Science and technology studies (STS) has long studied scientific controversies as a way to identify prospects for technical democracy. Contemporary STS tends to prioritize ‘overflowing’ controversies, where lay actors challenge experts’ technical frameworks by explicating the broader implications and so open up technological issues. Yet many controversies are not like this; they operate on a largely technical register within official procedures, so the broader implications remain implicit. In the case of Swedish nuclear waste management a major controversy did not overflow and so presents an opportunity to elaborate theoretically on such ‘inert’ controversies. Crucial insights can come from Andrew Feenberg’s critical constructivism – an alloy of STS and the Frankfurt School. It can help explain why some controversies remain inert and what is at stake there, regardless of the actors’ actions and statements. To make these contributions, critical constructivism needs to emphasize its critical heritage. As with many contemporary studies in STS, critical constructivism has increasingly come to study how change happens, at the expense of how the status quo is maintained. Through the STS idea of ‘structural closure’ – how controversies can be closed by hegemonic structures – inert controversies can be addressed by critical constructivism, thus enriching the study of controversies in STS.
...More
Article
Rosa Nan Leunbach;
Kristian H. Nielsen;
(2019)
Exploring the Dialogical Space of Hybrid Forums: The “Predictably Unpredictable” Case of Radioactive Waste Management in Denmark, 2003-2018
Article
Monamie Bhadra Haines;
(February 2019)
Contested credibility economies of nuclear power in India
Article
Irwin, Alan;
Jensen, Torben Elgaard;
Jones, Kevin E.;
(February 2013)
The good, the bad and the perfect: Criticizing engagement practice
Article
Durant, Darrin;
(October 2011)
Models of democracy in social studies of science
Article
Marika Hietala;
(2021)
Safer-than: Making Nuclear Waste Disposal More Familiar
Article
MacFarlane, Allison;
(2003)
Underlying Yucca Mountain: The Interplay of Geology and Policy in Nuclear Waste Disposal
Article
Andrea Candela;
(2017)
Sorting Out Nuclear Concerns: The Australian Uranium Debate From Jervis Bay to Ringwood's Synroc
Book
McCutcheon, Charles;
(2002)
Nuclear Reactions: The Politics of Opening a Radioactive Waste Disposal Site
Chapter
Hideyuki Hirakawa;
(2015)
Rhetorical Marginalization of Science and Democracy: Politics in Risk Discourse on Radioactive Risks in Japan
Article
Kristina Söderholm;
Roine Wiklund;
(2009)
Infrastructural Systems and Technical Change: Learning from the Establishment of a Water- and Wastewater System and the Electrification of a Railway Line in a Nordic Climate at the Turn of the 19th Century
Article
Bijker, W. E.;
(2004)
Sustainable policy? A public debate about nature development in the Netherlands
Article
Yannick Barthe;
Mark Elam;
Göran Sundqvist;
(2020)
Technological Fix or Divisible Object of Collective Concern? Histories of Conflict over the Geological Disposal of Nuclear Waste in Sweden and France
Article
Kathrin Eitel;
(2021)
Oozing Matters: Infracycles of 'Waste Management' and Emergent Naturecultures in Phnom Penh
Article
Sebastián Carenzo;
(2020)
Contesting informality through innovation “from below”: Epistemic and political challenges in a waste pickers cooperative from Buenos Aires (Argentina)
Article
François-Joseph Daniel;
(2023)
Industrializing Bacterial Work: Microbiopolitics, Biogas Alchemy, and the French Waste Management Sector
Article
Amy Zhang;
(2025)
Spectacular Technology, Invisible Harms: Witnessing Techno-science on Waste Tours in China
Article
Widmalm, Sven;
(2014)
United in Separation: The Inventions of Gel Filtration and the Moral Economy of Research in Swedish Biochemistry, ca. 1950--1970
Article
Andrea Candela;
(2024)
‘The Nuclear Siting Controversy’ in 1970s Italy: Historical Perspectives on Geology, Nuclear Power and Radioactive Waste
Article
Hamblin, Jacob Darwin;
Linda M. Richards;
(2015)
Beyond the Lucky Dragon: Japanese Scientists and Fallout Discourse in the 1950s
Thesis
Jolly, J. Christopher;
(2004)
Thresholds of Uncertainty: Radiation and Responsibility in the Fallout Controversy
Be the first to comment!