One claim found in the received historiography of the biometrical school (comprised primarily of Francis Galton, Karl Pearson, and W. F. R. Weldon) is that one of the biometricians' great flaws was their inability to look past their population-focused, statistical, gradualist understanding of evolutionary change – which led, in part, to their ignoring developments in cellular biology around 1900. I will argue, on the contrary, that the work of the biometricians was, from its earliest days, fundamentally concerned with connections between statistical patterns of inheritance and the underlying cellular features that gave rise to them. Such work remained current with contemporary knowledge of chromosomes, cytology, and development; in this article, I explore the first case. The biometricians were thus well positioned to understand the relationship between the patterns of Mendelian inheritance and the statistical distributions with which they primarily occupied themselves. Ignorance of this connection, then, is not the reason why they rejected Mendelism. Further, both Galton and Weldon – though each in their own unique way – decided to turn to biological detail as a way to better justify the generality of their statistical approaches to heredity. Perhaps paradoxically, then, for these biometricians, detail offered an approach to theoretical generality.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Nicholas W. Gillham;
(2015)
The Battle Between the Biometricians and the Mendelians: How Sir Francis Galton’s Work Caused his Disciples to Reach Conflicting Conclusions About the Hereditary Mechanism
Article
Pence, Charles H.;
(2011)
“Describing Our Whole Experience”: The Statistical Philosophies of W. F. R. Weldon and Karl Pearson
Article
Radick, Gregory;
(2011)
Physics in the Galtonian Sciences of Heredity
Article
Rushton, A. R.;
(2000)
Nettleship, Pearson and Bateson: The biometric-Mendelian debate in a medical context
Article
Porter, Theodore M.;
(2014)
The Curious Case of Blending Inheritance
Article
Charles H. Pence;
(2015)
The Early History of Chance in Evolution
Article
Magnello, M. Eileen;
(2009)
Karl Pearson and the Establishment of Mathematical Statistics
Article
Roll-Hansen, Nils;
(2009)
Sources of Wilhelm Johannsen's Genotype Theory
Book
Rushton, Alan R.;
(2009)
Genetics in Medicine in Great Britain 1600 to 1939
Article
Edwards, A. W. F.;
(2012)
Punnett's Square
Article
Nicola Bertoldi;
(2022)
“Batesonian Mendelism” and “Pearsonian biometry”: Shedding new light on the controversy between William Bateson and Karl Pearson
Article
Morrison, Margaret;
(2002)
Modelling Populations: Pearson and Fisher on Mendelism and Biometry
Book
Bulmer, Michael G.;
(2003)
Francis Galton: Pioneer of Heredity and Biometry
Book
Gregory Radick;
(2023)
Disputed Inheritance: The Battle over Mendel and the Future of Biology
Article
Pritchard, Chris;
(2008)
Mistakes Concerning a Chance Encounter between Francis Galton and John Venn
Chapter
Gayon, Jean;
(2007)
Karl Pearson ou les enjeux du phénoménalisme dans les sciences biologiques vers 1900
Article
Yafeng Shan;
(2021)
Beyond Mendelism and Biometry
Article
Magnello, M. Eileen;
(1996)
Karl Pearson's Gresham lectures: W.F.R. Weldon, speciation, and the origins of Pearsonian statistics
Thesis
Pence, Charles H.;
(2014)
Chance in Evolutionary Theory: Fitness, Selection, and Genetic Drift in Philosophical and Historical Perspective
Article
Roger J. Wood;
(2015)
Darbishire expands his vision of heredity from Mendelian genetics to inherited memory
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
British Journal for the History of Science
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
British Society for the History of Mathematics Bulletin
History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences
Be the first to comment!