Was physics ever deterministic? The historical basis of determinism and the image of classical physics (2021)
Determinism is generally regarded as one of the main characteristics of classical physics, that is, the physics of the eighteenth and nineteenth century. However, an inquiry into eighteenth and nineteenth century physics shows that the aim of accounting for all phenomena on the basis of deterministic equations of motion remained far out of reach. Famous statements of universal determinism, such as those of Laplace and Du Bois-Reymond, were made within a specific context and research program and did not represent a majority view. I argue that in this period, determinism was often an expectation rather than an established result, and that especially toward the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, it was often thought of as a presupposition of physics: physicists such as Mach, Poincaré and Boltzmann regarded determinism as a feature of scientific research, rather than as a claim about the world. It is only retrospectively that an image was created according to which classical physics was uniformly deterministic.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Strien, Marij van;
(2014)
On the Origins and Foundations of Laplacian Determinism
(/isis/citation/CBB001320768/)
Article
Zemplén, Gábor Á.;
Demeter, Tamás;
(2010)
Being Charitable to Scientific Controversies: On the Demonstrativity of Newton's Experimentum Crucis
(/isis/citation/CBB001221445/)
Book
Lena Soler;
Trizio, Emiliano;
Andrew Pickering;
(2016)
Science as It Could Have Been: Discussing the Contingency/Inevitability Problem
(/isis/citation/CBB703800560/)
Chapter
JEAN-MICHEL SALANSKIS;
(2016)
Freedom of Framework
(/isis/citation/CBB009052880/)
Chapter
LÉNA SOLER;
(2016)
Why Contingentists Should Not Care about the Inevitabilist Demand to “Put-Up-or-Shut-Up”: A Dialogic Reconstruction of the Argumentative Network
(/isis/citation/CBB353874033/)
Chapter
ANDREW PICKERING;
(2016)
Science, Contingency, and Ontology
(/isis/citation/CBB369018906/)
Chapter
MIEKE BOON;
(2016)
Contingency and Inevitability in Science: Instruments, Interfaces, and the Independent World
(/isis/citation/CBB739751914/)
Chapter
RONALD N. GIERE;
(2016)
Contingency, Conditional Realism, and the Evolution of the Sciences
(/isis/citation/CBB173507393/)
Article
Anastasios Brenner;
(2021)
How Did Philosophy of Science Come About?: From Comte’s Positive Philosophy to Abel Rey’s Absolute Positivism
(/isis/citation/CBB732591048/)
Chapter
JEAN PAUL VAN BENDEGEM;
(2016)
Contingency in Mathematics: Two Case Studies
(/isis/citation/CBB062227235/)
Chapter
HARRY COLLINS;
(2016)
Contingency and “The Art of the Soluble”
(/isis/citation/CBB551368183/)
Chapter
Jean-Luc Gangloff;
Catherine Allamel-Raffin;
(2016)
Some Remarks about the Definitions of Contingentism and Inevitabilism
(/isis/citation/CBB897286199/)
Chapter
JOSEPH ROUSE;
(2016)
Laws, Scientific Practice, and the Contingency/Inevitability Question
(/isis/citation/CBB925368184/)
Chapter
HASOK CHANG;
(2016)
Cultivating Contingency: A Case for Scientific Pluralism
(/isis/citation/CBB947555912/)
Chapter
Claire Petitmengin;
MICHEL BITBOL;
(2016)
The Science of Mind as It Could Have Been: About the Contingency of the (Quasi-) Disappearance of Introspection in Psychology
(/isis/citation/CBB067600231/)
Chapter
IAN HACKING;
(2016)
On the Contingency of What Counts as “Mathematics”
(/isis/citation/CBB236243675/)
Chapter
JEAN-MARC LÉVY-LEBLOND;
(2016)
On the Plurality of (Theoretical) Worlds
(/isis/citation/CBB014827402/)
Chapter
YVES GINGRAS;
(2016)
Necessity and Contingency in the Discovery of Electron Diffraction
(/isis/citation/CBB613833523/)
Chapter
Emiliano Trizio;
(2016)
Scientific Realism and the Contingency of the History of Science
(/isis/citation/CBB273062090/)
Chapter
LÉNA SOLER;
(2016)
The Contingentist/Inevitabilist Debate: Current State of Play, Paradigmatic Forms of Problems and Arguments, Connections to More Familiar Philosophical Themes
(/isis/citation/CBB747335629/)
Be the first to comment!