Rhodri Ivor Leng (Author)
Gareth Leng (Author)
MIT Press
Physical Details: 376
Language: English
Modern science is built on experimental evidence, yet scientists are often very selective in deciding what evidence to use and tend to disagree about how to interpret it. In The Matter of Facts, Gareth and Rhodri Leng explore how scientists produce and use evidence. They do so to contextualize an array of problems confronting modern science that have raised concerns about its reliability: the widespread use of inappropriate statistical tests, a shortage of replication studies, and a bias in both publishing and citing “positive” results. Before these problems can be addressed meaningfully, the authors argue, we must understand what makes science work and what leads it astray. The myth of science is that scientists constantly challenge their own thinking. But in reality, all scientists are in the business of persuading other scientists of the importance of their own ideas, and they do so by combining reason with rhetoric. Often, they look for evidence that will support their ideas, not for evidence that might contradict them; often, they present evidence in a way that makes it appear to be supportive; and often, they ignore inconvenient evidence. In a series of essays focusing on controversies, disputes, and discoveries, the authors vividly portray science as a human activity, driven by passion as well as by reason. By analyzing the fluidity of scientific concepts and the dynamic and unpredictable development of scientific fields, the authors paint a picture of modern science and the pressures it faces.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Book
Sarah Ehlers;
Stefan Esselborn;
(2022)
Evidence in Action between Science and Society: Constructing, Validating, and Contesting Knowledge
(/isis/citation/CBB104485678/)
Book
Lessl, Thomas M.;
(2012)
Rhetorical Darwinism: Religion, Evolution, and the Scientific Identity
(/isis/citation/CBB001251137/)
Article
Mary S. Morgan;
(2019)
Exemplification and the use-values of cases and case studies
(/isis/citation/CBB151505081/)
Article
Labinger, Jay A.;
Weininger, Stephen J.;
(2005)
Controversy in Chemistry: How Do You Prove a Negative? The Cases of Phlogiston and Cold Fusion
(/isis/citation/CBB001032168/)
Article
Peter Achinstein;
(2023)
Disregarding evidence: Reasonable options for Newton and Rutherford?
(/isis/citation/CBB649526523/)
Article
Emily C. Parke;
Anya Plutynski;
(2023)
Going big by going small: Trade-offs in microbiome explanations of cancer
(/isis/citation/CBB507629958/)
Article
Philip Choi;
(2019)
Reliabilism, Scepticism, and Evidentia in Ockham
(/isis/citation/CBB479527035/)
Article
H. Otto Sibum;
(2020)
When is enough enough? Accurate measurement and the integrity of scientific research
(/isis/citation/CBB773125013/)
Article
Karen Kovaka;
(2021)
Evaluating Community Science
(/isis/citation/CBB988749229/)
Article
Marc Ereshefsky;
Derek Turner;
(2020)
Historicity and Explanation
(/isis/citation/CBB387449918/)
Article
Mikkel Gerken;
(2020)
Public scientific testimony in the scientific image
(/isis/citation/CBB736945756/)
Book
Gil Eyal;
(2019)
The Crisis of Expertise
(/isis/citation/CBB193528078/)
Thesis
David Merritt Johns;
(2019)
Good Evidence, Bad Evidence: Science, Ethics, and the Politics of Making and Unmaking Public Health Policies
(/isis/citation/CBB199543025/)
Book
Susan Wells;
(2019)
Robert Burton’s Rhetoric: An Anatomy of Early Modern Knowledge
(/isis/citation/CBB011654301/)
Article
Olivier Dubouclez;
(2016)
L’« ordre géométrique » et le dispositif argumentatif des Méditations métaphysiques de René Descartes
(/isis/citation/CBB010094505/)
Article
Stefano Furlan;
Rocco Gaudenzi;
(2022)
The earth vibrates with analogies: The Dirac sea and the geology of the vacuum
(/isis/citation/CBB840401446/)
Thesis
Robidoux, Charlotte A.;
(2008)
Human Genome Project Discoveries: Dialectics and Rhetoric in the Science of Genetics
(/isis/citation/CBB001560761/)
Book
Colleen Derkatch;
(2016)
Bounding Biomedicine: Evidence and Rhetoric in the New Science of Alternative Medicine
(/isis/citation/CBB739944455/)
Article
Frank Cabrera;
(2020)
Evidence and Explanation in Cicero's On Divination
(/isis/citation/CBB028919561/)
Book
Kevin C. Elliott;
Ted Richards;
(2017)
Exploring Inductive Risk: Case Studies of Values in Science
(/isis/citation/CBB115450433/)
Be the first to comment!