Green, Sara (Author)
Dietrich, Michael R. (Author)
Leonelli, Sabina (Author)
Ankeny, Rachel A. (Author)
Many biologists appeal to the so-called Krogh principle when justifying their choice of experimental organisms. The principle states that “for a large number of problems there will be some animal of choice, or a few such animals, on which it can be most conveniently studied”. Despite its popularity, the principle is often critiqued for implying unwarranted generalizations from optimal models. We argue that the Krogh principle should be interpreted in relation to the historical and scientific contexts in which it has been developed and used. We interpret the Krogh Principle as a heuristic, i.e., as a recommendation to approach biological problems through organisms where a specific trait or physiological mechanism is expected to be most distinctively displayed or most experimentally accessible. We designate these organisms “Krogh organisms”. We clarify the differences between uses of model organisms and non-standard Krogh organisms. Among these is the use of Krogh organisms as “negative models” in biomedical research, where organisms are chosen for their dissimilarity to human physiology. Importantly, the representational scope of Krogh organisms and the generalizability of their characteristics are not fixed or assumed but explored through experimental studies. Research on Krogh organisms is steeped in the comparative method characteristic of zoology and comparative physiology, in which studies of biological variation produce insights into general physiological constraints. Accordingly, we conclude that the Krogh principle exemplifies the advantages of studying biological variation as a strategy to produce generalizable insights.
...More
Article
Tarquin Holmes;
(2017)
The wild type as concept and in experimental practice: A history of its role in classical genetics and evolutionary theory
(/isis/citation/CBB016897194/)
Article
Joan Steigerwald;
(2016)
Entanglements of instruments and media in investigating organic life
(/isis/citation/CBB126105384/)
Book
Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg;
(2010)
An Epistemology of the Concrete
(/isis/citation/CBB001023158/)
Article
Ankeny, Rachel A.;
Leonelli, Sabina;
(2011)
What's So Special about Model Organisms?
(/isis/citation/CBB001024174/)
Article
Karen A. Rader;
(2022)
Reflections on Making Mice (2004)
(/isis/citation/CBB321873815/)
Article
James W. E. Lowe;
(2016)
Normal development and experimental embryology: Edmund Beecher Wilson and Amphioxus
(/isis/citation/CBB114945953/)
Book
Snait B. Gissis;
Ehud Lamm;
Ayelet Shavit;
(2018)
Landscapes of Collectivity in the Life Sciences
(/isis/citation/CBB644950362/)
Article
Bechtel, William;
(2010)
The Cell: Locus or Object of Inquiry?
(/isis/citation/CBB001023957/)
Book
Derek M. Jones;
(2020)
The Biological Foundations of Action
(/isis/citation/CBB052669120/)
Book
Thomas Heams;
(2019)
Infravies: Le vivant sans frontières
(/isis/citation/CBB584057008/)
Article
Christopher H. Pearson;
(2018)
Theoricity and Homology: A Reply to Roffe, Ginnobili, and Blanco
(/isis/citation/CBB690540493/)
Article
Lauren N. Ross;
(2021)
Causal Concepts in Biology: How Pathways Differ from Mechanisms and Why It Matters
(/isis/citation/CBB579689608/)
Article
M. Polo Camacho;
(2020)
What’s All the Fuss About? The Inheritance of Acquired Traits Is Compatible with the Central Dogma
(/isis/citation/CBB631370808/)
Article
Pierre-Olivier Méthot;
(2022)
An Epistemology of Scientific Practice: Positioning Hans-Jörg Rheinberger in Twentieth-Century History and Philosophy of Biology
(/isis/citation/CBB538733869/)
Article
Marc Henry;
(2021)
Thermodynamics of Life
(/isis/citation/CBB851479700/)
Article
André Ariew;
Collin Rice;
Yasha Rohwer;
(2015)
Autonomous-Statistical Explanations and Natural Selection
(/isis/citation/CBB996717651/)
Chapter
Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg;
(2007)
Note sur une épistémologie de la biologie contemporaine
(/isis/citation/CBB001022516/)
Article
Sergio Balari;
Guillermo Lorenzo;
(2019)
Realization in Biology?
(/isis/citation/CBB746887035/)
Thesis
Valerie Racine;
(2016)
Beyond Reductionism and Emergence: A Study of the Epistemic Practices in Gene Expression Research
(/isis/citation/CBB978842577/)
Book
Daniel J. Nicholson;
John Dupré;
(2018)
Everything Flows: Towards a Processual Philosophy of Biology
(/isis/citation/CBB861260484/)
Be the first to comment!