Jamie Milton Freestone (Author)
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
Volume: 90
Pages: 68-76
The most public-facing forms of contemporary Darwinism happily promote its worldview ambitions. Popular works, by the likes of Richard Dawkins, deflect associations with eugenics and social Darwinism, but also extend the reach of Darwinism beyond biology into social policy, politics, and ethics. Critics of the enterprise fall into two categories. Advocates of Intelligent Design and secular philosophers (like Mary Midgley and Thomas Nagel) recognise it as a worldview and argue against its implications. Scholars in the rhetoric of science or science communication, however, typically take the view that Darwinism isn't a worldview, but a scientific theory, which has been improperly embellished by some; they uphold the distinction between is and ought and argue that science is restricted to the former. This prompts an is–ought problem on another level. I catalogue the ways in which Darwinism plainly is a worldview and why commentators' beliefs that it ought not to be distorts their analysis. Hence, it is their own worldview that precludes them from accepting Darwinism's worldview implications.
...MoreArticle Ian Hesketh; Ruth Barton; Evelleen Richards (2024) Down under Darwin: Australasian perspectives on Darwin Studies. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (pp. 69-76).
Similar Citations
Article
Marco Mazzeo;
(2013)
Gli errori di Darwin? Evoluzione e storia naturale
Book
William H. Tucker;
(2024)
'The Bell Curve' in Perspective: Race, Meritocracy, Inequality and Politics
Article
Preece, Rod;
(2003)
Darwinism, Christianity, and the Great Vivisection Debate
Chapter
Evandro Agazzi;
(2016)
Il valore culturale della scienza
Article
Davide Battisti;
(2019)
Genome editing: slipping down toward Eugenics?
Article
Glick, Thomas F.;
(2009)
All Over But the Shouting: Darwin, Freud, and Einstein in Spain, 1868--1950
Article
Depew, David J.;
(2010)
Darwinian Controversies: An Historiographical Recounting
Chapter
Paul, Diane B.;
(2003)
Darwin, social Darwinism and eugenics
Article
Porter, Dorothy;
(2012)
Darwinian Disease Archaeology: Genomic Variants and the Eugenic Debate
Article
Almeida, Carla;
DalCol, Franciane Lovati;
Massarani, Luisa;
(2013)
Controvérsia científica no telejornalismo brasileiro: um estudo sobre a cobertura das células-tronco no Jornal Nacional
Book
Joel B. Hagen;
(2021)
Life Out of Balance: Homeostasis and Adaptation in a Darwinian World
Book
Adam Briggle;
Mitcham, Carl;
(2012)
Ethics and Science: An Introduction
Article
Hull, David L.;
(2011)
Defining Darwinism
Article
Maya J. Goldenberg;
(2016)
Public Misunderstanding of Science?: Reframing the Problem of Vaccine Hesitancy
Article
Peter Busch Nicolaisen;
(2022)
A State of Emergency or Business as Usual in Climate Science Communication? A Three-Dimensional Perspective on the Role Perceptions of Climate Scientists, Climate Journalists, and Citizens
Article
Alissa Cordner;
(November 2015)
Strategic Science Translation and Environmental Controversies
Article
Juliet Roper;
Shiv Ganesh;
Theodore E. Zorn;
(December 2016)
Doubt, Delay, and Discourse: Skeptics’ Strategies to Politicize Climate Change
Article
Inez Z. Ponce de Leon;
Pamela A. Custodio;
Clarissa David;
(2019)
Depicting Science in a Public Debate: The Philippine Legal Challenge Against GMO Eggplant
Book
Sebastiano Serafini;
(2019)
La bioetica in Italia: da una storia di battaglie etico-politiche a spiragli di dialogo tra pensiero cattolico e pensiero laico
Article
Renaud Debailly;
(2023)
Challenging science's autonomy: the "critique des sciences" in France
Be the first to comment!