This paper aims to show that the development of Feyerabend's philosophical ideas in the 1950s and 1960s largely took place in the context of debates on quantum mechanics. In particular, he developed his influential arguments for pluralism in science in discussions with the quantum physicist David Bohm, who had developed an alternative approach to quantum physics which (in Feyerabend's perception) was met with a dogmatic dismissal by some of the leading quantum physicists. I argue that Feyerabend's arguments for theoretical pluralism and for challenging established theories were connected to his objections to the dogmatism and conservatism he observed in quantum physics. However, as Feyerabend gained insight into the physical details and historical complexities which led to the development of quantum mechanics, he gradually became more modest in his criticisms. His writings on quantum mechanics especially engaged with Niels Bohr; initially, he was critical of Bohr's work in quantum mechanics, but in the late 1960s, he completely withdrew his criticism and even praised Bohr as a model scientist. He became convinced that however puzzling quantum mechanics seemed, it was methodologically unobjectionable – and this was crucial for his move towards ‘anarchism’ in philosophy of science.
...More
Book
Bokulich, Alisa;
(2008)
Reexamining the Quantum-Classical Relation: Beyond Reductionism and Pluralism
(/isis/citation/CBB001032943/)
Article
Matthews, Michael R.;
(2012)
Mario Bunge, Systematic Philosophy and Science Education: An Introduction
(/isis/citation/CBB001252225/)
Article
Cuffaro, Michael;
(2010)
The Kantian Framework of Complementarity
(/isis/citation/CBB001024225/)
Article
Rigden, John S.;
Stuewer, Roger H.;
(2012)
Understanding of Quantum Mechanics Eludes Physicists for Eighty-Six Years
(/isis/citation/CBB001221642/)
Book
Plotnitsky, Arkady;
(2010)
Epistemology and Probability: Bohr, Heisenberg, Schrödinger and the Nature of Quantum-Theoretical Thinking
(/isis/citation/CBB001230453/)
Article
Jamie Shaw;
(2021)
Feyerabend and manufactured disagreement: reflections on expertise, consensus, and science policy
(/isis/citation/CBB740430654/)
Article
Jamie Shaw;
(2021)
Feyerabend’s well-ordered science: how an anarchist distributes funds
(/isis/citation/CBB905453313/)
Article
Shomar, Towfic;
(2008)
Bohr as a Phenomenological Realist
(/isis/citation/CBB001230072/)
Thesis
Lee, Jeongmin;
(2006)
Bohr vs. Bohm: Interpreting Quantum Theory through the Philosophical Tradition
(/isis/citation/CBB001561463/)
Book
Pietro Greco;
(2020)
Quanti. La straordinaria storia della meccanica quantistica
(/isis/citation/CBB247197978/)
Article
Jamie Shaw;
(2017)
Was Feyerabend an Anarchist? The Structure(s) of ‘anything Goes’
(/isis/citation/CBB234128519/)
Article
Lisa Heller;
(2016)
Between Relativism and Pluralism: Philosophical and Political Relativism in Feyerabend's Late Work
(/isis/citation/CBB660760906/)
Article
Gonzalo Munévar;
(2016)
Historical Antecedents to the Philosophy of Paul Feyerabend
(/isis/citation/CBB421620184/)
Book
Stenholm, Stig;
(2011)
The Quest for Reality: Bohr and Wittgenstein: Two Complementary Views
(/isis/citation/CBB001500296/)
Chapter
Thomas Mormann;
(2015)
From Mathematics to Quantum Mechanics – On the Conceptual Unity of Cassirer's Philosophy of Science (1907–1937)
(/isis/citation/CBB281633633/)
Book
Paul Feyerabend;
Ian Hacking;
(2010)
Against Method
(/isis/citation/CBB545479236/)
Book
Camilleri, Kristian;
(2009)
Heisenberg and the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics: The Physicist as Philosopher
(/isis/citation/CBB000951622/)
Article
Jan Faye;
Rasmus Jaksland;
(2021)
What Bohr wanted Carnap to learn from quantum mechanics
(/isis/citation/CBB067212277/)
Article
Bokulich, Alisa;
(2008)
Paul Dirac and the Einstein-Bohr Debate
(/isis/citation/CBB000831776/)
Article
Sahotra Sarkar;
(2015)
Nagel on Reduction
(/isis/citation/CBB557469066/)
Be the first to comment!