Bradley, Clara (Author)
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
Volume: 72
Issue: 4
Pages: 1039-1059
In this article, I give a counterexample to a claim made in (Norton [2008]) that empirically equivalent theories can often be regarded as theoretically equivalent by treating one as having surplus structure, thereby overcoming the problem of underdetermination of theory choice. The case I present is that of Lorentz’s ether theory and Einstein’s theory of special relativity. I argue that Norton’s suggestion that surplus structure is present in Lorentz’s theory in the form of the ether state of rest is based on a misunderstanding of the role that the ether plays in Lorentz’s theory, and that in general, consideration of the conceptual framework in which a theory is embedded is vital to understanding the relationship between different theories.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Janssen, Michel;
(2002)
Reconsidering a Scientific Revolution: The Case of Einstein versus Lorentz
(/isis/citation/CBB000642049/)
Article
Nathaniel F. Sussman;
(2021)
Quick thinking: How Einstein did (and did not) refute the ether frame of reference
(/isis/citation/CBB233453742/)
Article
Christian Bracco;
Jean-Pierre Provost;
(2022)
First-order Relativity: From Fresnel’s 1818 “drag” coefficient to Lorentz’s 1895 “local time” followed by Poincare’s 1900 interpretation, and finally up to Einstein’s 1911-1912 spatially flat metric
(/isis/citation/CBB772782908/)
Article
Torretti, Roberto;
(2007)
Getting Rid of the Ether: Could Physics Have Achieved It Sooner, with Better Assistance from Philosophy?
(/isis/citation/CBB000933625/)
Article
Olivier Darrigol;
(2021)
Can we trust Einstein’s accounts of the genesis of special relativity?
(/isis/citation/CBB336192597/)
Book
Nersessian, Nancy J.;
(1984)
Faraday to Einstein: Constructing meaning in scientific theories
(/isis/citation/CBB000002139/)
Article
Hayes, Peter;
(2010)
Popper's Response to Dingle on Special Relativity and the Problem of the Observer
(/isis/citation/CBB001024229/)
Article
Brown, James Robert;
(2014)
Explaining, Seeing, and Understanding in Thought Experiments
(/isis/citation/CBB001421045/)
Article
Paweł Polak;
(2016)
Philosophy in science – a case of a reception of special and general theory of relativity in Kraków and Lwów before 1925 / Filozofia w nauce – studium przypadku recepcji szczególnej i ogólnej teorii względności w Krakowie oraz we Lwowie przed rokiem 1925
(/isis/citation/CBB510143275/)
Book
Cassani, Luisa;
Raccanelli, Bianca Maria;
(1988)
Un dibattito sull'etere: L'esperienza di Michelson-Morley nell'interpretazione di Lorentz
(/isis/citation/CBB000038415/)
Thesis
Leibowitz, Flora L.;
(1979)
Aspects of ether theory: A study in the philosophy of science
(/isis/citation/CBB001563277/)
Thesis
Janssen, Michael H. P.;
(1995)
A comparison between Lorentz's ether theory and special relativity in the light of the experiments of Trouton and Noble
(/isis/citation/CBB001565546/)
Article
Joël Dolbeault;
(2018)
Einstein et l’univers-bloc
(/isis/citation/CBB905178751/)
Article
Hannah Tomczyk;
(2022)
Did Einstein predict Bose-Einstein condensation?
(/isis/citation/CBB290033953/)
Article
Norton, John D.;
(2004)
Einstein's Investigations of Galilean Covariant Electrodynamics Prior to 1905
(/isis/citation/CBB000500494/)
Article
Hagar, Amit;
(2008)
Length Matters: The Einstein--Swann Correspondence and the Constructive Approach to the Special Theory of Relativity
(/isis/citation/CBB000933673/)
Book
Born, Max;
(2003)
Die Relativitätstheorie Einsteins
(/isis/citation/CBB000740385/)
Article
Hon, Giora;
Goldstein, Bernard R.;
(2006)
Symmetry and Asymmetry in Electrodynamics from Rowland to Einstein
(/isis/citation/CBB000771892/)
Article
J. Fernando Barbero G;
(2015)
Einstein, la luz, el espacio-tiempo y los cuantos
(/isis/citation/CBB841197044/)
Article
Kennedy, W. L.;
(2005)
On Einstein's 1905 Electrodynamics Paper
(/isis/citation/CBB000501569/)
Be the first to comment!