This paper addresses philosophical issues concerning whether mental disorders are natural kinds and how the DSM should classify mental disorders. I argue that some mental disorders (e.g. schizophrenia, depression) are natural kinds in the sense that they are natural classes constituted by a set of stable biological mechanisms. I subsequently argue that a theoretical and causal approach to classification would provide a method for classifying natural kinds that is superior to the purely descriptive approach adopted by the DSM since DSM-III. My argument suggests that the DSM should classify natural kinds in order to provide predictively useful (i.e. projectable) diagnostic categories and that a causal approach to classification would provide a more promising method for formulating valid diagnostic categories.
...More
Article
Rachel Cooper;
(2018)
Understanding the DSM-5: Stasis and Change
(/isis/citation/CBB641094844/)
Article
M. Cristina Amoretti;
Elisabetta Lalumera;
Davide Serpico;
(2021)
The DSM-5 introduction of the Social (Pragmatic) Communication Disorder as a new mental disorder: A philosophical review
(/isis/citation/CBB881537603/)
Article
Aragona, Massimiliano;
(2013)
Neopositivism and the DSM Psychiatric Classification. An Epistemological History. Part 1: Theoretical Comparison
(/isis/citation/CBB001320328/)
Article
Mauricio V Daker;
(2019)
The theory of symptom complexes, mind and madness
(/isis/citation/CBB264539507/)
Article
Hane Htut Maung;
(2016)
Diagnosis and causal explanation in psychiatry
(/isis/citation/CBB953313116/)
Article
Rachel Cooper;
(2015)
Why is the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders so hard to revise? Path-dependence and “lock-in” in classification
(/isis/citation/CBB648630739/)
Article
Godderis, Rebecca;
(2013)
A Tricky Object to Classify: Evidence, Postpartum Depression and the DSM-IV
(/isis/citation/CBB001320226/)
Article
Rachel Cooper;
Roger Blashfield;
(2018)
The myth of Hempel and the DSM-III
(/isis/citation/CBB266784900/)
Article
Aragona, Massimiliano;
(2013)
Neopositivism and the DSM Psychiatric Classification. An Epistemological History. Part 2: Historical Pathways, Epistemological Developments and Present-Day Needs
(/isis/citation/CBB001214389/)
Book
Steeves Demazeux;
Patrick Singy;
(2015)
The DSM-5 in Perspective: Philosophical Reflections on the Psychiatric Babel
(/isis/citation/CBB677264705/)
Article
Annemarie Jutel;
(2021)
Uncertainty and the inconvenient facts of diagnosis
(/isis/citation/CBB249581784/)
Book
Edward Shorter;
Max Fink;
(2018)
The Madness of Fear: A History of Catatonia
(/isis/citation/CBB544899834/)
Article
Åsa Jansson;
(2022)
From Melancholia to Depression: Disordered Mood in Nineteenth-Century Psychiatry
(/isis/citation/CBB956265052/)
Article
Zorzanelli, Rafaela Teixeira;
(2010)
Psicastenia
(/isis/citation/CBB001420498/)
Article
Hane Htut Maung;
(2016)
To what do psychiatric diagnoses refer? A two-dimensional semantic analysis of diagnostic terms
(/isis/citation/CBB007035563/)
Article
Hein van den Berg;
(2023)
The essentialism of early modern psychiatric nosology
(/isis/citation/CBB175695180/)
Article
Andresen, Christopher Schroeder;
German E Berrios;
(2020)
‘My insanity in the year 1783’, by C.S. Andresen (1801)
(/isis/citation/CBB296326403/)
Article
Hissei Imai;
Yusuke Ogawa;
Kiyohito Okumiya;
Kozo Matsubayashi;
(2019)
Amok: a mirror of time and people. A historical review of literature
(/isis/citation/CBB352650465/)
Book
Pierre-Olivier Méthot;
(2020)
Vital Norms: Canguilhem's "The Normal and the Pathological" in the Twenty-First Century
(/isis/citation/CBB485036105/)
Article
Godderis, Rebecca;
(2013)
A Tricky Object to Classify: Evidence, Postpartum Depression and the DSM-IV
(/isis/citation/CBB001213776/)
Be the first to comment!