Jamie Milton Freestone (Author)
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
Volume: 90
Pages: 68-76
The most public-facing forms of contemporary Darwinism happily promote its worldview ambitions. Popular works, by the likes of Richard Dawkins, deflect associations with eugenics and social Darwinism, but also extend the reach of Darwinism beyond biology into social policy, politics, and ethics. Critics of the enterprise fall into two categories. Advocates of Intelligent Design and secular philosophers (like Mary Midgley and Thomas Nagel) recognise it as a worldview and argue against its implications. Scholars in the rhetoric of science or science communication, however, typically take the view that Darwinism isn't a worldview, but a scientific theory, which has been improperly embellished by some; they uphold the distinction between is and ought and argue that science is restricted to the former. This prompts an is–ought problem on another level. I catalogue the ways in which Darwinism plainly is a worldview and why commentators' beliefs that it ought not to be distorts their analysis. Hence, it is their own worldview that precludes them from accepting Darwinism's worldview implications.
...MoreArticle Ian Hesketh; Ruth Barton; Evelleen Richards (2024) Down under Darwin: Australasian perspectives on Darwin Studies. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (pp. 69-76).
Similar Citations
Article
Marco Mazzeo;
(2013)
Gli errori di Darwin? Evoluzione e storia naturale
(/isis/citation/CBB744523130/)
Book
William H. Tucker;
(2024)
'The Bell Curve' in Perspective: Race, Meritocracy, Inequality and Politics
(/isis/citation/CBB901059092/)
Article
Preece, Rod;
(2003)
Darwinism, Christianity, and the Great Vivisection Debate
(/isis/citation/CBB000774479/)
Chapter
Evandro Agazzi;
(2016)
Il valore culturale della scienza
(/isis/citation/CBB882918228/)
Article
Davide Battisti;
(2019)
Genome editing: slipping down toward Eugenics?
(/isis/citation/CBB945724739/)
Article
Glick, Thomas F.;
(2009)
All Over But the Shouting: Darwin, Freud, and Einstein in Spain, 1868--1950
(/isis/citation/CBB001023373/)
Article
Depew, David J.;
(2010)
Darwinian Controversies: An Historiographical Recounting
(/isis/citation/CBB001032812/)
Chapter
Paul, Diane B.;
(2003)
Darwin, social Darwinism and eugenics
(/isis/citation/CBB000359563/)
Article
Porter, Dorothy;
(2012)
Darwinian Disease Archaeology: Genomic Variants and the Eugenic Debate
(/isis/citation/CBB001211123/)
Article
Almeida, Carla;
DalCol, Franciane Lovati;
Massarani, Luisa;
(2013)
Controvérsia científica no telejornalismo brasileiro: um estudo sobre a cobertura das células-tronco no Jornal Nacional
(/isis/citation/CBB001420697/)
Book
Joel B. Hagen;
(2021)
Life Out of Balance: Homeostasis and Adaptation in a Darwinian World
(/isis/citation/CBB148836828/)
Article
Maya J. Goldenberg;
(2016)
Public Misunderstanding of Science?: Reframing the Problem of Vaccine Hesitancy
(/isis/citation/CBB806878710/)
Book
Adam Briggle;
Mitcham, Carl;
(2012)
Ethics and Science: An Introduction
(/isis/citation/CBB984359009/)
Article
Hull, David L.;
(2011)
Defining Darwinism
(/isis/citation/CBB001023980/)
Article
Alissa Cordner;
(November 2015)
Strategic Science Translation and Environmental Controversies
(/isis/citation/CBB568462630/)
Article
Juliet Roper;
Shiv Ganesh;
Theodore E. Zorn;
(December 2016)
Doubt, Delay, and Discourse: Skeptics’ Strategies to Politicize Climate Change
(/isis/citation/CBB924400687/)
Book
Sebastiano Serafini;
(2019)
La bioetica in Italia: da una storia di battaglie etico-politiche a spiragli di dialogo tra pensiero cattolico e pensiero laico
(/isis/citation/CBB039016702/)
Article
Djerf-Pierre, Monika;
(2013)
Green Metacycles of Attention: Reassessing the Attention Cycles of Environmental News Reporting 1961--2010
(/isis/citation/CBB001320413/)
Article
Pierandrea Lo Nostro;
(2022)
To Print or Not to Print? Preprints and Publication: How the Covid-19 Pandemic Affected the Quality of Scientific Production
(/isis/citation/CBB191535930/)
Article
James Owen Weatherall;
Cailin O’Connor;
Justin P. Bruner;
(2020)
How to Beat Science and Influence People: Policymakers and Propaganda in Epistemic Networks
(/isis/citation/CBB187785214/)
Be the first to comment!