Thesis ID: CBB329830813

A History of Human Physiology and 17th C. Philosophy: Descartes, Spinoza, and the Current State of Neuroscience (2020)

unapi

In the early 1630s, René Descartes developed a speculative treatise on the functional structures of the human body and brain. His work, The Treatise on Man, constituted the first attempt at a complete human physiology, inspiring a generation of scientists and physicians who developed Descartes’ speculations into a genuine field of scientific inquiry. It is the intent of this discussion to determine how Descartes’ speculations in human physiology influenced the direction of 17th c. European philosophy. The above question is often dismissed by scholars who argue that Descartes abandons scientific pursuits for philosophy, finding that science could not provide the kind of knowledge Descartes craved. In contrast, I argue that the themes that emerge in the Treatise are continually developed by Descartes throughout his philosophic career. This is evident in Meditations on First Philosophy, where Descartes demonstrates a preoccupation with (1) the possible resemblance between sensory ideas and their objects and (2) the independence of our nature as a thinking thing from our nature as a corporeal body, topics of great importance in the Treatise. Descartes’ contemporaries, specifically Spinoza, were influenced by these scientific speculations. In the Ethics, Spinoza identifies Descartes’ account of human nature as the specific view he intends to critique and replace with a novel account of human nature, i.e. the conatus doctrine. While ultimately in disagreement with Descartes, Spinoza freely turns to human physiology to both attack Descartes’ views and construct his own account of human nature. Thus, far from rejecting the place of the human sciences in philosophy, Spinoza embraces it. Finally, as a means of demonstrating the philosophic value of Descartes and Spinoza’s engagement with human physiology, I employ their metaphysical insights in a critique of contemporary scientific research. Specifically, I will evaluate neuroscientific studies on the phantom limb, arguing that, in their explanations, researchers tend to unreflectively employ the metaphysical assumption that neural structures work to support an accurate representation of the body to the subject. While this view may ultimately prove correct, it blinds researchers to alternative explanations

...More
Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB329830813/

Similar Citations

Article Bassiri, Nima; (2012)
Material Translations in the Cartesian Brain (/isis/citation/CBB001221608/)

Chapter Enrico Giannetto; (2009)
La Fisica di Spinoza fra Descartes e Newton e la sua influenza su Einstein (/isis/citation/CBB550074250/)

Book Fabrizio Baldassarri; (2021)
Il metodo al tavolo anatomico: Descartes e la medicina (/isis/citation/CBB773621333/)

Article Delphine Kolesnik-Antoine; (2013)
La question des passions chez Regius et Descartes. Premiéres éléments d’interpretation (/isis/citation/CBB224148914/)

Book Paolo Pecere; (2023)
La natura della mente. Da Cartesio alle scienze cognitive (/isis/citation/CBB751480142/)

Chapter Garber, Daniel; (2007)
Mécanisme et morale: la mort du corps et l'éternité de l'esprit chez Spinoza (/isis/citation/CBB001022505/)

Article Raphaële Andrault; (2019)
Spinoza's Missing Physiology (/isis/citation/CBB082059290/)

Thesis Lin, Martin Thomas; (2001)
Spinoza's Theory of Desire (/isis/citation/CBB001560516/)

Book Damasio, Antonio R.; (2003)
Looking for Spinoza: Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling Brain (/isis/citation/CBB000320252/)

Book Nachtomy, Ohad; Smith, Justin E. H.; (2014)
The Life Sciences in Early Modern Philosophy (/isis/citation/CBB001551476/)

Book Huenemann, Charlie; (2008)
Understanding Rationalism (/isis/citation/CBB000950265/)

Book Alexandre Koyré; Andrea Cavazzini; (2023)
Scritti su Spinoza e l’averroismo (/isis/citation/CBB295676571/)

Thesis Bray, Michael Edward, Jr.; (2002)
The science and politics of the efficient cause in Hobbes and Spinoza (/isis/citation/CBB001562181/)

Thesis Christopher P. Noble; (2016)
The Soul as Spiritual Automaton in Leibniz's Synthetic Natural Philosophy (/isis/citation/CBB700001563/)

Article Louis Rouquayrol; (2020)
Le problème du cercle de la méthode chez Ramus, Descartes et Spinoza (/isis/citation/CBB020139631/)

Article Federico Boccaccini; Anna Marmodoro; (2017)
Powers, Abilities and Skills in Early Modern Philosophy (/isis/citation/CBB647362818/)

Chapter Rousset, Bernard; (2001)
Spinoza et le doute cartésien (/isis/citation/CBB000102848/)

Authors & Contributors
Boccaccini, Federico
Christopher P. Noble
Baldassarri, Fabrizio
Bigotti, Fabrizio
Rouquayrol, Louis
Pecere, Paolo
Concepts
Philosophy
Natural philosophy
Mind and body
Physiology
Mechanism; mechanical philosophy
Human body
Time Periods
17th century
Early modern
20th century
18th century
16th century
Modern
Places
Europe
France
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment