Article ID: CBB366782410

The Bayesian approach to forensic evidence: Evaluating, communicating, and distributing responsibility (October 2013)

unapi

This article draws attention to communication across professions as an important aspect of forensic evidence. Based on ethnographic fieldwork in the Swedish legal system, it shows how forensic scientists use a particular quantitative approach to evaluating forensic laboratory results, the Bayesian approach, as a means of quantifying uncertainty and communicating it accurately to judges, prosecutors, and defense lawyers, as well as a means of distributing responsibility between the laboratory and the court. This article argues that using the Bayesian approach also brings about a particular type of intersubjectivity; in order to make different types of forensic evidence commensurable and combinable, quantifications must be consistent across forensic specializations, which brings about a transparency based on shared understandings and practices. Forensic scientists strive to keep the black box of forensic evidence – at least partly – open in order to achieve this transparency.

...More
Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB366782410/

Similar Citations

Article Nadine Levin; Sabina Leonelli; (March 2017)
How Does One “Open” Science? Questions of Value in Biological Research (/isis/citation/CBB290502459/)

Article Julia Alejandra Morales-Fontanilla; Santiago Martínez-Medina; (2019)
Corpo-real ethnographies: Bodies, dissection planes, and cutting. Ethnography from the anatomy laboratory and the public morgues in Colombia (/isis/citation/CBB581409108/)

Article Alison Cool; (August 2019)
Impossible, unknowable, accountable: Dramas and dilemmas of data law (/isis/citation/CBB709306750/)

Article Lambros Roumbanis; (2022)
Disagreement and Agonistic Chance in Peer Review (/isis/citation/CBB437513195/)

Article Cornelius Schubert; Andreas Kolb; (May 2021)
Designing Technology, Developing Theory: Toward a Symmetrical Approach (/isis/citation/CBB107590623/)

Article Robin S. Gregory; (January 2017)
The Troubling Logic of Inclusivity in Environmental Consultations (/isis/citation/CBB229498527/)

Article Sabina Leonelli; Brian Rappert; Gail Davies; (March 2017)
Data Shadows: Knowledge, Openness, and Absence (Special Issue Introduction) (/isis/citation/CBB950275922/)

Article Marko Monteiro; (2018)
Ethnography and interdisciplinary work: Experiences from the US and Brazil (/isis/citation/CBB616934249/)

Article Edwards, Paul N.; Mayernik, Matthew S.; Batcheller, Archer L.; Bowker, Geoffrey C.; Borgman, Christine L.; (October 2011)
Science friction: Data, metadata, and collaboration (/isis/citation/CBB261989499/)

Article Federico Brandmayr; (May 2017)
How Social Scientists Make Causal Claims in Court: Evidence from the L’Aquila Trial (/isis/citation/CBB603433424/)

Article Vivette García Deister; (2023)
Critical contacts: making STS public amid Mexico’s forensic crisis (/isis/citation/CBB673784229/)

Article Erik Børve Rasmussen; (December 2020)
Making and managing medical anomalies: Exploring the classification of ‘medically unexplained symptoms’ (/isis/citation/CBB131501262/)

Article Jorge Castillo-Sepúlveda; Francisco Tirado; Ana Gálvez; (2023)
Biopolitics and speculative objects in Chilean health projects (/isis/citation/CBB679456149/)

Authors & Contributors
Roumbanis, Lambros
Leonelli, Sabina
Cool, Alison
Andreas Kolb
Federico Brandmayr
Comandini, Ana C. Gálvez
Journals
Science, Technology and Human Values
Social Studies of Science
Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society
Publishers
University of Tokyo Press
Concepts
Technoscience; science and technology studies
Ethnography
Forensic sciences
Certainty; uncertainty
Transparency
Interdisciplinary approach to knowledge
Time Periods
21st century
Places
Sweden
Colombia
Papua New Guinea
United States
North America
New Zealand
Institutions
Swedish Research Council
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment