Loiodice, Eleonora (Author)
The multifaceted, but little-known intellectual, Giorgio de Santillana (1902-1974) devoted most of his studies to the history of science. He wrote with Federigo Enriques the volume Storia del pensiero scientifico: il mondo antico. Afterwards, he moved to the USA and became a professor at MIT, he continued to dedicate his studies to the origins of scientific thought. Indeed, de Santillana and the ethnologist Hertha von Dechend wrote the book Hamlet’s Mill (1969), in which they traced the origin of scientific thought in the various mythologies from the world. Their idea was born from the “deep unease with the dominant way of interpreting and judging traditions that are not expressed in the «language» familiar to us, namely the scientific idiom coined by the Greeks.” In many of the mythologies analysed, there are characters and events that are repeated in an almost similar way, such as the destruction of a mill: this event is read as the first representation of the Precession movement of the Equinoxes. The paper therefore aims to analyse this vision, contextualizing it in the studies of the two authors.
...More
Article
Lindgren, Uta;
(2003)
Eloge: Hertha von Dechend, 1915-2001
Chapter
Francesco Paolo Ceglia (de);
Eleonora Loiodice;
(2024)
Impegno civile, storia e filosofia della scienza in Giorgio Diaz de Santillana
Book
Michele Camerota;
(2024)
Il fantasma di Amleto. Giorgio de Santillana tra Salvemini e Mussolini
Chapter
Arcangelo Rossi;
(2017)
Federigo Enriques between popularization and scientific criticism
Article
Ian Hesketh;
(2016)
Counterfactuals and history: Contingency and convergence in histories of science and life
Article
Crignon, Claire;
Antoine-Mahut, Delphine;
(2014)
Médecine, philosophie et révolution scientifique. Une étude bibliographique
Article
Berkel, Klaas van;
(2013)
Aan de tijd ontstegen: E.J. Dijksterhuis (1892--1965) en De mechanisering van het wereldbeeld
Article
(1976)
Giorgio Diaz De Santillana, 1902-1974. Éloge
Article
Luca Nicotra;
(2023)
The Italian Neo-Idealists and Federigo Enriques: The Dispute Between Benedetto Croce and Federigo Enriques: a Defeat for Enriques?
Book
Michael Friedman;
(2022)
Ramified Surfaces: On Branch Curves and Algebraic Geometry in the 20th Century
Article
Babbitt, Donald;
Goodstein, Judith;
(2011)
Federigo Enriques's Quest to Prove the “Completeness Theorem”
Article
Paolo Bussotti;
(2023)
Parmenides, the Founder of Abstract Geometry: Enriques Interpreter of the Eleatic Thought
Article
Gattinara, Enrico Castelli;
(2011)
Le Rôle Civique du Rationalisme Expérimental Chez Federigo Enriques
Book
Enriques, Federigo;
(1975)
Il razionalismo sperimentale: Antologia a cura di Castellana, Mario
Article
Cerroni, Cinzia;
(2007)
The Contributions of Hilbert and Dehn to Non-Archimedean Geometries and Their Impact on the Italian School
Article
Israel, Giorgio;
Menghini, Marta;
(1998)
The “essential tension” at work in qualitative analysis: A case study of the opposite points of view of Poincaré and Enriques on the relationships between analysis and geometry
Article
Mumford, David;
(2011)
Intuition and Rigor and Enriques's Quest
Book
(1998)
Federigo Enriques: Filosofia e storia del pensiero scientifico
Chapter
Castellana, Mario;
(1991)
Enriques interprete di Riemann: Geometrie e filosofia
Chapter
Marco Toscano;
(2009)
Geometria e fisica: il significato storico-filosofico della relatività di Einstein nel pensiero di Federigo Enriques
Be the first to comment!