The project of integrated HPS (‘integrated history and philosophy of science’) has occupied philosophers of science in one form or another since at least the 1960s. Yet, despite this substantial interest in bringing together philosophical and historical reflections on the nature of science, history of science and formal philosophy of science remain as divided as ever. In this paper, I will argue that the continuing separation between historical and formal philosophy of science is ill-founded. I will argue for this in both abstract and concrete terms. At the abstract level, I reconstruct two possible arguments for the incompatibility of historical and formal philosophy of science and argue that they are both wanting. At the concrete level, I discuss how historical and formal philosophy of science have been brought together in practice, namely: in the form of a largely forgotten research tradition that I will refer to here as the study of formalized macro-units. After a brief exposition, I argue that this research tradition has been unduly overlooked by historically minded philosophers of science. Bringing together these observations, I argue that the divide between historical and formal philosophy of science is not grounded in any substantive arguments, but can be primarily attributed to disciplinary happenstance.
...More
Article
Mahdi Khelfaoui;
Yves Gingras;
Maël Lemoine;
Thomas Pradeu;
(2021)
The visibility of philosophy of science in the sciences, 1980–2018
(/isis/citation/CBB491402116/)
Article
Drees, Willem B.;
(2013)
Rich Religion and Science: Asian Religions, Ian Barbour, and Much Else
(/isis/citation/CBB001201403/)
Article
Di Giandomenico, Mauro;
(2018)
Cinquant'anni del Seminario di Storia della Scienza dell'Ateneo barese (1967-2017)
(/isis/citation/CBB189925500/)
Article
Jan Surman;
(2021)
Productive marginalities: The history of science in/about Poland since 1989
(/isis/citation/CBB407601366/)
Article
Stephen J. Weininger;
(2022)
“The Poor Sister:” Coming to Grips with Recent and Contemporary Chemistry
(/isis/citation/CBB175973451/)
Article
Giuliano Pancaldi;
(2020)
Reframing the Sciences of the Long Eighteenth Century
(/isis/citation/CBB517793271/)
Article
Robin Findlay Hendry;
(2016)
Immanent Philosophy of X
(/isis/citation/CBB983726411/)
Article
Chimisso, Cristina;
(2000)
The Mind and the Faculties: The Controversy over “Primitive Mentality” and the Struggle for Disciplianry Space at the Inter-War Sorbonne
(/isis/citation/CBB000330516/)
Article
Michael J. Reiss;
(2020)
Science Education in the Light of COVID-19
(/isis/citation/CBB631439506/)
Article
Libby Robin;
(2022)
Soil in the air
(/isis/citation/CBB244485310/)
Article
Kaiser, David;
(2012)
In Retrospect: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
(/isis/citation/CBB001320445/)
Article
Vedran Duančić;
(2021)
Recent trends in the history of science in Croatia
(/isis/citation/CBB606157368/)
Article
Weingart, Peter;
(2012)
Minerva---50 Years Reflecting on Science in Society
(/isis/citation/CBB001211959/)
Article
Zhai, Shuting;
(2011)
The Process of the Establishment of History of Science and Technology as a First Class Discipline in China
(/isis/citation/CBB001221312/)
Article
John Parascandola;
(2022)
The Development of Medicinal Chemistry as a Disciplines: A Topic Ripe for Historical Exploration
(/isis/citation/CBB754203113/)
Article
Cameron Brinitzer;
Etienne Benson;
(2022)
Introduction: What Is a Field? Transformations in Fields, Fieldwork, and Field Sciences since the Mid-Twentieth Century
(/isis/citation/CBB865035439/)
Article
Yongjun Ma;
Yanlan Wan;
(2017)
History of Science Content Analysis of Chinese Science Textbooks from the Perspective of Acculturation
(/isis/citation/CBB668517332/)
Article
Philip Enros;
(2016)
The Origins of the Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology
(/isis/citation/CBB059851374/)
Article
Harman, Oren;
Galison, Peter;
(2008)
Epistemic Virtues and Leibnizian Dreams: On the Shifting Boundaries between Science, Humanities, and Faith
(/isis/citation/CBB001030484/)
Article
Aleksei Lokhmatov;
(2020)
Auf dem Weg zur „Einheit“: Józef Chałasiński und die Suche nach einer „erlaubten“ Genealogie der Soziologie im Nachkriegspolen (1945–1951)
(/isis/citation/CBB018534008/)
Be the first to comment!