Article ID: CBB257883841

The Sociobiology of Genes: The Gene’s Eye View as a Unifying Behavioural-Ecological Framework for Biological Evolution (2017)

unapi

Although classical evolutionary theory, i.e., population genetics and the Modern Synthesis, was already implicitly ‘gene-centred’, the organism was, in practice, still generally regarded as the individual unit of which a population is composed. The gene-centred approach to evolution only reached a logical conclusion with the advent of the gene-selectionist or gene’s eye view in the 1960s and 1970s. Whereas classical evolutionary theory can only work with (genotypically represented) fitness differences between individual organisms, gene-selectionism is capable of working with fitness differences among genes within the same organism and genome. Here, we explore the explanatory potential of ‘intra-organismic’ and ‘intra-genomic’ gene-selectionism, i.e., of a behavioural-ecological ‘gene’s eye view’ on genetic, genomic and organismal evolution. First, we give a general outline of the framework and how it complements the—to some extent—still ‘organism-centred’ approach of classical evolutionary theory. Secondly, we give a more in-depth assessment of its explanatory potential for biological evolution, i.e., for Darwin’s ‘common descent with modification’ or, more specifically, for ‘historical continuity or homology with modular evolutionary change’ as it has been studied by evolutionary developmental biology (evo-devo) during the last few decades. In contrast with classical evolutionary theory, evo-devo focuses on ‘within-organism’ developmental processes. Given the capacity of gene-selectionism to adopt an intra-organismal gene’s eye view, we outline the relevance of the latter model for evo-devo. Overall, we aim for the conceptual integration between the gene’s eye view on the one hand, and more organism-centred evolutionary models (both classical evolutionary theory and evo-devo) on the other.

...More
Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB257883841/

Similar Citations

Essay Review Wolfe, Audra J.; (2001)
ELSI's Revenge (/isis/citation/CBB000100499/)

Book Philippe Huneman; Denis M. Walsh; (2017)
Challenging the Modern Synthesis: Adaptation, Development, and Inheritance (/isis/citation/CBB617122717/)

Book D. M. Walsh; (2015)
Organisms, Agency, and Evolution (/isis/citation/CBB057744056/)

Article Stotz, Karola; (2004)
Introduction (/isis/citation/CBB000600325/)

Book Tudge, Colin; (2001)
Impact of the Gene: From Mendel's Peas to Designer Babies (/isis/citation/CBB000102136/)

Article Gintis, Herbert; (2014)
Inclusive Fitness and the Sociobiology of the Genome (/isis/citation/CBB001421608/)

Chapter Gissis, Snait B.; Jablonka, Eva; (2011)
The Exclusion of Soft (“Lamarckian”) Inheritance from the Modern Synthesis (/isis/citation/CBB001500089/)

Book Jan Baedke; (2018)
Above the Gene, Beyond Biology: Toward a Philosophy of Epigenetics (/isis/citation/CBB511514088/)

Article Alan Grafen; (2019)
Should we ask for more than consistency of Darwinism with Mendelism? (/isis/citation/CBB453166142/)

Chapter Wilkins, Adam; (2011)
Why Did the Modern Synthesis Give Short Shrift to “Soft Inheritance”? (/isis/citation/CBB001500092/)

Book Milam, Erika Lorraine; (2010)
Looking for a Few Good Males: Female Choice in Evolutionary Biology (/isis/citation/CBB001020405/)

Chapter Ruse, Michael; (2005)
Evolutionary Biology and the Question of Trust (/isis/citation/CBB000651361/)

Article Gannett, Lisa; (2003)
The Normal Genome in Twentieth-Century Evolutionary Thought (/isis/citation/CBB000300619/)

Book Beurton, Peter; Falk, Raphael; Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg; (2000)
The Concept of the Gene in Development and Evolution (/isis/citation/CBB000100514/)

Essay Review Waldby, Catherine; (2001)
Code Unknown: Histories of the Gene (/isis/citation/CBB000100622/)

Article Ben Bradley; (2022)
Natural selection according to Darwin: Cause or effect? (/isis/citation/CBB830954057/)

Authors & Contributors
Jablonka, Eva
Emily Herrington
Wilkins, Adam
Walsh, Denis
Green, Lisa Anne
Wolfe, Audra Jayne
Concepts
Evolution
Genetics
Modern Synthesis (biology)
Genes
Biology
Philosophy of science
Time Periods
21st century
20th century
20th century, late
20th century, early
19th century
Places
United States
Institutions
Human Genome Project
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment