Article ID: CBB308076732

Mayr and Tinbergen: disentangling and integrating (2019)

unapi

Research on animal behavior is typically organized according to a combination of two influential frameworks: Ernst Mayr’s distinction between proximate and ultimate causes, and Niko Tinbergen’s “four questions” (mechanisms, development, survival value, and evolution). My aim is to debunk two common interpretive misconceptions about Mayr’s proximate–ultimate distinction and its relationship to Tinbergen’s four questions, and to offer a new interpretation that avoids both. The first misconception is that the proximate–ultimate distinction maps cleanly onto Tinbergen’s four questions, marking a boundary between Tinbergen’s evolutionary and survival value questions (ultimate) versus developmental and mechanistic questions (proximate). The second is that Mayr’s proximate–ultimate distinction is meant to rule out the relevance of proximate causes to evolutionary explanations. I argue that neither is plausible given the text and Mayr’s philosophical aims, namely, to argue that evolutionary biology cannot be reduced to either the physical sciences or to other areas of biology. Through a reconstruction of Mayr’s anti-reductionist argument, I develop an interpretation according to which the proximate–ultimate distinction marks two ways that teleological reasoning can be naturalistically grounded in biology, corresponding to Mayr’s distinction between teleonomic and adapted systems. Mayr distinguishes reduction, which the proximate–ultimate distinction is meant to block, from analysis, through which he allows that proximate causes, causes that are neither proximate nor ultimate, and chance can all contribute to evolutionary explanations. I conclude by suggesting some ways in which the interpretation defended here reframes our understanding of Mayr’s disagreements with some evolutionary-developmental biologists.

...More
Citation URI
http://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB308076732/

Similar Citations

Article Takacs, Peter; Ruse, Michael; (2013)
The Current Status of the Philosophy of Biology (/isis/citation/CBB001252311/) unapi

Article Ariew, André; (2003)
Ernst Mayr's “Ultimate/Proximate” Distinction Reconsidered and Reconstructed (/isis/citation/CBB000340589/) unapi

Article Sandy C. Boucher; (2021)
Biological Teleology, Reductionism, and Verbal Disputes (/isis/citation/CBB536738665/) unapi

Article Hull, David L.; (2011)
Defining Darwinism (/isis/citation/CBB001023980/) unapi

Book Dowe, Phil; Noordhof, Paul; (2004)
Cause and Chance: Causation in an Indeterministic World (/isis/citation/CBB000410585/) unapi

Book Koons, Robert C.; (2000)
Realism Regained: An Exact Theory of Causation, Teleology, and the Mind (/isis/citation/CBB000410586/) unapi

Article Short, T. L.; (2002)
Darwin's Concept of Final Cause: Neither New nor Trivial (/isis/citation/CBB000202574/) unapi

Article Aaron Wells; (2020)
Kant, Linnaeus, and the economy of nature (/isis/citation/CBB872058525/) unapi

Article Moss, Lenny; Nicholson, Daniel J.; (2012)
On Nature and Normativity: Normativity, Teleology, and Mechanism in Biological Explanation (/isis/citation/CBB001221591/) unapi

Article Alejandro Fábregas-Tejeda; Abigail Nieves Delgado; Jan Baedke; (2021)
Revisiting Hans Böker’s "Species Transformation Through Reconstruction: Reconstruction Through Active Reaction of Organisms" (1935) (/isis/citation/CBB806685409/) unapi

Article Michael Ruse; (2016)
Evolutionary biology and the question of teleology (/isis/citation/CBB878894989/) unapi

Book Godfrey-Smith, Peter; (2014)
Philosophy of Biology (/isis/citation/CBB001510277/) unapi

Article Jessica Riskin; (2020)
Biology’s mistress, a brief history (/isis/citation/CBB880456753/) unapi

Article Matthen, Mohan; (2000)
Intentionality and the Linguistic Analogy (/isis/citation/CBB000770646/) unapi

Article Glymour, Bruce; (1999)
Population Level Causation and a Unified Theory of Natural Selection (/isis/citation/CBB000111011/) unapi

Thesis Hendrikse, Jesse Love; (2006)
Explanation and Inheritance (/isis/citation/CBB001561700/) unapi

Article Birch, Jonathan; (2012)
The Negative View of Natural Selection (/isis/citation/CBB001221639/) unapi

Article Pierrick Bourrat; (2020)
Natural selection and the reference grain problem (/isis/citation/CBB530242611/) unapi

Authors & Contributors
Ruse, Michael
Glymour, Bruce
Short, T. L.
Ariew, André
Dowe, Phil
Noordhof, Paul
Journals
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences
Biology and Philosophy
Journal of Cambridge Studies
Science and Education
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
Foundations of Science
Publishers
Routledge
Oxford University Press
Princeton University Press
University of Calgary (Canada)
Concepts
Biology
Philosophy of biology
Teleology
Evolution
Causality
Evolutionary developmental biology
People
Darwin, Charles Robert
Mayr, Ernst
Aristotle
Böker, Hans
Kant, Immanuel
Linnaeus, Carolus
Time Periods
21st century
20th century
20th century, late
19th century
20th century, early
18th century
Places
Germany
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment