Scientific models typically contain idealizations, or assumptions that are known not to be true. Philosophers have long questioned the nature of idealizations: Are they heuristic tools that will be abandoned? Or rather fictional representations of reality? And how can we reconcile them with realism about knowledge of nature? Immanuel Kant developed an account of scientific investigation that can inspire a new approach to the contemporary debate. Kant argued that scientific investigation is possible only if guided by ideal assumptions—what he calls “regulative ideas”. These ideas are not true of objects of nature, and yet they are not heuristic tools or fictional representations. They are necessary rules governing the construction and assessment of scientific explanations. In this paper, I suggest that some idealizations can be interpreted as having necessary regulative value and as being compatible with scientific realism. I first analyze the puzzle of the nature of idealization and present the main approaches to this topic in the literature. Second, I reconsider the puzzle vis-à-vis a restricted, Kantian definition of idealization and a novel characterization of the relation between idealization and truth. Finally, I discuss in detail an example of idealization (the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium) along the suggested Kantian lines.
...More
Book
Collin Rice;
(2021)
Leveraging Distortions: Explanation, Idealization, and Universality in Science
(/isis/citation/CBB912709886/)
Article
Scott Harkema;
(2024)
Berkeley on true motion
(/isis/citation/CBB910533001/)
Article
Vihalemm, Rein;
(2013)
Interpreting Kant's Conception of Proper Science in Practical Realism
(/isis/citation/CBB001451592/)
Book
Lucy Allais;
(2015)
Manifest Reality: Kant's Idealism and his Realism
(/isis/citation/CBB261573699/)
Article
Finnur Dellsén;
(2019)
Should scientific realists embrace theoretical conservatism?
(/isis/citation/CBB125490244/)
Article
Fiora Salis;
(2021)
The New Fiction View of Models
(/isis/citation/CBB270986404/)
Article
Gelfert, Axel;
(2011)
Model-Based Representation in Scientific Practice: New Perspectives
(/isis/citation/CBB001024167/)
Article
Nélida Gentile;
Susana Lucero;
(2024)
On compatibility between realism and fictionalism: A response to Suárez' proposal
(/isis/citation/CBB330901015/)
Book
Parsons, Keith M.;
(2014)
It Started with Copernicus: Vital Questions about Science
(/isis/citation/CBB001510107/)
Book
Achinstein, Peter;
(2010)
Evidence, Explanation, and Realism: Essays in Philosophy of Science
(/isis/citation/CBB001023128/)
Article
David Merritt;
(2021)
Cosmological Realism
(/isis/citation/CBB244895079/)
Article
K. Brad Wray;
(2021)
Kuhn and the Contemporary Realism/Antirealism Debates
(/isis/citation/CBB645916934/)
Book
Magnani, Lorenzo;
Nersessian, Nancy J.;
(2002)
Model Based Reasoning: Science, Technology, Values
(/isis/citation/CBB000201255/)
Book
Bailer-Jones, Daniela;
(2009)
Scientific Models in Philosophy of Science
(/isis/citation/CBB001033331/)
Book
Zigman, Peter;
(2000)
Einblicke in eine sterbende Ära: Das Ende des Mythos der guten alten Zeiten
(/isis/citation/CBB000102643/)
Article
Ivic, Sanja;
(2013)
The Truth as a Non-Reference: Realist and Antirealist Conception of Reference
(/isis/citation/CBB001253031/)
Book
Psillos, Stathis;
(1999)
Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth
(/isis/citation/CBB000110803/)
Article
Redhead, Michael;
Lipton, Peter;
Douven, Igor;
Bueno, Otávio;
(2001)
Quests of a Realist
(/isis/citation/CBB000100398/)
Chapter
Marco Giovanelli;
(2024)
Il 'problema della materia' nella Scuola di Marburgo
(/isis/citation/CBB789939770/)
Chapter
Sebastian Luft;
(2024)
Neo-Kantian and Neo-Pragmatic Accounts of Culture: Cassirer and Rorty
(/isis/citation/CBB844395947/)
Be the first to comment!