Bordoni, Stefano (Author)
In the late nineteenth century, Joseph John Thomson moved away from Maxwell’s specific theoretical models of matter and energy, even though he continued to rely on the general framework of Maxwell’s electromagnetic theory. In his 1893 book, he accomplished the conceptual drift towards a discrete model for matter, electricity, and fields. In Thomson’s model, energy was linked to tubes of force, in particular to the aether contained in them and surrounding them: the energy was the kinetic energy of aether, of both a rotational and translational kind. Starting from Maxwell’s electromagnetic fields, namely stresses propagating through a continuous solid medium, Thomson arrived at a representation of fields as a sea of discrete units carrying energy and momentum. He tried to transform Maxwell’s theory into a unified picture in which atomic models of matter stood beside atomic models of fields. In 1904 his interpretation of X-rays was based on the integration between two complementary features of electromagnetic radiation, the continuity and the discreteness, and on some kind of fibrous aether. In recent secondary literature, the problematic conceptual link between J. J. Thomson’s theory and contemporary theories on electromagnetic radiation has been underestimated. On the contrary, in the first half of the twentieth century, some physicists inquired into that link, and a widespread debate emerged, misunderstandings included.
...More
Article
Bordoni, Stefano;
(2011)
Beyond Electromagnetic and Mechanical World-Views: J. Larmor's Models of Matter and Energy in the Early 1890s
(/isis/citation/CBB001022981/)
Article
Navarro, Jaume;
(2005)
J. J. Thomson on the Nature of Matter: Corpuscles and the Continuum
(/isis/citation/CBB000651417/)
Article
John Lekner;
(2017)
Nurturing Genius: the Childhood and Youth of Kelvin and Maxwell
(/isis/citation/CBB613473636/)
Chapter
Stefano Bordoni;
(2009)
Discrete Models for Electromagnetic Radiation: J.J. Thomson and Einstein
(/isis/citation/CBB519434910/)
Chapter
Olivier Darrigol;
(2016)
Models, Structure and the Generality in Clerk Maxwell's Theory of Electromagnetism
(/isis/citation/CBB362794108/)
Article
Alisa Bokulich;
(2015)
Maxwell, Helmholtz, and the Unreasonable Effectiveness of the Method of Physical Analogy
(/isis/citation/CBB591442121/)
Book
Simpson, Thomas K.;
(2006)
Figures of Thought: A Literary Appreciation of Maxwell's Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism
(/isis/citation/CBB000740227/)
Article
Hou, Yude;
(2004)
Didn't (Maxwell) Prophesy the Existence of Electromagnetic Wave?
(/isis/citation/CBB000502057/)
Article
Silva, Cibelle Celestino;
(2007)
The Role of Models and Analogies in the Electromagnetic Theory: A Historical Case Study
(/isis/citation/CBB001032896/)
Article
Vera Hartenstein;
Mario Hubert;
(2021)
When Fields Are Not Degrees of Freedom
(/isis/citation/CBB322806876/)
Book
Giuseppe Pelosi;
Stefano Selleri;
(2023)
The Roots of Maxwell's A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field: Scotland and Tuscany, 'twinned by science'
(/isis/citation/CBB905350616/)
Article
Chalmers, Alan;
(2001)
Maxwell, Mechanism, and the Nature of Electricity
(/isis/citation/CBB000102533/)
Article
Daniel Jon Mitchell;
(2017)
What's Nu? A Re-Examination of Maxwell's ‘Ratio-of-Units’ Argument, from the Mechanical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field to ‘On the Elementary Relations Between Electrical Measurements’
(/isis/citation/CBB497643147/)
Book
Bruce J. Hunt;
(2021)
Imperial Science: Cable Telegraphy and Electrical Physics in the Victorian British Empire
(/isis/citation/CBB544275565/)
Thesis
Cameron Lazaroff-Puck;
(2021)
What Theories Are Made Of: How Industry and Culture Shaped Maxwell's Theories of Electromagnetism
(/isis/citation/CBB411319578/)
Chapter
Donatella Marmottini;
Raffaele Pisano;
(2017)
Nature-of-Science Teaching: notes on the Lagrangian Methods in Maxwell’s Electromagnetic Theory
(/isis/citation/CBB808838171/)
Article
Brenni, Paolo;
(2004)
Mechanical and Hydraulic Models for Illustrating Electromagnetic Phenomena
(/isis/citation/CBB000770307/)
Article
Stanley, Matthew;
(2012)
By Design: James Clerk Maxwell and the Evangelical Unification of Science
(/isis/citation/CBB001231540/)
Article
Francesco Nappo;
(2021)
The double nature of Maxwell's physical analogies
(/isis/citation/CBB554615043/)
Article
D'Agostino, Salvo;
(2000)
On the difficulties of the transition from Maxwell's and Hertz's pure-field theories to Lorentz's electron
(/isis/citation/CBB000110635/)
Be the first to comment!