This study takes off from the ethical problem that racism grounded in population genetics raises. It is an analysis of four standard scientific responses to the problem of genetically motivated racism, seen in connection with the Human Genome Diversity Project (HGDP): (1) Discriminatory uses of scientific facts and arguments are in principle ‘misuses’ of scientific data that the researcher cannot be further responsible for. (2) In a strict scientific sense, genomic facts ‘disclaim racism’, which means that an epistemically correct grasp of genomics should be ethically justified. (3) Ethical difficulties are issues to be ‘resolved’ by an ethics institution or committee, which will guarantee the ethical quality of the research scrutinized. (4) Although population genetics occasionally may lead to racism, its overall ‘value’ for humankind justifies its cause as a desirable pursuit. I argue that these typical responses to genetically motivated racism supervene on a principle called the ‘ethic of knowledge’, which implies that an epistemically correct account has intrinsic ethical value. This principle, and its logically related ideas concerning the ethic of science, effectively avoids a deeper ethical question of responsibility in science from being raised.
...More
Article
Turner, Trudy R.;
(2013)
Ethical Issues in Human Population Biology
(/isis/citation/CBB001212639/)
Article
Ruha Benjamin;
(November 2016)
Informed Refusal: Toward a Justice-based Bioethics
(/isis/citation/CBB856025239/)
Article
Fernando Vidal;
(2019)
What Makes Neuroethics Possible?
(/isis/citation/CBB007853781/)
Book
Charis Thompson;
(2013)
Good Science: The Ethical Choreography of Stem Cell Research
(/isis/citation/CBB157943209/)
Article
Yoshio Nukaga;
(July 2016)
Ethics Expertise and Public Credibility: A Case Study of the Ethical Principle of Justice
(/isis/citation/CBB610704199/)
Book
Benjamin Hurlbut;
(2017)
Experiments in Democracy: Human Embryo Research and the Politics of Bioethics
(/isis/citation/CBB656933386/)
Book
Enrico Furlan;
(2020)
Il principialismo di Beauchamp e Childress: una ricostruzione storico-filosofica
(/isis/citation/CBB988833100/)
Book
Bernardino Fantini;
Fabrizio Rufo;
(2017)
Il codice della vita. Una storia della genetica tra scienza e bioetica
(/isis/citation/CBB297801530/)
Book
Giovanni Fornero;
Maurizio Mori;
(2012)
Laici e cattolici in bioetica: storia e teoria di un confronto
(/isis/citation/CBB846992376/)
Article
Silvia Siano;
(2020)
Albert R. Jonsen: one of the most important pioneers of Bioethics and Clinical Ethics. An historical portrait
(/isis/citation/CBB595476468/)
Article
Daniel J. Hicks;
(2017)
Genetically Modified Crops, Inclusion, and Democracy
(/isis/citation/CBB212227086/)
Book
Mark Coeckelbergh;
(2013)
Human Being @ Risk: Enhancement, Technology, and the Evaluation of Vulnerability Transformations
(/isis/citation/CBB944837263/)
Article
Deborah Scott;
(2023)
Diversifying the Deliberative Turn: Toward an Agonistic RRI
(/isis/citation/CBB650192444/)
Article
Marjoleine G. van der Meij;
Jacqueline E. W. Broerse;
Frank Kupper;
(December 2017)
Supporting Citizens in Reflection on Synthetic Biology by Means of Video-Narratives
(/isis/citation/CBB984497768/)
Chapter
Fujigaki, Yuko;
(2019)
Lessons from Fukushima for Responsible Innovation: How to Construct a New Relationship Between Science and Society?
(/isis/citation/CBB226528985/)
Chapter
Brice Laurent;
(2019)
Innovation for Whom? City Experiments and the Redefinition of Urban Democracy
(/isis/citation/CBB945612494/)
Chapter
Ruphy, Stéphanie;
(2019)
Public Participation in the Setting of Research and Innovation Agenda: Virtues and Challenges from a Philosophical Perspective
(/isis/citation/CBB395602715/)
Article
Nina Frahm;
Tess Doezema;
Sebastian Pfotenhauer;
(January 2022)
Fixing Technology with Society: The Coproduction of Democratic Deficits and Responsible Innovation at the OECD and the European Commission
(/isis/citation/CBB550648723/)
Article
Clarence C. Gravlee;
(2009)
How Race Becomes Biology: Embodiment of Social Inequality
(/isis/citation/CBB440520535/)
Article
Shelley Ochs;
(2015)
Medicine and Morality in the Ho Family in Lijiang
(/isis/citation/CBB600427403/)
Be the first to comment!