Pence, David Evan (Author)
This essay examines Ewald von Kleist’s 1745 invention of the Leyden jar using previously overlooked letters and features of his experimental apparatus to address lingering mysteries concerning the discovery. It has traditionally been claimed that Kleist unknowingly violated standard practice by grounding the device, the assumption being that this was the only way to obtain his remarkable results. In recent years, however, this interpretation has faced serious challenges, with experimental replications showing substantial shocks without grounding and period sources providing reason to think that Kleist was insulated during the process. Supposing that Kleist was insulated raises puzzles of its own, however, as his results appear more extreme than such a charging method suggests. The missing piece, the author argues, is found in the unique nature of his setup. Drawing on established and novel sources, the essay shows how Kleist’s operation of his generator resulted in a closed circuit, explaining the strong charges cited by proponents of the traditional mistake narrative while upholding the absence of grounding.
...More
Article
Jerzy Sawicki;
(2018)
Kleist vs. Musschenbroek – a difficult way to truth
(/isis/citation/CBB490328457/)
Article
Cibelle Celestino Silva;
Peter Heering;
(2018)
Re-examining the Early History of the Leiden Jar: Stabilization and Variation in Transforming a Phenomenon into a Fact
(/isis/citation/CBB231128053/)
Article
Michael Bycroft;
(2019)
Hindsight, Tradition, and National Styles in the Prehistory of the Leyden Jar
(/isis/citation/CBB278674357/)
Article
Pieter Present;
(2022)
Petrus van Musschenbroek (1692–1761) and the early Leiden jar: A discussion of the neglected manuscripts
(/isis/citation/CBB861829669/)
Article
Saltzman, Martin D.;
(2001)
The Hare-Clarke Controversy over the Invention of the Improved Gas Blowpipe
(/isis/citation/CBB000740558/)
Chapter
Cavicchi, Elizabeth;
(2011)
The Spiral Conductor of Charles Grafton Page: Reconstructing Experience with the Body, More Options, and Ambiguity
(/isis/citation/CBB001250772/)
Article
Edward J. Gillin;
(2022)
The instruments of expeditionary science and the reworking of nineteenth-century magnetic experiment
(/isis/citation/CBB055349020/)
Article
Cavicchi, Elizabeth;
(2008)
Charles Grafton Page's Experiment with a Spiral Conductor
(/isis/citation/CBB000950525/)
Book
Staubermann, Klaus;
(2011)
Reconstructions: Recreating Science and Technology of the Past
(/isis/citation/CBB001250463/)
Article
Oestmann, Günther;
(2009/2010)
Zur Rekonstruktion und Publikation des Mondglobus von Tobias Mayer
(/isis/citation/CBB001024588/)
Book
Turkel, William J.;
(2013)
Spark from the Deep: How Shocking Experiments with Strongly Electric Fish Powered Scientific Discovery
(/isis/citation/CBB001213173/)
Chapter
Heering, Peter;
(2011)
Materialised Skills: Instrumental Development and Practical Experiences
(/isis/citation/CBB001250774/)
Chapter
Joan Steigerwald;
(2016)
The Subject as Instrument: Galvanic Experiments, Organic Apparatus and Problems of Calibration
(/isis/citation/CBB428488248/)
Book
Stén, Johan C. E.;
(2014)
A Comet of the Enlightenment: Anders Johan Lexell's Life and Discoveries
(/isis/citation/CBB001500577/)
Article
Mary Ellen Bowden;
Dee Ann Castel;
(2019)
Note: A modern scientific interpretation of Joseph Priestley's discovery of CO
(/isis/citation/CBB228856864/)
Book
Carlo Barletti;
Franco Giudice;
(2021)
Nuove sperienze elettriche secondo la teoria del Sig. Franklin e le produzioni del P. Beccaria
(/isis/citation/CBB017616646/)
Article
Baxfield, C. R. C.;
(2013)
“To Mend the Scheme of Providence”: Benjamin Franklin's Electrical Heterodoxy
(/isis/citation/CBB001252898/)
Chapter
Bresadola, Marco;
(2003)
At Play with Nature: Luigi Galvani's Experimental Approach to Muscular Physiology
(/isis/citation/CBB000330782/)
Article
Pier Remigio Salvi;
(2021)
Discovering Oxygen: Experimental Techniques and Logic of a Great Chemist, Carl Wilhelm Scheele
(/isis/citation/CBB414666961/)
Book
Weber, Heiko;
(2011)
Die Elektrisiermaschinen im 18. Jahrhundert
(/isis/citation/CBB001211077/)
Be the first to comment!