IsisCB Explore

Article ID: CBB229057405

The Global Comrades of Mr. Democracy and Mr. Science: Placing May Fourth in a Transnational History of Science Activism (2022)

East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal
Volume: 16
Issue: 3
Pages: 305-326

DOI: 10.1080/18752160.2020.1868698

URI: https://doi.org/10.1080/18752160.2020.1868698

Publication Date: 2022
Edition Details: Special Issue: Challenging and Reinvigorating China’s “Mr. Science”: Global History, Science and Democracy, Universality without Eurocentrism, and Beyond
Language: English

Outside Links

WorldCat

Google Scholar

JSTOR

Academia.edu

Democracy Marxism History of science, as a discipline Political activists and activism Liberalism May Fourth Movement Transnational history Marxism

The May Fourth movement is widely recognized as a watershed within Chinese cultural and political history, but it was also a significant local episode within a global history of science activism. Quaintly idiosyncratic as Chen Duxiu’s “two gentlemen,” Mr. Democracy and Mr. Science, may appear, they have also animated (in only somewhat less personified form) a transnational “conversation” very much alive today. Focusing on neglected Marxist participants, this paper reconstructs meaningful snatches of that long conversation in China, Russia, Britain, the US, and Japan. It finds that Chinese voices contributed in timely and important ways, especially on the problem of imperialism for science and democracy. It further shows that Marxists, in China and beyond, have shared certain modernist values with their liberal counterparts, including a faith in the democratic potential of universally valid scientific knowledge; however, they have offered highly divergent perspectives on what constitutes democracy and how it relates to science, challenging liberal efforts to separate science from politics and highlighting the contradictions generated by capitalism. A fuller understanding of the significance of Marxist and Chinese contributions to the cumulative discourse on science and democracy, and a livelier engagement with their voices, will help generate more liberatory socio-technical imaginaries.

...More

Associated with

Article Victor Seow; Sean Hsiang-lin Lei (2022) Who Is Mr. Science and Why Does He Matter?. East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal (pp. 269-278). unapi

Citation URI

https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB229057405/

Citations Indexes

Similar Citations

Article Lepistö, Antti; (2015)
Revisiting the Left-Wing Response to Sociobiology: The Case of Finland in a European Context (/isis/citation/CBB001422101/)

Article Enebakk, Vidar; (2009)
Lilley Revisited: Or Science and Society in the Twentieth Century (/isis/citation/CBB000952783/)

Article Roberts, Edwin A.; (2005)
From the History of Science to the Science of History: Scientists and Historians in the Shaping of British Marxist Theory (/isis/citation/CBB000740709/)

Book Hessen, Boris; (2006)
Les racines sociales et économiques des Principia de Newton: une rencontre entre Newton et Marx à Londres en 1931 (/isis/citation/CBB000950649/)

Article Jacobsen, Anja Skaar; (2008)
The Complementarity between the Collective and the Individual: Rosenfeld and Cold War History of Science (/isis/citation/CBB000932232/)

Article Gerardo Ienna; Giulia Rispoli; (2021)
The 1931 London Congress: The Rise of British Marxism and the Interdependencies of Society, Nature and Technology (/isis/citation/CBB402338643/)

Article James A. Secord; (2021)
Revolutions in the Head: Darwin, Malthus and Robert M. Young (/isis/citation/CBB614318115/)

Article Pietro D. Omodeo; (2016)
After Nikolai Bukharin: History of Science and Cultural Hegemony at the Threshold of the Cold War Era (/isis/citation/CBB761792722/)

Essay Review Roll-hansen, Nils; (2012)
Marxist Roots of Science Studies (/isis/citation/CBB001500169/)

Article Chilvers, C. A. J.; (2003)
The Dilemmas of Seditious Men: The Crowther-Hessen Correspondence in the 1930s (/isis/citation/CBB000671082/)

Article Sheehan, Helena; (2007)
The Influence of Marxism on Science Studies: 1931 and Now (/isis/citation/CBB000931867/)

Article Victor Seow; Sean Hsiang-lin Lei; (2022)
Who Is Mr. Science and Why Does He Matter? (/isis/citation/CBB356374547/)

Article Zuoyue Wang; (2022)
Practicing Mr. Science: Chinese Scientists and the May Fourth Movement from Zhu Kezhen to Fang Lizhi (/isis/citation/CBB822830037/)

Article Fa-ti Fan; (2022)
“Mr. Science”, May Fourth, and the Global History of Science (/isis/citation/CBB027652084/)

Article Anders Sevelsted; (2019)
Degeneration, Protestantism, and Social Democracy: The Case of Alcoholism and “Illiberal” Policies and Practices in Denmark 1900–43 (/isis/citation/CBB831518679/)

Book Donna J. Haraway; Cary Wolfe; (2016)
Manifestly Haraway (/isis/citation/CBB769213536/)

Book Herbert S. Lewis; (2013)
In Defense of Anthropology: An Investigation of the Critique of Anthropology (/isis/citation/CBB278862964/)

Article Fabio Lusito; (2023)
The scientia case: scientific censorship and ideological struggles, 1973-1975 (/isis/citation/CBB961108556/)

Article Brook W.R. Pearson; (2015)
The Soviet Nomad: Tarkovsky’s Science Fiction War Machine (/isis/citation/CBB505692562/)

Article Jim Berryman; (2022)
Frederick Antal and the Marxist challenge to art history (/isis/citation/CBB866460053/)

Comments

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}