Anissa Tanweer (Author)
James Steinhoff (Author)
Social Studies of Science
Volume: 54
Issue: 1
Pages: 133-160
As a nascent field within the academy, the contours, attributes, and bounties of data science are still indeterminate and contested. We studied how participants in an initiative to establish data science at a large American research university defined data science and articulated their relationships to the field. We discuss two contrasting visions for data science among our research participants. One vision is a transdisciplinary view portraying data science as a phenomenon with transcendent, appropriative, and impositional qualities that sits apart from academic domains. Another view of data science—one that was far more prevalent among our research subjects—casts data science as grounded, relational, and adaptive, emerging from crosspollination of numerous academic domains. We argue that this latter formulation represents a more quotidian reality of data science and positions the field as an extradiscipline, defined as a field that exists to facilitate the exchange of knowledge, skills, tools, and methods from an indeterminate and fluctuating set of disciplinary perspectives while conserving the boundaries of those disciplines. We argue that the dueling transdisciplinary and extradisciplinary visions for data science have important implications for how the field will mature, and that the extradiscipline concept opens novel directions for studying academic knowledge production in STS, contributing additional precision to the literature on disciplinarity and its permutations.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
David Ribes;
(2019)
STS, Meet Data Science, Once Again
(/isis/citation/CBB739449022/)
Article
Alina Geampana;
Manuela Perrotta;
(2023)
Predicting Success in the Embryology Lab: The Use of Algorithmic Technologies in Knowledge Production
(/isis/citation/CBB717872146/)
Article
David Demortain;
(2024)
Mistrust of the black box: The public auditing of private models in the chemicals regulatory space
(/isis/citation/CBB384424304/)
Article
Elina Helosvuori;
Riikka Homanen;
(June 2022)
When craft kicks back: Embryo culture as knowledge production in the context of the transnational fertility industry
(/isis/citation/CBB035082879/)
Article
Amanda Menking;
Jon Rosenberg;
(May 2021)
WP:NOT, WP:NPOV, and Other Stories Wikipedia Tells Us: A Feminist Critique of Wikipedia’s Epistemology
(/isis/citation/CBB986509779/)
Article
María Fernanda Olarte-Sierra;
(2019)
Of flesh and bone: Emotional and affective ethnography of forensic anthropology practices amidst an armed conflict
(/isis/citation/CBB046116318/)
Article
Claudia Salomon Tarquini;
(2019)
Academic knowledge about indigenous peoples in the Americas: A comparative approach about the conditions of its international circulation
(/isis/citation/CBB286322356/)
Article
Clémence Pinel;
(March 2021)
Renting Valuable Assets: Knowledge and Value Production in Academic Science
(/isis/citation/CBB574556496/)
Article
Giulia Giannini;
(2022)
Towards a Computational History of Science: Limitations and Perspectives of an Emerging Research Approach
(/isis/citation/CBB550458097/)
Article
Marco Tamborini;
(2020)
Technoscientific approaches to deep time
(/isis/citation/CBB800223742/)
Article
Katharina T. Paul;
Samantha Vanderslott;
Matthias Gross;
(2022)
Institutionalised ignorance in policy and regulation
(/isis/citation/CBB024957428/)
Article
Henri Boullier;
Emmanuel Henry;
(2022)
Toxic Ignorance: How Regulatory Procedures and Industrial Knowledge Jeopardise the Risk Assessment of Chemicals
(/isis/citation/CBB183545703/)
Book
Sarah Ehlers;
Stefan Esselborn;
(2022)
Evidence in Action between Science and Society: Constructing, Validating, and Contesting Knowledge
(/isis/citation/CBB104485678/)
Article
Paola Govoni;
(2022)
Feminist networks beyond the science wars: the ‘female brain’ in the 1790s and the 1990s
(/isis/citation/CBB875771419/)
Article
Joseph Coppola;
(2023)
The Commodification of Dr. King, or What Intellectual Property Rights Did to Civil Rights
(/isis/citation/CBB398343249/)
Article
David Demortain;
(2024)
How scientists become experts—or don’t: Social organization of research and engagement in scientific advice in a toxicology laboratory
(/isis/citation/CBB039693533/)
Article
Sarah Blacker;
Aya H Kimura;
Abby Kinchy;
(October 2021)
When citizen science is public relations
(/isis/citation/CBB240395704/)
Article
Schwerin, Alexander von;
(December 2022)
Gegenwissen. Die Neuen Sozialen Bewegungen in der Bundesrepublik und die Grundlagen ihrer Wirkung [Counterknowledge. The New Social Movements in the Federal Republic and the Foundations of Their Impact]
(/isis/citation/CBB958806855/)
Article
Donald L. Opitz;
(2024)
Editorial: Re-enchanting the vocation of science
(/isis/citation/CBB895149347/)
Book
James Leach;
Lee Wilson;
(2014)
Subversion, Conversion, Development: Cross-Cultural Knowledge Exchange and the Politics of Design
(/isis/citation/CBB594959277/)
Be the first to comment!