De Risi, Vincenzo (Author)
Apeiron: Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science
Volume: 54
Issue: 2
Pages: 233-259
In this paper, I attempt a reconstruction of the theory of intersections in the geometry of Euclid. It has been well known, at least since the time of Pasch onward, that in the Elements there are no explicit principles governing the existence of the points of intersections between lines, so that in several propositions of Euclid the simple crossing of two lines (two circles, for instance) is regarded as the actual meeting of such lines, it being simply assumed that the point of their intersection exists. Such assumptions are labelled, today, as implicit claims about the continuity of the lines, or about the continuity of the underlying space. Euclid’s proofs, therefore, would seem to have some demonstrative gaps that need to be filled by a set of continuity axioms (as we do, in fact, find in modern axiomatizations). I show that Euclid’s theory of intersections was not in fact based on any notion of continuity at all. This is not only because Greek concepts of continuity (such as the Aristotelian ones) were largely insufficient to ground a geometrical theory of intersections, but also, at a deeper level, because continuity was simply not regarded as a notion that had any role to play in the latter theory. Had Euclid been asked to explain why the points of intersections of lines and circles should exist, it would have never occurred to him to mention continuity in this connection. Ancient geometry was very different from ours, and it is only our modern views on continuity that tend to give rise to the expectation that this latter must be included in the foundations of elementary mathematics. We may hope to reconstruct Euclid’s views on intersections if we undertake a critical examination both of the extension and of the limits of ancient diagrammatic practices. This is tantamount to attempting to understand to what extent the existence of an intersection point may be inferred just from the inspection of a diagram, and in which cases we need rather to supplement such inference by propositional rules. This leads us to discuss Euclid’s definition of a point, and to work out the details of the complex interaction between diagrams and text in ancient geometry. We will see, then, that Euclid may have possessed a theory of intersections that was sufficiently rigorous to dispel the main objections that could be advanced in antiquity.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Webster, Colin;
(2014)
Euclid's Optics and Geometrical Astronomy
(/isis/citation/CBB001451440/)
Book
Euclid, ;
Taisbak, Christian Marinus;
(2003)
Dedomena---Euclid's Data, or, The Importance of Being Given
(/isis/citation/CBB000301663/)
Book
Tóth, Imre;
(2010)
Fragmente und Spuren nichteuklidischer Geometrie bei Aristoteles
(/isis/citation/CBB001420976/)
Book
Suppes, Patrick;
Moravcsik, Julius M.;
Mendell, Henry;
(2000)
Ancient & Medieval Traditions in the Exact Sciences: Essays in Memory of Wilbur Knorr
(/isis/citation/CBB000101823/)
Article
Harari, Orna;
(2003)
The Concept of Existence and the Role of Constructions in Euclid's Elements
(/isis/citation/CBB000300433/)
Article
Vitrac, Bernard;
Djebbar, Ahmed;
(2012)
Le Livre XIV des Éléments d'Euclide: versions grecques et arabes (seconde partie)
(/isis/citation/CBB001252980/)
Article
Berggren, J. L.;
Brummelen, Glen van;
(2002-2003)
From Euclid to Apollonius: al-Kūhī's Lemmas to the Conics
(/isis/citation/CBB000501033/)
Article
Krol, Z.;
(2006)
Ancient Geometry and Plato's Philosophy on the Base of Pappus' “Comment on the Xth Book of Elements of Euclid”
(/isis/citation/CBB000931646/)
Article
Mueller, Ian;
(2003)
Remarks on Euclid's Elements I, 32 and the Parallel Postulate
(/isis/citation/CBB000740732/)
Book
Euclid, ;
(2001)
Euclide d'Alexandrie. Les Éléments. Traduit du texte de Heiberg, Volume 4, Livres XI-XIII: Géométrie des Solides
(/isis/citation/CBB000101225/)
Article
Aboav, David;
(2008)
Euclid's Book on Divisions of Figures: A Conjecture as to Its Origin
(/isis/citation/CBB000850606/)
Article
Krol, Z.;
(2007)
Introduction to Ancient Theories of Proportion
(/isis/citation/CBB000931652/)
Article
Vincenzo De Risi;
(2022)
Euclid’s Fourth Postulate: Its authenticity and significance for the foundations of Greek mathematics
(/isis/citation/CBB852153445/)
Article
Geymonat, Mario;
(2009)
Arithmetic and Geometry in Ancient Rome: Surveyors, Intellectuals, and Poets
(/isis/citation/CBB000933728/)
Article
Mode, ;
(2007)
A Study of the Editions of Euclid's Elements (II)
(/isis/citation/CBB000760544/)
Article
Solere, Jean-Luc;
(2003)
L'ordre axiomatique comme modèle d'écriture philosophique dans l'Antiquité et au Moyen Age
(/isis/citation/CBB000770963/)
Chapter
Vitrac, Bernard;
(2012)
The Euclidean Ideal of Proof in The Elements and Philological Uncertainties of Heiberg's Edition of the Text
(/isis/citation/CBB001320139/)
Article
Gunhan Caglayan;
(2016)
Exploring the Lunes of Hippocrates in a Dynamic Geometry Environment
(/isis/citation/CBB484034654/)
Article
Raymond, Dwayne;
(2011)
From a Particular Diagram to a Universal Result: Euclid's Elements, Book I
(/isis/citation/CBB001250013/)
Article
Saito, Ken;
(2012)
Traditions of the Diagram, Tradition of the Text: A Case Study
(/isis/citation/CBB001211476/)
Be the first to comment!