Radical pluralism, classificatory norms and the legitimacy of species classifications (2019)
Conix, Stijn (Author)
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences
Volume: 73
Pages: 27-34
Moderate pluralism is a popular position in contemporary philosophy of biology. Despite its popularity, various authors have argued that it tends to slide off into a radical form of pluralism that is both normatively and descriptively unacceptable. This paper looks at the case of biological species classification, and evaluates a popular way of avoiding radical pluralism by relying on the shared aims and norms of a discipline. The main contention is that while these aims and norms may play an important role in the legitimacy of species classifications, they fail to fend off radical pluralism. It follows from this that the legitimacy of species classifications is also determined by local decisions about the aims of research and how to operationalize and balance these. This is important, I argue, because it means that any acceptable view on the legitimacy of classification should be able to account for these local decisions.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Gregory J. Morgan;
(2016)
What is a virus species? Radical pluralism in viral taxonomy
(/isis/citation/CBB950706395/)
Article
Reydon, Thomas A. C.;
(2005)
On the Nature of the Species Problem and the Four Meanings of `Species'
(/isis/citation/CBB000501587/)
Article
Reydon, Thomas A. C.;
(2003)
Discussion: Species Are Individuals; Or Are They?
(/isis/citation/CBB000410818/)
Chapter
Selosse, Philippe;
(2008)
Les concepts de genre et d'espèce á travers l'évolution du modèle logique de la définition, de l'Antiquité à Linné
(/isis/citation/CBB001221146/)
Chapter
Lherminier, Philippe;
(2008)
Du genre
(/isis/citation/CBB001221151/)
Article
Müller-Wille, Staffan;
Charmantier, Isabelle;
(2012)
Natural History and Information Overload: The Case of Linnaeus
(/isis/citation/CBB001221582/)
Article
Pedroso, Makmiller;
(2012)
Essentialism, History, and Biological Taxa
(/isis/citation/CBB001221601/)
Article
Vincent Cuypers;
Thomas A. C. Reydon;
(2023)
An oak is an oak, or not? Understanding and dealing with confusion and disagreement in biological classification
(/isis/citation/CBB851306098/)
Article
Aaron Novick;
W. Ford Doolittle;
(2021)
‘Species’ without species
(/isis/citation/CBB782782852/)
Chapter
Lherminier, Philippe;
(2008)
Une seule classification ou des classifications différentes et disjointes pour chaque règne?
(/isis/citation/CBB001221148/)
Article
Brigandt, Ingo;
(2013)
Explanation in Biology: Reduction, Pluralism, and Explanatory Aims
(/isis/citation/CBB001252313/)
Article
F. Boem;
E. Ratti;
M. Andreoletti;
G. Boniolo;
(2016)
Why genes are like lemons
(/isis/citation/CBB006967276/)
Article
M. Polo Camacho;
(2020)
What’s All the Fuss About? The Inheritance of Acquired Traits Is Compatible with the Central Dogma
(/isis/citation/CBB631370808/)
Article
Deleporte, Pierre;
(2012)
The Systemist Emergentist View of Mahner and Bunge on “Species as Individuals”: What Use for Science and Education
(/isis/citation/CBB001252234/)
Article
Stamos, David N.;
(2002)
Species, Languages, and the Horizontal/Vertical Distinction
(/isis/citation/CBB000200252/)
Article
Powers, Jack;
(2013)
Finding Ernst Mayr's Plato
(/isis/citation/CBB001213711/)
Book
Ayala, Francisco José;
Arp, Robert;
(2010)
Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology
(/isis/citation/CBB001032775/)
Article
Sandy C. Boucher;
(2017)
Gould on species, metaphysics and macroevolution: A critical appraisal
(/isis/citation/CBB083237950/)
Article
Johnson, Kristin;
(2004)
The Tail End of the Moth: Clarifying Species Boundaries
(/isis/citation/CBB000610171/)
Article
LaPorte, Joseph;
(2003)
Does a Type Specimen Necessarily or Contingently Belong to Its Species?
(/isis/citation/CBB000340591/)
Be the first to comment!