The US Air Force’s and Navy’s semi-autonomous radar- and infrared-guided air-to-air missiles performed miserably in air combat over Vietnam. Despite accusations that the military’s overreliance on complex technology was to blame, the two services continued to invest in ever-more advanced fighter aircraft and high-tech missiles after the war. In 1977 at the behest of Congress, the Air Force and Navy spent almost a full year evaluating air combat tactics and new infrared-guided air-to-air missiles. According to the services’ interpretation of the results from the aimval and aceval tests, future air combat demanded both improved infrared-guided missiles and revolutionary radar-guided missiles. The apparent paradox—testing infrared missiles to justify a more expensive radar-guided missile—was seized on by the military “Reformers” as emblematic of the US military’s unhealthy fascination with exorbitantly priced high-technology. This paper discusses the pivotal AIMVAL-ACEVAL tests, including their laborious design process and execution, and their subsequent role animating the early-1980s public debate over military technology. This understanding is crucial when evaluating the relative significance of organizational inertia in the Air Force’s air-to-air procurement decisions following Vietnam. Additionally, the AIMVAL-ACEVAL tests offer evidence of three pathologies that distinguish military tests from their typical civilian exemplars: military tests cannot be conducted independent of the service(s); the tests are generally inflexible and unreplicable; and their data are usually shrouded by classification concerns. These pathologies make it difficult to reconcile divergent interpretations and resolve controversies that emerge from military testing activities.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Book
David N. Spires;
(2021)
Assured Access: A History of the United States Air Force Space Launch Enterprise, 1945-2020
Book
Michael W. Hankins;
(2021)
Flying Camelot: The F-15, the F-16, and the Weaponization of Fighter Pilot Nostalgia
Book
Sterling Michael Pavelec;
(2010)
The Jet Race and the Second World War
Article
Nilsson, Mikael;
(2008)
The Power of Technology: U.S. Hegemony and the Transfer of Guided Missiles to NATO during the Cold War, 1953–1962
Article
Colin A. Hempstead;
(2008)
Infrared Missiles, Some Young Scientists and a New Technology
Article
Coletta, Damon;
Sacko, David H.;
(2008)
Notes from the Field: Guided missile transfer to Sweden
Thesis
Milobsky, David N.;
(1996)
Leadership and competition: Technological innovation and organization change at the U.S. Department of Defense, 1955-1968
Book
Bill Yenne;
(2018)
The Complete History of U.S. Cruise Missiles: From Kettering's 1920s' Bug & 1950's Snark to Today's Tomahawk
Article
Wildenberg, Thomas;
(2007)
A Visionary Ahead of His Time: Howard Hughes and the U.S. Air Force---Part I: The Air Corps Design Competition
Book
Ken Young;
(2016)
The American Bomb in Britain: U.S. Air Forces’ Strategic Presence, 1946-64
Article
M.C. Elish;
(November 2017)
Remote Split: A History of US Drone Operations and the Distributed Labor of War
Article
Cathcart, Tim;
(October 2018)
If God Is with Us: The Religious Culture of the U.S. Air Force
Book
Peter Westwick;
(2020)
Stealth: The Secret Contest to Invent Invisible Aircraft
Book
(1995)
A history of the Department of Defense federally funded research and development centers
Article
Schwartz, Norton A.;
(2009)
The Air Force's Enduring Legacy of Nuclear Deterrence
Book
Christopher Gainor;
(2018)
The Bomb and America's Missile Age
Book
Peter E. Davies;
(2021)
B/EB-66 Destroyer Units in Combat
Article
Whitcomb, Darrel;
(2011)
Pave Nail: There at the Beginning of the Precision Weapons Revolution
Book
Timothy R. Keck;
Lori Ann Dawson;
(2014)
A Magnificent Showcase: History, Heritage, and Art: the United States Air Force and the Air Force Art Program
Book
Richard H. Graham;
(2016)
SR–71 Flight Manual, The Official Pilot’s Handbook, Declassified and Expanded with Commentary
Be the first to comment!