Tyler D. P. Brunet (Author)
W. Ford Doolittle (Author)
Joseph P. Bielawski (Author)
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
Volume: 87
Pages: 125-135
Fitness contribution alone should not be the criterion of ‘function’ in molecular biology and genomics. Disagreement over the use of ‘function’ in molecular biology and genomics is still with us, almost eight years after publicity surrounding the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements project claimed that 80.4% of the human genome comprises “functional elements”. Recent approaches attempt to resolve or reformulate this debate by redefining genomic ‘function’ in terms of current fitness contribution. In its favour, this redefinition for the genomic context is in apparent conformity with predominant experimental practices, especially in biomedical research, and with ascription of function by selective maintenance. We argue against approaches of this kind, however, on the grounds that they could be seen as non-Darwinian, and fail to properly account for the diversity of non-adaptive processes involved in the origin and maintenance of genomic complexity. We examine cases of molecular and organismal complexity that arise neutrally, showing how purifying selection maintains non-adaptive genomic complexity. Rather than lumping different sorts of genomic complexity together by defining ‘function’ as fitness contribution, we argue that it is best to separate the heterogeneous contributions of preaptation, exaptation and adaptation to the historical processes of origin and maintenance for complex features.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Zdenka Brzović;
Predrag Šustar;
(2020)
Postgenomics function monism
(/isis/citation/CBB311069000/)
Article
Jonathan Birch;
(2019)
Inclusive fitness as a criterion for improvement
(/isis/citation/CBB535828538/)
Article
Aaron Wells;
(2020)
Kant, Linnaeus, and the economy of nature
(/isis/citation/CBB872058525/)
Article
Brian McLoone;
(2020)
Population and organismal perspectives on trait origins
(/isis/citation/CBB139456486/)
Essay Review
Schlosser, Gerhard;
(2003)
Naturalizing Functions: Unity beyond Pluralism?
(/isis/citation/CBB001566903/)
Article
Wouters, Arno G.;
(2003)
Four Notions of Biological Function
(/isis/citation/CBB000340829/)
Article
Gregor P. Greslehner;
(2020)
Not by structures alone: Can the immune system recognize microbial functions?
(/isis/citation/CBB290841407/)
Book
Gayon, Jean;
de Ricqlès, Armand;
(2010)
Les fonctions: des organismes aux artifacts
(/isis/citation/CBB001023153/)
Article
Ulrich Krohs;
(2015)
Can functionality in evolving networks be explained reductively?
(/isis/citation/CBB052973474/)
Article
James DiFrisco;
(2017)
Functional explanation and the problem of functional equivalence
(/isis/citation/CBB378954890/)
Book
McLaughlin, Peter;
(2001)
What Functions Explain: Functional Explanation and Self-Reproducing Systems
(/isis/citation/CBB000502485/)
Article
Sandy C. Boucher;
(2021)
Biological Teleology, Reductionism, and Verbal Disputes
(/isis/citation/CBB536738665/)
Book
Justin Garson;
(2019)
What Biological Functions Are and Why They Matter
(/isis/citation/CBB516539310/)
Article
Amundson, Ron;
(2000)
Against Normal Function
(/isis/citation/CBB000770644/)
Article
Karina Alleva;
José Díez;
Lucia Federico;
(2017)
Models, theory structure and mechanisms in biochemistry: The case of allosterism
(/isis/citation/CBB541545262/)
Article
Maund, Barry;
(2000)
Proper Functions and Aristotelian Functions in Biology
(/isis/citation/CBB000770650/)
Article
Ratcliffe, Matthew;
(2000)
The Function of Function
(/isis/citation/CBB000770648/)
Article
Philippe Huneman;
(2019)
Revisiting Darwinian teleology: A case for inclusive fitness as design explanation
(/isis/citation/CBB392966411/)
Article
Oliver M. Lean;
(2019)
Chemical arbitrariness and the causal role of molecular adapters
(/isis/citation/CBB162430966/)
Article
Kathryn Maxson Jones;
Rachel A. Ankeny;
Robert Cook-Deegan;
(2018)
The Bermuda Triangle: The Pragmatics, Policies, and Principles for Data Sharing in the History of the Human Genome Project
(/isis/citation/CBB445174130/)
Be the first to comment!