Article ID: CBB333309152

Let’s (not) talk about synthetic biology: Framing an emerging technology in public and stakeholder dialogues (2020)

unapi

Synthetic biology is an emerging technoscience, which, so far, lacks a broader public debate. To foster early societal dialogue, a range of public engagement events have been initiated over the past decade. This article discusses the configurations of the emerging debate on synthetic biology in the context of the EU FP7 project SYNENERGENE. Drawing on notions of frames and framing in media studies and policy analysis, we ask which distinct frames are invoked and become dominant in current discussions about synthetic biology. Our analysis indicates significant reconfigurations in the framing of synthetic biology compared with previous biotechnology debates. Frames that traditionally served to problematize biotechnology, that is, ethics, risks, and economics, become less dominant. Instead, the potential to contribute to social progress is placed in the foreground. Moreover, discussions on ethics, risks, and governance frequently occur on an abstract level, invoking generic statements that could be made for any new technology.

...More
Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB333309152/

Similar Citations

Article Medeiros, Flavia Natercia da Silva; (2013)
Fora da ordem natural: a natureza nos discursos sobre a clonagem e a pesquisa com células-tronco em jornais brasileiros

Article Mirko Ancillotti; Niklas Holmberg; Mikael Lindfelt; Stefan Eriksson; (2015)
Uncritical and Unbalanced Coverage of Synthetic Biology in the Nordic Press

Article Sebastian Ureta; (January 2021)
Ruination Science: Producing Knowledge from a Toxic World

Article Burgess, Michael M.; (2014)
From “Trust Us” to Participatory Governance: Deliberative Publics and Science Policy

Article Hadrien Macq; Élise Tancoigne; Bruno J. Strasser; (2020)
From Deliberation to Production: Public Participation in Science and Technology Policies of the European Commission (1998–2019)

Article P. Sol Hart; Lauren Feldman; (2021)
The Benefit of Focusing on Air Pollution Instead of Climate Change: How Discussing Power Plant Emissions in the Context of Air Pollution, Rather than Climate Change, Influences Perceived Benefits, Costs, and Political Action for Policies to Limit Emissions

Article Becky Mansfield; (2021)
Deregulatory science: Chemical risk analysis in Trump’s EPA

Article Sara Giordano; (May 2018)
New Democratic Sciences, Ethics, and Proper Publics

Article Hindmarsh, Richard; Gottweis, Herbert; (2005)
Recombinant Regulation: The Asilomar Legacy 30 Years On

Article Kleinman, Daniel Lee; Kinchy, Abby J.; (2003)
Why Ban Bovine Growth Hormone? Science, Social Welfare, and the Divergent Biotech Policy Landscapes in Europe and the United States

Article Graham Dixon; Jay Hmielowski; Yanni Ma; (August 2017)
Improving Climate Change Acceptance Among U.S. Conservatives Through Value-Based Message Targeting

Article Hird, Myra J; Lougheed, Scott; Rowe, R Kerry; Kuyvenhoven, Cassandra; (2014)
Making Waste Management Public (or Falling Back to Sleep)

Article James Owen Weatherall; Cailin O’Connor; Justin P. Bruner; (2020)
How to Beat Science and Influence People: Policymakers and Propaganda in Epistemic Networks

Article Massarani, Luisa; (2005)
Ciência, tecnologia, parlamento e os diálogos com os cidadãos

Book Gabriela Méndez Cota; (2016)
Disrupting maize: Food, biotechnology, and nationalism in contemporary Mexico

Book Sheila Jasanoff; Sang-Hyun Kim; (2015)
Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power

Article Reese Butterfuss; Joseph Aubele; Panayiota Kendeou; (2020)
Hedged Language and Partisan Media Influence Belief in Science Claims

Article Christel W. van Eck; Bob C. Mulder; Art Dewulf; (2020)
Online Climate Change Polarization: Interactional Framing Analysis of Climate Change Blog Comments

Article P. Sol Hart; Sedona Chinn; Stuart Soroka; (2020)
Politicization and Polarization in COVID-19 News Coverage

Article Critchley, Christine R.; (2008)
Public Opinion and Trust in Scientists: The Role of the Research Context, and the Perceived Motivation of Stem Cell Researchers

Authors & Contributors
P. Sol Hart
Burgess, Michael M.
Critchley, Christine R.
Gottweis, Herbert
Hindmarsh, Richard
Hird, Myra J
Journals
Science Communication
Public Understanding of Science
História, Ciências, Saúde---Manguinhos
Science as Culture
Science, Technology, and Human Values
Social Studies of Science
Publishers
Rowman & Littlefield
University of Chicago Press
Concepts
Science and politics
Public opinion
Public understanding of science
Science and technology studies (STS)
Biotechnology
Communication of scientific ideas
People
Latour, Bruno
Marres, Noortje
Trump, Donald H.
Time Periods
21st century
20th century, late
20th century
Places
European Union
Brazil
Chile
Australia
Denmark
Ontario (Canada)
Institutions
United States. Environmental Protection Agency
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment