This article contends that understandings of race and practices of racial differentiation underwent a significant epistemological shift around the first decades of the twentieth century. It reaches this conclusion via consideration of a dog breeding programme conducted by the statistician and hereditarian theorist Karl Pearson. In 1913, Pearson proclaimed that he, along with his collaborators Edward Nettleship and Charles Usher, had created a ‘new race’ of dog. Notable for its complete absence of hair pigmentation, this race appeared to demonstrate the potential that experimental animal breeding had for imperial policy-making. In differentiating his dogs from the Pekingese spaniels from which they had been produced, Pearson sought to show that ‘foreign’ animals could be made to approximate British racial standards. In Pearson's wake, animal breeding became an increasingly persuasive means by which scientists sought to legitimate racial contentions. By the 1920s, established anthropocentric approaches to human differentiation had begun to be replaced by new, animal-centred techniques and practices. Whereas nineteenth-century conceptions of race had primarily been articulated in relation to the study of human bodies, in the new race of the twentieth century, differentiation would involve study of and experimentation with bodies of all kinds – animal and human.
...More
Book
Logan, Cheryl A.;
(2013)
Hormones, Heredity, and Race: Spectacular Failure in Interwar Vienna
Book
Mackenzie Cooley;
(2022)
The Perfection of Nature: Animals, Breeding, and Race in the Renaissance
Book
Müller-Wille, Staffan;
Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg;
(2012)
A Cultural History of Heredity
Article
Cheang, Sarah;
(2006)
Women, Pets, and Imperialism: The British Pekingese Dog and Nostalgia for Old China
Article
Suman Seth;
(2021)
‘Constitutions selection’: Darwin, race and medicine
Article
Charles H. Pence;
(2022)
Of stirps and chromosomes: Generality through detail
Article
Rushton, A. R.;
(2000)
Nettleship, Pearson and Bateson: The biometric-Mendelian debate in a medical context
Article
Ogilvie, Marilyn Bailey;
(2007)
Inbreeding, Eugenics, and Helen Dean King (1869--1955)
Chapter
Kevles, Daniel J.;
(2011)
New Blood, New Fruits: Protections for Breeders and Originators, 1789--1930
Thesis
Matz, Brendan A.;
(2011)
Crafting Heredity: The Art and Science of Livestock Breeding in the United States and Germany, 1860--1914
Article
Berry, Dominic;
(2014)
The Plant Breeding Industry after Pure Line Theory: Lessons from the National Institute of Agricultural Botany
Article
Roger J. Wood;
(2015)
Darbishire expands his vision of heredity from Mendelian genetics to inherited memory
Article
Marianna Szczygielska;
(2022)
Undoing Extinction: The Role of Zoos in Breeding Back the Tarpan Wild Horse, 1922–1945
Article
Tyrrell, Brian;
(2015)
Bred for the Race: Thoroughbred Breeding and Racial Science in the United States, 1900--1940
Book
Michael Worboys;
Julie-Marie Strange;
Neil Pemberton;
(2018)
The Invention of the Modern Dog: Breed and Blood in Victorian Britain
Book
Kathryn Hughes;
(2024)
Catland: Louis Wain and the Great Cat Mania
Book
Edmund Russell;
(2018)
Greyhound Nation: A Coevolutionary History of England, 1200-1900
Article
Neil Humphrey;
(2024)
Working Like a Dog: Canine Labour, Technological Unemployment, and Extinction in Industrialising England
Article
Emily Stark;
Stephen Hoover;
Alexandra DeCesare;
Elan Barenholtz;
(December 2018)
Medicine Has Gone to the Dogs: Deep Learning and Robotic Olfaction to Mimic Working Dogs
Article
Brad Bolman;
(2022)
Dogs for Life: Beagles, Drugs, and Capital in the Twentieth Century
Be the first to comment!