention into ethics debates by becoming “the proper informed public.” Through an analysis of twelve DIY and community-based synthetic biology organizations’ websites, I found that democratic science was presented as a novel, progressive approach to science that addresses ethical concerns and at the same time produces better scientific results. In part, these claims were made possible through a reconfiguring of the boundaries between Science and the Public where scientists lay claim to solidarity with the public at large in opposition to traditional biosciences and Big Bio. My research suggests that the superficial use of the language of rights and democracy relegitimizes the primacy of scientific discovery to solve societal problems. I further suggest that by becoming the proper informed public, ethical challenges from publics critical of genetic sciences may become delegitimized.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Roderic N. Crooks;
(2019)
Times Thirty: Access, Maintenance, and Justice
Article
Ruha Benjamin;
(November 2016)
Informed Refusal: Toward a Justice-based Bioethics
Article
Amy Adams Quark;
(2019)
Outsourcing Regulatory Decision-making: “International” Epistemic Communities, Transnational Firms, and Pesticide Residue Standards in India
Article
Barbara L. Allen;
(November 2018)
Strongly Participatory Science and Knowledge Justice in an Environmentally Contested Region
Article
Joanna Goven;
Vincenzo Pavone;
(May 2015)
The Bioeconomy as Political Project: A Polanyian Analysis
Essay Review
Brian M. Donovan;
(2018)
Looking Backwards to Move Biology Education Toward Its Humanitarian Potential: A Review of Darwinism, Democracy, and Race
Article
Deborah Scott;
(2023)
Diversifying the Deliberative Turn: Toward an Agonistic RRI
Article
Anja Bauer;
Alexander Bogner;
(2020)
Let’s (not) talk about synthetic biology: Framing an emerging technology in public and stakeholder dialogues
Book
Myrna Perez;
(2024)
Criticizing Science: Stephen Jay Gould and the Struggle for American Democracy
Article
Martine Lappé;
Fionna Francis Fahey;
Robbin Jeffries Hein;
(2024)
Epigenomic Stories: Evidence of Harm and the Social Justice Promises and Perils of Environmental Epigenetics
Book
Randall Curren;
Ellen Metzger;
(2017)
Living Well Now and in the Future: Why Sustainability Matters
Essay Review
Esther M. van Dijk;
(2017)
What do We Need to Live Well?
Article
Hauke Riesch;
Photini Vrikki;
Neil Stephens;
Jamie Lewis;
Olwenn Martin;
(2021)
'A Moment of Science, Please': Activism, Community, and Humor at the March for Science
Article
Hannah Landecker;
(2016)
It is what it eats: Chemically defined media and the history of surrounds
Article
Rahul Mukherjee;
(September 2016)
Toxic Lunch in Bhopal and Chemical Publics
Book
Joanne Barker;
(2021)
Red Scare: The State's Indigenous Terrorist
Book
Nicole Fabricant;
(2022)
Fighting to Breathe: Race, Toxicity, and the Rise of Youth Activism in Baltimore
Book
Karel Martens;
(2017)
Transport Justice: Designing fair transportation systems
Book
Nancy Cook;
Butz, David Aaron;
(2019)
Mobilities, mobility justice and social justice
Book
Leah N. Gordon;
(2015)
From Power to Prejudice: The Rise of Racial Individualism in Midcentury America
Be the first to comment!