The Sociobiology of Genes: The Gene’s Eye View as a Unifying Behavioural-Ecological Framework for Biological Evolution (2017)
De Tiège, Alexis (Author)
Van de Peer, Yves (Author)
Braeckman, Johan (Author)
Tanghe, Koen B. (Author)
History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences
Volume: 40
Issue: 1
Pages: 6
Although classical evolutionary theory, i.e., population genetics and the Modern Synthesis, was already implicitly ‘gene-centred’, the organism was, in practice, still generally regarded as the individual unit of which a population is composed. The gene-centred approach to evolution only reached a logical conclusion with the advent of the gene-selectionist or gene’s eye view in the 1960s and 1970s. Whereas classical evolutionary theory can only work with (genotypically represented) fitness differences between individual organisms, gene-selectionism is capable of working with fitness differences among genes within the same organism and genome. Here, we explore the explanatory potential of ‘intra-organismic’ and ‘intra-genomic’ gene-selectionism, i.e., of a behavioural-ecological ‘gene’s eye view’ on genetic, genomic and organismal evolution. First, we give a general outline of the framework and how it complements the—to some extent—still ‘organism-centred’ approach of classical evolutionary theory. Secondly, we give a more in-depth assessment of its explanatory potential for biological evolution, i.e., for Darwin’s ‘common descent with modification’ or, more specifically, for ‘historical continuity or homology with modular evolutionary change’ as it has been studied by evolutionary developmental biology (evo-devo) during the last few decades. In contrast with classical evolutionary theory, evo-devo focuses on ‘within-organism’ developmental processes. Given the capacity of gene-selectionism to adopt an intra-organismal gene’s eye view, we outline the relevance of the latter model for evo-devo. Overall, we aim for the conceptual integration between the gene’s eye view on the one hand, and more organism-centred evolutionary models (both classical evolutionary theory and evo-devo) on the other.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Laurent Loison;
(2022)
The environment: An ambiguous concept in Waddington's biology
Article
Alison Bashford;
(2025)
The New Modern Synthesis: E. O. Wilson and Julian Huxley
Essay Review
Wolfe, Audra J.;
(2001)
ELSI's Revenge
Article
Stotz, Karola;
(2004)
Introduction
Book
Tudge, Colin;
(2001)
Impact of the Gene: From Mendel's Peas to Designer Babies
Book
Philippe Huneman;
Denis M. Walsh;
(2017)
Challenging the Modern Synthesis: Adaptation, Development, and Inheritance
Book
D. M. Walsh;
(2015)
Organisms, Agency, and Evolution
Article
Gintis, Herbert;
(2014)
Inclusive Fitness and the Sociobiology of the Genome
Chapter
Gissis, Snait B.;
Jablonka, Eva;
(2011)
The Exclusion of Soft (“Lamarckian”) Inheritance from the Modern Synthesis
Article
Jonathan B. L. Bard;
(2017)
C.H. Waddington’s Differences with the Creators of the Modern Evolutionary Synthesis: A Tale of Two Genes
Article
Erik L. Peterson;
(2017)
‘So Far Like the Present Period’: A Reply to ‘C.H. Waddington’s Differences with the Creators of the Modern Evolutionary Synthesis: A Tale of Two Genes’
Article
Alan Grafen;
(2019)
Should we ask for more than consistency of Darwinism with Mendelism?
Chapter
Wilkins, Adam;
(2011)
Why Did the Modern Synthesis Give Short Shrift to “Soft Inheritance”?
Thesis
Green, Lisa Anne;
(2012)
Science for Survival: The Modern Synthesis of Evolution and the Biological Sciences Curriculum Study
Chapter
Ruse, Michael;
(2005)
Evolutionary Biology and the Question of Trust
Book
Milam, Erika Lorraine;
(2010)
Looking for a Few Good Males: Female Choice in Evolutionary Biology
Essay Review
Waldby, Catherine;
(2001)
Code Unknown: Histories of the Gene
Article
Gannett, Lisa;
(2003)
The Normal Genome in Twentieth-Century Evolutionary Thought
Book
Marianne Sommer;
(2016)
History Within: The Science, Culture, and Politics of Bones, Organisms, and Molecules
Article
Goodenough, Ursula;
(2001)
Genomes, Gould, and Emergence
Be the first to comment!