IsisCB Explore

Article ID: CBB283183739

Swedish nuclear waste management as an inert controversy: Using critical constructivism to understand cold technological conflict (2023)

Lagerlöf, Hannes (Author)

Science as Culture
Volume: 32
Issue: 4
Pages: 558-582

URI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2023.2218415

DOI: 10.1080/09505431.2023.2218415

Outside Links

WorldCat

Google Scholar

JSTOR

Academia.edu

Social construction; constructivism Nuclear and radioactive waste Waste disposal Democracy Controversies and disputes Science and technology studies (STS) Sweden

Science and technology studies (STS) has long studied scientific controversies as a way to identify prospects for technical democracy. Contemporary STS tends to prioritize ‘overflowing’ controversies, where lay actors challenge experts’ technical frameworks by explicating the broader implications and so open up technological issues. Yet many controversies are not like this; they operate on a largely technical register within official procedures, so the broader implications remain implicit. In the case of Swedish nuclear waste management a major controversy did not overflow and so presents an opportunity to elaborate theoretically on such ‘inert’ controversies. Crucial insights can come from Andrew Feenberg’s critical constructivism – an alloy of STS and the Frankfurt School. It can help explain why some controversies remain inert and what is at stake there, regardless of the actors’ actions and statements. To make these contributions, critical constructivism needs to emphasize its critical heritage. As with many contemporary studies in STS, critical constructivism has increasingly come to study how change happens, at the expense of how the status quo is maintained. Through the STS idea of ‘structural closure’ – how controversies can be closed by hegemonic structures – inert controversies can be addressed by critical constructivism, thus enriching the study of controversies in STS.

...More

Citation URI

https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB283183739/

Citations Indexes

Similar Citations

Article Rosa Nan Leunbach; Kristian H. Nielsen; (2019)
Exploring the Dialogical Space of Hybrid Forums: The “Predictably Unpredictable” Case of Radioactive Waste Management in Denmark, 2003-2018 (/isis/citation/CBB878608684/)

Article Monamie Bhadra Haines; (February 2019)
Contested credibility economies of nuclear power in India (/isis/citation/CBB710438620/)

Article Irwin, Alan; Jensen, Torben Elgaard; Jones, Kevin E.; (February 2013)
The good, the bad and the perfect: Criticizing engagement practice (/isis/citation/CBB809766452/)

Article Durant, Darrin; (October 2011)
Models of democracy in social studies of science (/isis/citation/CBB562394056/)

Article Marika Hietala; (2021)
Safer-than: Making Nuclear Waste Disposal More Familiar (/isis/citation/CBB181460049/)

Article MacFarlane, Allison; (2003)
Underlying Yucca Mountain: The Interplay of Geology and Policy in Nuclear Waste Disposal (/isis/citation/CBB000651057/)

Article Andrea Candela; (2017)
Sorting Out Nuclear Concerns: The Australian Uranium Debate From Jervis Bay to Ringwood's Synroc (/isis/citation/CBB414955330/)

Book McCutcheon, Charles; (2002)
Nuclear Reactions: The Politics of Opening a Radioactive Waste Disposal Site (/isis/citation/CBB000301968/)

Chapter Hideyuki Hirakawa; (2015)
Rhetorical Marginalization of Science and Democracy: Politics in Risk Discourse on Radioactive Risks in Japan (/isis/citation/CBB709908260/)

Article Kristina Söderholm; Roine Wiklund; (2009)
Infrastructural Systems and Technical Change: Learning from the Establishment of a Water- and Wastewater System and the Electrification of a Railway Line in a Nordic Climate at the Turn of the 19th Century (/isis/citation/CBB191956462/)

Article Yannick Barthe; Mark Elam; Göran Sundqvist; (2020)
Technological Fix or Divisible Object of Collective Concern? Histories of Conflict over the Geological Disposal of Nuclear Waste in Sweden and France (/isis/citation/CBB382470203/)

Article Bijker, W. E.; (2004)
Sustainable policy? A public debate about nature development in the Netherlands (/isis/citation/CBB001181545/)

Article Kathrin Eitel; (2021)
Oozing Matters: Infracycles of 'Waste Management' and Emergent Naturecultures in Phnom Penh (/isis/citation/CBB873226342/)

Article Sebastián Carenzo; (2020)
Contesting informality through innovation “from below”: Epistemic and political challenges in a waste pickers cooperative from Buenos Aires (Argentina) (/isis/citation/CBB660683291/)

Article Widmalm, Sven; (2014)
United in Separation: The Inventions of Gel Filtration and the Moral Economy of Research in Swedish Biochemistry, ca. 1950--1970 (/isis/citation/CBB001420409/)

Article Clarissa Ai Ling Lee; (2023)
Managing ‘Wicked’ Technoscientific Problems: The Postnormal Science of Risk Narratives (/isis/citation/CBB747521102/)

Article Seungmi Chung; Kun Hee Kim; Yeseul Park; Hyomin Kim; (2021)
A Site of Bounded Imaginaries: Local Narratives of Buan after Protests against a Nuclear Waste Repository (/isis/citation/CBB959012966/)

Article Vincent Ialenti; (June 2021)
Drum breach: Operational temporalities, error politics and WIPP’s kitty litter nuclear waste accident (/isis/citation/CBB071677242/)

Article Andrea Candela; (2024)
‘The Nuclear Siting Controversy’ in 1970s Italy: Historical Perspectives on Geology, Nuclear Power and Radioactive Waste (/isis/citation/CBB964498450/)

Article Hamblin, Jacob Darwin; Linda M. Richards; (2015)
Beyond the Lucky Dragon: Japanese Scientists and Fallout Discourse in the 1950s (/isis/citation/CBB661347126/)

Comments

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}