Article
ID: CBB358441182

Peer Review and Scholarly Originality: Let 1,000 Flowers Bloom, but Don’t Step on Any (January 2017)

unapi
Surveys Technoscience; science and technology studies Management; administration Creativity; genius Peer review 21st century United States

We examine the criticisms and subsequent changes that arise in the course of peer review. Fifty-two scholars who had recently published in Administrative Science Quarterly were surveyed regarding their peer review experience and how their article changed from initial journal submission to eventual publication. Papers that challenged theoretical perspectives faced distinctively high levels of criticism and change, particularly with attention to methodology, while those that offered a new perspective or that extended or combined established perspectives were less criticized and changed. The number of challenge-oriented publications was small as well, suggesting that either few such submissions survive the review process or few are submitted in the first place. Overall, peer review appears open to expansion of the variety of theoretical argument but does little to aid in the winnowing out of established perspectives.

...More
Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB358441182/

Similar Citations

Article Xiaofeng Tang; (December 2018)
Transaction Costs and Doomed Creditors (/isis/citation/CBB471725096/)

Article Asma El Ouirdi; Miriam El Ouirdi; Jesse Segers; Ivana Pais; (2015)
Institutional Predictors of the Adoption of Employee Social Media Policies (/isis/citation/CBB473729911/)

Article Dilshani Sarathchandra; (2017)
Risky Science? Perception and Negotiation of Risk in University Bioscience (/isis/citation/CBB691241938/)

Article Junhui Han; Zhengfeng Li; (June 2018)
How Metrics-Based Academic Evaluation Could Systematically Induce Academic Misconduct: A Case Study (/isis/citation/CBB909005401/)

Article Wolfgang Kaltenbrunner; Kean Birch; Maria Amuchastegui; (2022)
Editorial Work and the Peer Review Economy of STS Journals (/isis/citation/CBB351753437/)

Article Chaoxiong Zhang; Priscilla Song; (March 2020)
Translating Guān’ài in the People’s War on Drugs: Enacting Relations of Care in China’s State-Run Methadone Maintenance Treatment Program (/isis/citation/CBB667125425/)

Article Duckhee Jang; Doh Soogwan; Gil-Mo Kang; Dong-Seong Han; (January 2017)
Impact of Alumni Connections on Peer Review Ratings and Selection Success Rate in National Research (/isis/citation/CBB477207269/)

Article Lambros Roumbanis; (2019)
Peer Review or Lottery? A Critical Analysis of Two Different Forms of Decision-making Mechanisms for Allocation of Research Grants (/isis/citation/CBB181098680/)

Article Lambros Roumbanis; (2022)
Disagreement and Agonistic Chance in Peer Review (/isis/citation/CBB437513195/)

Article Elina I. Mäkinen; (2019)
The Power of Peer Review on Transdisciplinary Discovery (/isis/citation/CBB034066102/)

Article Edward J. Hackett; (July 2021)
The Ambivalence of Peer Review: Thank You ST&HV Reviewers 2019-2020 (/isis/citation/CBB912930423/)

Article Mikko Lagerspetz; (March 2021)
“The Grievance Studies Affair” Project: Reconstructing and Assessing the Experimental Design (/isis/citation/CBB538391440/)

Article Wolfgang Kaltenbrunner; Sarah de Rijcke; (December 2019)
Filling in the gaps: The interpretation of curricula vitae in peer review (/isis/citation/CBB339339084/)

Article Kris Hartley; (November 2021)
Public Trust and Political Legitimacy in the Smart City: A Reckoning for Technocracy (/isis/citation/CBB172268665/)

Article Emmanuel Didier; Catherine Guaspare-Cartron; (February 2018)
Research Note: The new watchdogs’ vision of science: A roundtable with Ivan Oransky (Retraction Watch) and Brandon Stell (PubPeer) (/isis/citation/CBB935591060/)

Article James Lawrence Powell; (2016)
The Consensus on Anthropogenic Global Warming Matters (/isis/citation/CBB862128887/)

Article Daniel Kinderman; (2023)
Donald Trump, anti-establishment populism and the revolving door between business and politics in the United States (/isis/citation/CBB137263615/)

Book Thomas Gryta; Ted Mann; (2020)
Lights out : Pride, delusion, and the fall of General Electric (/isis/citation/CBB105086357/)

Book Robert D. Krebs; (2018)
Riding the Rails: inside the business of America's railroads (/isis/citation/CBB226886470/)

Book Edwards, David; (2008)
Artscience: Creativity in the Post-Google Generation (/isis/citation/CBB001020029/)

Authors & Contributors
Roumbanis, Lambros
Kaltenbrunner, Wolfgang
Gil-Mo Kang
Kris Hartley
Li, Zhengfeng
Doh Soogwan
Journals
Science, Technology and Human Values
Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society
Social Studies of Science
East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal
Zeitschrift für Unternehmensgeschichte
IEEE Technology and Society Magazine
Publishers
Indiana University Press
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
Harvard University Press
Concepts
Technoscience; science and technology studies
Peer review
Scholarly publishing
Management; administration
Surveys
Research
People
Ivan Oransky
Trump, Donald H.
Discussion, Roundtable
Time Periods
21st century
20th century
20th century, late
Places
United States
China
South Korea
Hong Kong
Sweden
Germany
Institutions
General Electric Company
Universities and colleges--Alumni and alumnae
Biomed Central
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment

Creative Commons License REST API