Anja Bauer (Author)
Alexander Bogner (Author)
Synthetic biology is an emerging technoscience, which, so far, lacks a broader public debate. To foster early societal dialogue, a range of public engagement events have been initiated over the past decade. This article discusses the configurations of the emerging debate on synthetic biology in the context of the EU FP7 project SYNENERGENE. Drawing on notions of frames and framing in media studies and policy analysis, we ask which distinct frames are invoked and become dominant in current discussions about synthetic biology. Our analysis indicates significant reconfigurations in the framing of synthetic biology compared with previous biotechnology debates. Frames that traditionally served to problematize biotechnology, that is, ethics, risks, and economics, become less dominant. Instead, the potential to contribute to social progress is placed in the foreground. Moreover, discussions on ethics, risks, and governance frequently occur on an abstract level, invoking generic statements that could be made for any new technology.
...More
Article
Medeiros, Flavia Natercia da Silva;
(2013)
Fora da ordem natural: a natureza nos discursos sobre a clonagem e a pesquisa com células-tronco em jornais brasileiros
Article
Mirko Ancillotti;
Niklas Holmberg;
Mikael Lindfelt;
Stefan Eriksson;
(2015)
Uncritical and Unbalanced Coverage of Synthetic Biology in the Nordic Press
Article
Sebastian Ureta;
(January 2021)
Ruination Science: Producing Knowledge from a Toxic World
Article
Burgess, Michael M.;
(2014)
From “Trust Us” to Participatory Governance: Deliberative Publics and Science Policy
Article
Hadrien Macq;
Élise Tancoigne;
Bruno J. Strasser;
(2020)
From Deliberation to Production: Public Participation in Science and Technology Policies of the European Commission (1998–2019)
Article
P. Sol Hart;
Lauren Feldman;
(2021)
The Benefit of Focusing on Air Pollution Instead of Climate Change: How Discussing Power Plant Emissions in the Context of Air Pollution, Rather than Climate Change, Influences Perceived Benefits, Costs, and Political Action for Policies to Limit Emissions
Article
Becky Mansfield;
(2021)
Deregulatory science: Chemical risk analysis in Trump’s EPA
Article
Sara Giordano;
(May 2018)
New Democratic Sciences, Ethics, and Proper Publics
Article
Hindmarsh, Richard;
Gottweis, Herbert;
(2005)
Recombinant Regulation: The Asilomar Legacy 30 Years On
Article
Kleinman, Daniel Lee;
Kinchy, Abby J.;
(2003)
Why Ban Bovine Growth Hormone? Science, Social Welfare, and the Divergent Biotech Policy Landscapes in Europe and the United States
Article
Graham Dixon;
Jay Hmielowski;
Yanni Ma;
(August 2017)
Improving Climate Change Acceptance Among U.S. Conservatives Through Value-Based Message Targeting
Article
Hird, Myra J;
Lougheed, Scott;
Rowe, R Kerry;
Kuyvenhoven, Cassandra;
(2014)
Making Waste Management Public (or Falling Back to Sleep)
Article
James Owen Weatherall;
Cailin O’Connor;
Justin P. Bruner;
(2020)
How to Beat Science and Influence People: Policymakers and Propaganda in Epistemic Networks
Article
Massarani, Luisa;
(2005)
Ciência, tecnologia, parlamento e os diálogos com os cidadãos
Book
Gabriela Méndez Cota;
(2016)
Disrupting maize: Food, biotechnology, and nationalism in contemporary Mexico
Book
Sheila Jasanoff;
Sang-Hyun Kim;
(2015)
Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power
Article
Reese Butterfuss;
Joseph Aubele;
Panayiota Kendeou;
(2020)
Hedged Language and Partisan Media Influence Belief in Science Claims
Article
Christel W. van Eck;
Bob C. Mulder;
Art Dewulf;
(2020)
Online Climate Change Polarization: Interactional Framing Analysis of Climate Change Blog Comments
Article
P. Sol Hart;
Sedona Chinn;
Stuart Soroka;
(2020)
Politicization and Polarization in COVID-19 News Coverage
Article
Critchley, Christine R.;
(2008)
Public Opinion and Trust in Scientists: The Role of the Research Context, and the Perceived Motivation of Stem Cell Researchers
Be the first to comment!