The increasingly global scope of biomedical research and testing using animals is generating disagreement over the best way to regulate laboratory animal science and care. Despite many common aims, the practices through which political and epistemic authority are allocated in the regulations around animal research varies internationally, coming together in what can be identified as different national constitutions. Tensions between these periodically erupt within the laboratory animal research community as a ‘cultural war’ between those favouring centralised control and those advocating local flexibility. Drawing on long-term engagement with key events and actors in these policy debates, I propose these national differences in the constitution of animal research can be understood through the intersection of two key variables: i) the location of institutional responsibility to permit research projects and ii) the distribution of epistemic authority to shape research practices. These variables are used to explain the development of different policy frameworks in the UK, Europe, and the USA, and identify where there is convergence and divergence in practice. Concluding, I suggest the way these approaches are combined and enacted in different countries reflects different national civic epistemologies, which are coming into conflict in the increasingly global networks of laboratory animal science.
...More
Article
Simon Lohse;
(2021)
Scientific inertia in animal-based research in biomedicine
(/isis/citation/CBB124857110/)
Article
Per-Anders Svärd;
Helena Tinnerholm Ljungberg;
(2021)
Fetal and animal research in Sweden: The construction of viable lives in regulatory policy debates, 1970–1980
(/isis/citation/CBB965696186/)
Article
Rebecca A. Hardesty;
(2018)
Much ado about mice: Standard-setting in model organism research
(/isis/citation/CBB487976291/)
Article
Brad Bolman;
(2022)
Dogs for Life: Beagles, Drugs, and Capital in the Twentieth Century
(/isis/citation/CBB399574473/)
Article
Tarquin Holmes;
(2017)
The wild type as concept and in experimental practice: A history of its role in classical genetics and evolutionary theory
(/isis/citation/CBB016897194/)
Article
Karen A. Rader;
(2022)
Reflections on Making Mice (2004)
(/isis/citation/CBB321873815/)
Article
Brad Bolman;
(2021)
Pig Mentations: Race and Face in Radiobiology
(/isis/citation/CBB398870305/)
Book
Johan Alfredo Linthorst;
(2023)
Research between Science, Society and Politics: The History and Scientific Development of Green Chemistry
(/isis/citation/CBB404777221/)
Article
Hannah Landecker;
(2016)
It is what it eats: Chemically defined media and the history of surrounds
(/isis/citation/CBB598422047/)
Article
Angela N. H. Creager;
(2022)
Model Organisms Unbound
(/isis/citation/CBB532396920/)
Article
Colleen Lanier-Christensen;
(September 2021)
Creating Regulatory Harmony: The Participatory Politics of OECD Chemical Testing Standards in the Making
(/isis/citation/CBB606231580/)
Article
Christine Hauskeller;
Nicole Baur;
Jean Harrington;
(2019)
Standards, Harmonization and Cultural Differences: Examining the Implementation of a European Stem Cell Clinical Trial
(/isis/citation/CBB953736485/)
Article
Lene Koch;
Mette N. Svendsen;
(May 2015)
Negotiating Moral Value: A Story of Danish Research Monkeys and Their Humans
(/isis/citation/CBB281898023/)
Article
Brad Bolman;
(2022)
Introduction: What Right? Which Organisms? Why Jobs?
(/isis/citation/CBB702630053/)
Article
David J. Gerber;
(Winter 2019)
Prisms of Distance and Power: Viewing the U.S. Regulatory Tradition
(/isis/citation/CBB183281762/)
Article
Robert G. W. Kirk;
Edmund Ramsden;
(2021)
"Havens of mercy”: health, medical research, and the governance of the movement of dogs in twentieth-century America
(/isis/citation/CBB713465624/)
Book
Rachel K. Gibson;
(2020)
When the Nerds Go Marching In: How Digital Technology Moved from the Margins to the Mainstream of Political Campaigns
(/isis/citation/CBB385530642/)
Article
John Lantos;
(2016)
Henry K. Beecher and the Oversight of Research in Children
(/isis/citation/CBB814482608/)
Article
David Demortain;
(2024)
How scientists become experts—or don’t: Social organization of research and engagement in scientific advice in a toxicology laboratory
(/isis/citation/CBB039693533/)
Book
Stephanie Elizabeth Mohr;
(2018)
First in Fly: Drosophila Research and Biological Discovery
(/isis/citation/CBB668155327/)
Be the first to comment!