Article ID: CBB308070543

Authority, Autonomy and the First London Bills of Mortality (2020)

unapi

Publication of population-level data can help balance a government's need for authority with individual residents' practical need for autonomy, even during the chaos and urgency of an epidemic. Starting in the early 16th century, efforts to track the spread of epidemic plague across England and Wales included royal orders to compile weekly, parish-by-parish mortality reports. The City of London devised a novel, quantitative response: rather than producing lists of plague victims, its parishes counted up those who had died of plague and the total number buried that week to yield a local relative frequency of plague deaths. Initially, in keeping with common practices, these data were available only to London's Lord Mayor and aldermen, the sovereign, and the Privy Council. But during the plague of 1592, the City of London's printer posted large-format printed versions of each week's report in public places throughout the City, thus providing free, general access to the week's mortality data. These were the first London Bills of Mortality. Thanks to London's high numeracy rate, many residents could not only read numbers but use tables and interpret ratios. Even those with minimal numeracy could participate in discussions of the data and integrate the results into their lived experience, potentially assessing risks more accurately and making better choices. The fundamental concerns faced by London's government and residents in the 16th century are remarkably similar to those now raised by COVID-19. The broad requirements for and potential advantages of sharing a stream of useful, reliable statistical data with a numerate public also run in parallel.

...More
Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB308070543/

Similar Citations

Article Jenner, Mark S. R.; (2012)
Plague on a Page: Lord Have Mercy Upon Us in Early Modern London (/isis/citation/CBB001200522/)

Article Margaret Pelling; (2020)
'Bosom Vipers': Endemic Versus Epidemic Disease (/isis/citation/CBB218133605/)

Article Neil Cummins; Morgan Kelly; Cormac Ó Gráda; (2016)
Living standards and plague in London, 1560–1665 (/isis/citation/CBB156415011/)

Article Giuseppe Armocida; (2020)
Di nuovo una storia vecchia. L’emergenza Coronavirus (/isis/citation/CBB710967498/)

Article Luisa Simonutti; (2020)
Paure, contaminazioni e alterità. Da Bacone a Kapuściński (/isis/citation/CBB346421875/)

Article Stefano Santasilia; (2020)
Pandemia e stili di vita: pazienza (/isis/citation/CBB845461986/)

Article Luisa Simonutti; (2020)
Uneasiness. John Locke e le inquietudini del presente (/isis/citation/CBB647837757/)

Book Fernando Rosa; Alessandra Parodi; (2024)
Essere in una pandemia. Filosofia, medicina e Covid-19 (/isis/citation/CBB335674855/)

Book Slavoj Žižek; (2021)
Pandemic! 2 : Chronicles of a Time Lost (/isis/citation/CBB693021571/)

Article M. Cristina Amoretti; Elisabetta Lalumera; (2021)
Non-epistemic factors in epidemiological models. The case of mortality data (/isis/citation/CBB546389082/)

Article Davide Orsini; James A. Ostenson; Francesco Brigo; Mariano Martini; (2023)
Pandemics and Mental Disorders: From the Thought of the 19th Century Psychiatrist Andrea Verga to long-term effects of COVID-19 (/isis/citation/CBB934514442/)

Article Florence Bretelle‐Establet; (2020)
Science, Demons, and Gods in the Battle Against the COVID-19 Epidemic (/isis/citation/CBB540072063/)

Book Slavoj Žižek; (2020)
Pandemic!: COVID-19 shakes the world (/isis/citation/CBB503139865/)

Article Michael P. Kelly; Federica Russo; (2021)
The epistemic values at the basis of epidemiology and public health (/isis/citation/CBB856188518/)

Article Paul Richards; (2020)
Ebola and COVID-19 in Sierra Leone: comparative lessons of epidemics for society (/isis/citation/CBB007996257/)

Article Omar Larentis; (2022)
Green Pass versus Health Faiths. To travel in confidence with public health (/isis/citation/CBB964081476/)

Book Ruth MacKay; (2019)
Life in a Time of Pestilence: The Great Castilian Plague of 1596–1601 (/isis/citation/CBB865594602/)

Authors & Contributors
Zizek, Slavoj
Simonutti, Luisa
Fernando Rosa
M. Cristina Amoretti
MacKay, Ruth
Brigo, Francesco
Concepts
Epidemics
Medicine and society
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
Public health
Pandemics
Medicine
Time Periods
21st century
16th century
17th century
Early modern
19th century
20th century, late
Places
England
London (England)
Great Britain
Sierra Leone
Wales
Spain
Institutions
World Health Organization (WHO)
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment