The near consensus in the secondary literature on Feyerabend is that his epistemological anarchism, characterized by the slogan ‘anything goes’, was not a positive proposal but the conclusion of a reductio argument against his opponents (Lloyd 1997; Staley 1999; Munévar 2000; Farrell 2003; Tsou 2003; Oberheim 2006; Roe 2009). This makes anarchism a mere criticism rather than a substantive position in its own right. In this paper, I argue that Feyerabend held anarchism as a positive thesis. Specifically, I present two possible interpretations of anarchism: one where anarchism is entailed by Feyerabend's radical view of pluralism and another where scientists must be ‘methodological opportunists’, which Feyerabend held simultaneously from at least 1970. I then consider how these positions fare against the more influential criticisms of anarchism (Nagel 1977; Worrall 1978; Godfrey-Smith 2003). I conclude by suggesting two avenues to constraining a literal interpretation of ‘anything goes’ on Feyerabendian grounds.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Marij van Strien;
(2020)
Pluralism and anarchism in quantum physics: Paul Feyerabend's writings on quantum physics in relation to his general philosophy of science
(/isis/citation/CBB348944318/)
Book
Paul Feyerabend;
Ian Hacking;
(2010)
Against Method
(/isis/citation/CBB545479236/)
Article
Tsou, Jonathan Y.;
(2003)
Reconsidering Feyerabend's “Anarchism”
(/isis/citation/CBB000502674/)
Article
Jamie Shaw;
(2020)
The Problem of the Empirical Basis in the Popperian Tradition: Popper, Bartley, and Feyerabend
(/isis/citation/CBB854564067/)
Book
Feyerabend, Paul;
Oberheim, Eric;
(2011)
Tyranny of Science
(/isis/citation/CBB001024733/)
Article
Derek Lee;
(2017)
On Anarchy, or What We Talk About When We Talk About Science
(/isis/citation/CBB112494960/)
Article
Jamie Shaw;
(2021)
Feyerabend and manufactured disagreement: reflections on expertise, consensus, and science policy
(/isis/citation/CBB740430654/)
Article
Jamie Shaw;
(2021)
Feyerabend’s well-ordered science: how an anarchist distributes funds
(/isis/citation/CBB905453313/)
Article
Simon Lohse;
Karim Bschir;
(2020)
The Covid-19 Pandemic: A Case for Epistemic Pluralism in Public Health Policy
(/isis/citation/CBB948919196/)
Article
Lisa Heller;
(2016)
Between Relativism and Pluralism: Philosophical and Political Relativism in Feyerabend's Late Work
(/isis/citation/CBB660760906/)
Article
Martin Kusch;
(2016)
Relativism in Feyerabend's Later Writings
(/isis/citation/CBB418480926/)
Article
Gonzalo Munévar;
(2016)
Historical Antecedents to the Philosophy of Paul Feyerabend
(/isis/citation/CBB421620184/)
Book
Mitchell, Sandra;
(2009)
Unsimple Truths: Science, Complexity, and Policy
(/isis/citation/CBB001020062/)
Essay Review
Couvalis, George;
(2001)
Recent Feyerabendiana
(/isis/citation/CBB000100410/)
Article
Grégory Dufaud;
(2021)
Tournant autoritaire et ouverture des possibles: Trajectoires de médecins sous Staline
(/isis/citation/CBB979666483/)
Article
Jean-Pierre Llored;
(2021)
Chemistry and Measurement: Some Philosophical Lessons
(/isis/citation/CBB504612717/)
Article
Stefano Canali;
(2019)
Evaluating Evidential Pluralism in Epidemiology: Mechanistic Evidence in Exposome Research
(/isis/citation/CBB460640168/)
Book
Alex Broadbent;
(2019)
Philosophy of Medicine
(/isis/citation/CBB569956645/)
Article
Enrico Castelli Gattinara;
(2018)
The Relationship between History and Epistemology in Georges Canguilhem and Gaston Bachelard
(/isis/citation/CBB327073061/)
Article
Justin Donhauser;
Jamie Shaw;
(2019)
Knowledge transfer in theoretical ecology: Implications for incommensurability, voluntarism, and pluralism
(/isis/citation/CBB535618423/)
Be the first to comment!