Claessens, Guy (Author)
This paper examines the philosophy of mathematics developed by Pietro Catena (1501-1576), who held the chair of mathematics in Padua from 1547 until his death. Catena’s views on the ontology and epistemology of mathematical objects are generally reconstructed on the basis of his Universa loca in logicam Aristotelis in mathematicas disciplinas (venice, 1556). According to recent scholarship, Catena emerges as an adherent of a Platonic theory of mathematics: he is believed to maintain that mathematical objects are innate, and that the senses do not play an essential role in the genesis of mathematical knowledge. Nonetheless, Catena’s Oratio pro idea methodi (Padua, 1563) appears to display a traditional Aristotelian conception of mathematics, which regards geometrical objects as abstractions, separated from sensible objects by thought. If both readings are correct, it appears that we should assume an internal shift or evolution in Catena’s thought. In this article I will argue that a proper reading of Catena’s oeuvre reveals a consistent and coherent theory of mathematics, which renders the assumption of such a shift or evolution redundant. In my interpretation Catena turns out to be a sixteenth-century Aristotelian, rather than a pioneering (Neo)platonist.
...More
Article
Maria Antonia Rancadore;
(2017)
Elementi di psicologia empirica in Aristotele e Pomponazzi
(/isis/citation/CBB369855702/)
Chapter
Anna Laura Puliafito Bleuel;
(2012)
Strategie retoriche? Metafora ed esempio nella filosofia naturale di Francesco Patrizi
(/isis/citation/CBB043213859/)
Book
Vojtech Hladký;
(2014)
The Philosophy of Gemistos Plethon: Platonism in Late Byzantium, between Hellenism and Orthodoxy
(/isis/citation/CBB238380578/)
Article
Teodoro Katinis;
(2003)
Sulle fonti aristoteliche e platoniche del "Consilio contro la pestilentia" di Ficino
(/isis/citation/CBB667745269/)
Article
Edelheit, Amos;
(2009)
Francesco Patrizi's Two Books on Space: Geometry, Mathematics, and Dialectic beyond Aristotelian Science
(/isis/citation/CBB000932499/)
Article
Stefano Gulizia;
(2019)
The Philosophy of Mathematics in Gian Vincenzo Pinelli’s Papers
(/isis/citation/CBB124961508/)
Book
Forlivesi, Marco;
(2009)
Antonio Bernardi della Mirandola (1502--1565). Un aristotelico umanista alla corte dei Farnese
(/isis/citation/CBB001020668/)
Article
Maurizio Erto;
(2017)
'Giocare col fuoco' nel Seicento. Esperimenti e osservazioni naturalistiche nella Solfatara di Pozzuoli
(/isis/citation/CBB764648200/)
Article
Prete, Ivano Dal;
(2014)
“Being the World Eternal …”: The Age of the Earth in Renaissance Italy
(/isis/citation/CBB001450158/)
Book
Sgarbi, Marco;
(2014)
The Italian Mind: Vernacular Logic in Renaissance Italy (1540--1551)
(/isis/citation/CBB001213963/)
Chapter
Palmerino, Carla Rita;
(2011)
Galileo's Use of Medieval Thought Experiments
(/isis/citation/CBB001321021/)
Book
Ward, Ann;
(2009)
Matter and Form: From Natural Science to Political Philosophy
(/isis/citation/CBB001201150/)
Article
François Roudaut;
(2021)
Bessarion et la France
(/isis/citation/CBB804010350/)
Article
Dong-Yuan, Tai;
(2012)
Causation and Essence: The Discrepancies in Metaphysics of Scientific Thoughts between Kepler and Galileo
(/isis/citation/CBB001213715/)
Chapter
Peruzzi, Enrico;
(2006)
La poetica del Naugerius tra platonismo e aristotelismo
(/isis/citation/CBB000741118/)
Chapter
Monfasani, John;
(2004)
Aristotelians, Platonists and the Missing Ockhamists: Philosophical Liberty in Pre-Reformation Italy
(/isis/citation/CBB000641020/)
Article
Miguel Granada;
(2020)
Conflagración en el Renacimiento
(/isis/citation/CBB254176492/)
Article
Fosca Mariani Zini;
(2021)
Un échange conflictuel : quelle est la meilleure philosophie ?
(/isis/citation/CBB689225158/)
Chapter
Shinichiro, Higashi;
(2004)
Entre épistémologie et métaphysique. La philosophie aristotélicienne des mathématiques au XVIe siécle
(/isis/citation/CBB000650864/)
Article
Presti, Roberto Lo;
(2014)
The Theory of the Circulation of Blood and (Different) Paths of Aristotelianism. Girolamo Franzosi's De motu cordis et sanguinis in animalibus pro Aristotele et Galeno adversus anatomicos neotericos libri duo: Teleology versus Mechanism?
(/isis/citation/CBB001451907/)
Be the first to comment!